Document Detail


Effect of recommendations from reviewers suggested or excluded by authors.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21852583     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) gives authors submitting original research the option of suggesting qualified reviewers or those they wish to exclude. This historical habit often leaves us wondering whether author preferences correlate with reviewer recommendations and whether differences related to reviewer selection affect decisions by editors. In a self-study presented here, we found that author-suggested reviewers, as a group, make more positive recommendations than editor-suggested reviewers (P = 0.01), although the difference disappears when recommendations are compared with those of editor-suggested reviewers of the same manuscript (P = 0.081). The distribution of recommendations by author-excluded reviewers, as a group, did not differ from those by editor-suggested reviewers; however, author-excluded reviewers impart significantly more negative recommendations than other reviewers of the same manuscript (P = 0.029). We further explored whether such differences result from individual reviewer tendencies to give generally more positive or more negative recommendations than editor-suggested reviewers and found no such tendency. Finally, editorial decisions on manuscripts reviewed by author-suggested or author-excluded reviewers do not differ from those decisions on manuscripts assigned but not reviewed by them. JASN's policy of editors making decisions independent from individual reviewer recommendations minimizes the effect of selection bias on publication decisions.
Authors:
Jessica L Moore; Eric G Neilson; Vivian Siegel;
Related Documents :
21823033 - Cardiac-related varicella mortality in childhood: a literature review with clinical exp...
21909153 - Porocephalosis due to encysted armillifer nymph presenting as an acute abdominal emerge...
1792203 - Nevus comedonicus: case report and brief review of the literature.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2011-08-18
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN     Volume:  22     ISSN:  1533-3450     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.     Publication Date:  2011 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-09-01     Completed Date:  2011-10-31     Revised Date:  2013-05-23    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9013836     Medline TA:  J Am Soc Nephrol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1598-602     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, D3100 Medical Center North, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. jessica.l.moore@gmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Editorial Policies*
Nephrology / organization & administration
Peer Review*
Periodicals as Topic
Retrospective Studies
Selection Bias
Comments/Corrections
Erratum In:
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Oct;22(10):1953

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Diagnostic value of urinary sodium, chloride, urea, and flow.
Next Document:  Cross talk between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and vitamin D-FGF-23-klotho in chronic k...