Document Detail


Effect of escalating versus fixed voltage treatment on stone comminution and renal injury during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20018316     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: ESWL is a minimally invasive, efficacious therapy for most renal stones. However, an optimal voltage treatment protocol ensuring effective stone comminution while minimizing tissue injury is not well established. We performed a prospective, randomized trial of the stone-free rate and renoprotective effect of an escalating vs a fixed voltage treatment strategy during ESWL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and June 2008 we enrolled 45 patients undergoing ESWL for a renal stone in this institutional review board approved trial. A Dornier DoLi 50 lithotriptor was used. Patients were randomized to receive the escalating strategy of 500 shocks at 14k V, 1,000 at 16 kV and 1,000 at 18 kV or the fixed strategy of 2,500 shocks at 18 kV. Abdominal x-ray was done to determine the stone-free rate at 1 month. Voided urine was analyzed for beta2-microglobulin and microalbumin before, immediately after and 1 week after ESWL to evaluate renal damage. RESULTS: Median patient age was 48 years. Median stone size was 8 mm. Of patients in the escalating group 81% were stone-free vs 48% in the fixed group (p <0.03). There was a significant difference between microalbumin and beta2-microglobulin 1 week after the procedure (p = 0.046 vs 0.045). There was trend toward a difference in microalbumin and beta2-microglobulin immediately after the procedure (p = 0.17 and 0.25, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, randomized study shows that an escalating voltage treatment strategy produces better stone comminution than a fixed strategy. The study suggests that there may be a protective effect against damage caused by ESWL with an escalating treatment strategy.
Authors:
Erica H Lambert; Rhonda Walsh; Melissa W Moreno; Mantu Gupta
Related Documents :
16758046 - Efficacy of terazosin as a facilitator agent for expulsion of the lower ureteral stones.
17884516 - Comparative analysis of 2 techniques of double-gloving protection during arch bar place...
21873356 - A randomized trial of aprotinin-free fibrin sealant versus absorbable hemostat.
8798966 - Urinary calculous disease in south-eastern nigeria.
15084376 - Temporal trends in percutaneous mitral commissurotomy over a 15-year period.
22560486 - Outcomes 2 to 5 years following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in the...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial     Date:  2009-12-16
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of urology     Volume:  183     ISSN:  1527-3792     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Urol.     Publication Date:  2010 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-01-28     Completed Date:  2010-02-23     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376374     Medline TA:  J Urol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  580-4     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2010 American Urological Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Urology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Female
Humans
Kidney / injuries*
Kidney Calculi / therapy*
Lithotripsy / adverse effects*,  methods*
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Single-Blind Method

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Dipstick Pseudohematuria: Unnecessary Consultation and Evaluation.
Next Document:  Incidence, Clinical Symptoms and Management of Rectourethral Fistulas After Radical Prostatectomy.