Document Detail


Effect of epidural neuraxial blockade-dependent sedation on the Ramsay Sedation Scale and the composite auditory evoked potentials index in surgical intensive care patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20708510     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Peripheral deafferentation induced by neuraxial anesthesia reduces the degree of cortical arousal. This study investigated whether epidural analgesia blockade decreased sedation, as measured by the rapidly extracted auditory evoked potentials index, A-line autoregressive index (AAI) and Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) in sedated surgical intensive care patients, and looked at whether this was a concentration-dependent effect of lidocaine. METHODS: Forty patients underwent major lower abdominal surgery and received epidural analgesia in the surgical intensive care unit. Patients were continuously sedated with propofol to achieve an RSS value of 3, randomly divided into two groups, and received epidural analgesia with 10 mL of 0.5% or 1% lidocaine. Sedation was evaluated using the RSS and AAI, and analgesia was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). RSS, AAI, electromyography (EMG) activity of AAI and VAS values were recorded at 5 minutes before and 30, 60 and 90 minutes after epidural lidocaine administration. RESULTS: Epidural 0.5% lidocaine produced a reduction of AAI, EMG and VAS at 30, 60 and 90 minutes after administration. For 1% epidural lidocaine administration, AAI, EMG and VAS were also reduced at 30, 60 and 90 minutes after epidural lidocaine administration. However, there was no difference in the AAI between the two concentrations; moreover, no significant change was observed in the RSS. CONCLUSION: Epidural lidocaine analgesia could potentiate sedation in patients evaluated by the AAI, but had no effect on the RSS. The present study suggests that the AAI could provide an objective and more precise index than the RSS in evaluation of sedation level in patients who are undergoing epidural pain management in the intensive care unit.
Authors:
Chueng-He Lu; Jia-Lin Chen; Ching-Tang Wu; Wen-Jinn Liaw; Chun-Chang Yeh; Chen-Hwan Cherng; Chih-Shung Wong
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi     Volume:  109     ISSN:  0929-6646     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Formos. Med. Assoc.     Publication Date:  2010 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-08-16     Completed Date:  2010-09-15     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9214933     Medline TA:  J Formos Med Assoc     Country:  China (Republic : 1949- )    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  589-95     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
2010 Formosan Medical Association & Elsevier. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Abdomen / surgery
Aged
Analgesia, Epidural*
Conscious Sedation / classification
Electroencephalography / drug effects*
Electromyography
Evoked Potentials, Auditory / drug effects*
Female
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives / administration & dosage*,  pharmacology
Intensive Care
Intensive Care Units
Lidocaine / administration & dosage*,  pharmacology
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative / drug therapy*
Postoperative Care
Propofol / administration & dosage*,  pharmacology
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Hypnotics and Sedatives; 137-58-6/Lidocaine; 2078-54-8/Propofol

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Impact of Therapeutic Interventions on Survival of Patients With Hepatic Hydrothorax.
Next Document:  Duration for Apical Barrier Formation in Necrotic Immature Permanent Incisors Treated With Calcium H...