Document Detail


Effect of aging conditions on the repair bond strength of a microhybrid and a nanohybrid resin composite.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20157647     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: this study evaluated the effect of different aging methods on the repair bond strength and failure types of a microhybrid and a nanohybrid composite.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: disk-shaped microhybrid (Quadrant Anterior Shine-QA) and nanohybrid (Tetric EvoCeram-TE) resin composite specimens (N = 192, n = 12/per group) were photopolymerized and randomly assigned to one of the three aging conditions: (1) immersion in deionized water (37°C, 2 months), (2) thermocycling (5000 times, 5 to 55 °C), (3) immersion in citric acid (pH: 3.0; 1 week). The control group was stored dry for 24 h at 37°C. After aging procedures, the specimens were silica coated (30 microm SiO2) (CoJet-Sand) using an intraoral air abrasion device, silanized (ESPESil) and an intermediate adhesive resin was applied (Visio-Bond, 3M ESPE). Resin composites, once of the same kind as the substrate (QA-QA, TE-TE) and once other than the substrate material (QA-TE, TE-QA) were adhered onto the conditioned substrates. Shear force was applied to the adhesive interface in a universal testing machine (cross-head speed: 1 mm/min).
RESULTS: a significant influence of the aging method was observed (p < 0.05) but the composite type did not affect the repair bond strength (p = 0.755) (2-way ANOVA, Tukey's test). Interaction terms were significant (p < 0.05). Thermocycling showed lower results (10 ± 2.6 to 14.4 ± 4.4 MPa) than those of other aging methods (12.7 ± 5.2 to 28 ± 5.3 MPa). Using the substrate and the adherend interchangeably (QA-TE, TE-QA) did not show significant differences in the control group, but the results were significant after aging (p = 0.007) (2-way ANOVA, Tukey's test). Interaction terms were not significant (p = 0.124). The incidence of score A (cohesive failures in the substrate) was not significant between the composite combinations in the control groups (exclusively 100%) and water-storage aged groups (92% to 100%) (p > 0.05) (chi-square). Citric acid aging yielded significantly less incidence of score A (8-75%) compared to the control group in all composite combinations (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: both microhybrid and nanohybrid composites could be used either as a substrate or as relayering composites in early repairs. Aging factors may diminish the repair quality.
Authors:
Mutlu Ozcan; Cenk Cura; Johannes Brendeke
Related Documents :
19701847 - Do footedness and strength asymmetry relate to the dominant stance in swimming track st...
14717537 - Anthropometric and physiological traits: age changes among the oraon agricultural labou...
20129117 - Shoulder functional ratio in elite junior tennis players.
18492527 - Aerobic capacity in children with hemophilia.
22492317 - Preeminence of staphylococcus aureus in infective endocarditis: a 1-year population-bas...
19597687 - Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix in a 14-year-old adolescent: case report ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The journal of adhesive dentistry     Volume:  12     ISSN:  1461-5185     ISO Abbreviation:  J Adhes Dent     Publication Date:  2010 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-01-19     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100888552     Medline TA:  J Adhes Dent     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  451-9     Citation Subset:  D    
Affiliation:
University of Zürich, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Dental Material Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland. mutluozcan@hotmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Cardiac tamponade and successful pericardiocentesis in an extremely low birth weight neonate with pe...
Next Document:  Measuring bond strength between fiber post and root dentin: a comparison of different tests.