Document Detail


Editorial independence and the editor-owner relationship: good editors never die, they just cross the line.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20087545     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The concept of editorial freedom or independence is examined in the light of the editor-owner relationship. Like individual and national freedom or independence, it is a rhetorical concept whose realisation flows from internal achievement as much as it depends on external validation. This freedom entails roles and responsibilities embodied in specific codes of practice for editors, such as the guidelines espoused by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Association of Medical Editors. The calling to embody these guidelines makes editing a vocation that demands isolation and distancing, separation and solitude. It involves bracketing one's biases, prejudgments and preconceptions. With such detachment comes real freedom; one that requires a moral fibre and trustworthiness that uphold truth and right, whether in full view of public scrutiny, or in the aloneness of private secrecy. The stereotypical tension between academic and commercial concerns highlights the editor-owner relationship, and bears directly on editorial independence. In practice, journal owners overstep their prerogatives. The absence of clear contracts defining editorial independence and the lack of established mechanisms governing the editor-owner relationship affect many small- to medium-sized journals in developing countries. Even large journals in developed and democratic nations or totalitarian states and societies are not spared. At the end of the day, editorial freedom exists only insofar as it is tolerated, or until editors cross the line.
Authors:
J F Lape?a
Related Documents :
12971915 - Content analysis of television advertising for cars and minivans: 1983-1998.
12878465 - Molecular estimation of eulipotyphlan divergence times and the evolution of "insectivora".
8984075 - Smoking in irish journals: a content analysis 1960-1994.
11402795 - Reviewing the reviewers: the quality of reporting in three secondary journals.
22117025 - Analysis of australian newspaper coverage of medication errors.
367205 - Physicians' attitudinal changes in alcoholism.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Editorial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Singapore medical journal     Volume:  50     ISSN:  0037-5675     ISO Abbreviation:  Singapore Med J     Publication Date:  2009 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-01-20     Completed Date:  2010-05-19     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0404516     Medline TA:  Singapore Med J     Country:  Singapore    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1120-2     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Editorial Policies*
Humans
Societies, Medical

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Lung hypoplasia and patellar agenesis in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
Next Document:  Pathological examination of the placenta: raison d'??tre, clinical relevance and medicolegal utility...