Document Detail


Economic evaluation of the treatment of grade II haemorrhoids: a comparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy and rubber band ligation.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19508532     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: Haemorrhoidal disease is a common condition causing considerable distress to individuals and significant cost to healthcare services. This paper explored the cost-effectiveness of stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) compared with the non-surgical intervention, rubber band ligation (RBL), for grade II symptomatic circumferential haemorrhoids. METHOD: An economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial conducted between October 2002 and February 2005. Adults were recruited and randomized to either SH or RBL. The same surgeon performed all procedures and investigators were blinded until analyses were completed. Primary outcomes measured at 52 weeks were cumulative costs to the NHS, clinical diagnosis of recurrence and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS: Sixty symptomatic men and women with confirmed clinical diagnosis of grade II symptomatic haemorrhoids were randomized. Loss to follow-up was up to 10% at 52 weeks. The mean cost for SH was greater than RBL (mean difference: 1483 pounds, 95% CI: 1339-1676); disease recurrence was lower (OR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-0.86); and there was no evidence of a statistically significant difference in QALYs (-0.014, 95% CI: -0.076 to 0.051). SH was associated with a modest incremental cost per recurrence avoided at 12 months follow-up (4945 pounds). Based on current data, it was considered highly unlikely to be cost-effective in terms of incremental cost per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence about the cost-effectiveness of SH for grade II haemorrhoids to recommend its routine use in place of RBL. Further information is needed from larger trials with a longer-term follow-up to inform subsequent economic evaluation.
Authors:
L McKenzie; R de Verteuil; J Cook; V Shanmugam; M Loudon; A J M Watson; L Vale
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland     Volume:  12     ISSN:  1463-1318     ISO Abbreviation:  Colorectal Dis     Publication Date:  2010 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-06-22     Completed Date:  2010-10-27     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100883611     Medline TA:  Colorectal Dis     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  587-93     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Data Bank Information
Bank Name/Acc. No.:
ISRCTN/ISRCTN23585705
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Hemorrhoids / economics,  surgery*
Humans
Ligation / economics*
Male
Recurrence
Surgical Stapling / economics*
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
//Chief Scientist Office

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Benchmarking circumferential resection margin (R1) resection rate for rectal cancer in the neoadjuva...
Next Document:  Seasonal variation in short-term mortality after surgery for colorectal cancer?