Document Detail


Economic costs of cataract surgery using a rigid and a foldable intraocular lens.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11430619     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Optimal delivery of healthcare requires consideration of various costs. A foldable intraocular lens (IOL) is more expensive than an equivalent rigid IOL. However, surgical and post-operative costs may make a foldable IOL economically preferable. We compared the economic costs of cataract surgery plus implantation of a foldable IOL with implantation of a rigid IOL. Prospective audit of the clinical records of 82 pseudophakes; 39 implanted with a rigid IOL and 43 implanted with a foldable IOL by one surgeon. Average follow-up periods were 25 +/- 7 months and 23 +/- 5 months respectively. There was no difference between the two groups for the follow-up period (P = 0.55), number of post-operative complications (P = 0.25) or cost of post-operative visits (P = 0.83). The cost of single-use theatre equipment was greater for the rigid-IOL group (P= 0.0001). The total identified cost per patient was greater for the foldable-IOL group (P = 0.0001). Despite possible technical advantages, implantation of the foldable IOL did not provide an economic benefit, either in the initial cost or in the costs of post-operative care. Over the 2-year period, implanting with the rigid IOL cost, on average, Pound Sterling57 less per patient. Despite this economic difference, a cost-benefit analysis is required, since other factors may be more important.
Authors:
A J Afsar; R L Woods; S Pate; F Rogan; W Wykes
Related Documents :
19044239 - The visian myopic implantable collamer lens does not significantly affect axial length ...
8997579 - Sulcus fixated posterior chamber lenses with and without suture in cases lacking capsul...
14691179 - Feasibility of drug delivery to the posterior pole of the rabbit eye with an episcleral...
3625519 - Intraocular lens implantation in an underdeveloped country.
17881989 - Corneal astigmatism with upper eyelid gold weight implantation using the combined high ...
3960469 - Differences between men and women as related to intraocular lens implantation.
16139699 - Hybrid layer thickness and resin tag length of a self-etching adhesive bonded to sound ...
8667269 - Effect of two dentinal desensitizing agents on retention of complete cast coping using ...
12956479 - Posterior implants for distal extension removable prostheses: a retrospective study.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)     Volume:  21     ISSN:  0275-5408     ISO Abbreviation:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt     Publication Date:  2001 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2001-06-29     Completed Date:  2001-07-19     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8208839     Medline TA:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  262-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures / economics
Cataract Extraction / economics*,  methods
Follow-Up Studies
Hospital Costs*
Humans
Lens Implantation, Intraocular / economics
Lenses, Intraocular / economics*
Medical Audit
Phacoemulsification / economics*
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies
Scotland

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The effect of under and over refractive correction on visual performance and spectacle lens acceptan...
Next Document:  Detection of uveal melanoma by optometrists in the United Kingdom.