Document Detail

Early echocardiographic predictors of increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure three months after myocardial infarction in rats.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22739724     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the early echocardiographic predictors of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) after a long follow-up period in the infarcted rat model.
MATERIAL/METHODS: Five days and three months after surgery, sham and infarcted animals were subjected to transthoracic echocardiography. Regression analysis and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve were performed for predicting increased LVEDP 3 months after MI.
RESULTS: Among all of the variables, assessed 5 days after myocardial infarction, infarct size (OR: 0.760; CI 95% 0.563-0.900; p=0.005), end-systolic area (ESA) (OR: 0.761; CI 95% 0.564-0.900; p=0.008), fractional area change (FAC) (OR: 0.771; CI 95% 0.574-0.907; p=0.003), and posterior wall-shortening velocity (PWSV) (OR: 0.703; CI 95% 0.502-0.860; p=0.048) were predictors of increased LVEDP. The LVEDP was 3.6±1.8 mmHg in the control group and 9.4±7.8 mmHg among the infarcted animals (p=0.007). Considering the critical value of predictor variables in inducing cardiac dysfunction, the cut-off value was 35% for infarct size, 0.33 cm2 for ESA, 40% for FAC, and 26 mm/s for PWSV.
CONCLUSIONS: Infarct size, FAC, ESA, and PWSV, assessed five days after myocardial infarction, can be used to estimate an increased LVEDP three months following the coronary occlusion.
Authors:
Paula S Azevedo; Bertha F Polegato; Marcos F Minicucci; Stephan M Pio; Igor A Silva; Priscila P Santos; Katashi Okoshi; Sergio A R Paiva; Leonardo A M Zornoff
Related Documents :
21770864 - Mesenchymal stem cell delivery into rat infarcted myocardium using a porous polysacchar...
123464 - Occurrence of coronary ostial stenosis in a necropsy series of myocardial infarction, s...
14596664 - Are implantable cardioverter-defribrillators always superior to amiodarone?
9185934 - Evaluation of agonal artifacts in the myocardium using a combination of histological st...
24610514 - Biventricular takotsubo cardiomyopathy in graves hyperthyroidism.
9799954 - Alcohol and congestive heart failure.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research     Volume:  18     ISSN:  1643-3750     ISO Abbreviation:  Med. Sci. Monit.     Publication Date:  2012 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-06-28     Completed Date:  2012-10-24     Revised Date:  2013-07-12    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9609063     Medline TA:  Med Sci Monit     Country:  Poland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  BR253-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Botucatu Medical School, UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Animals
Diastole / physiology*
Myocardial Infarction / pathology,  physiopathology*,  ultrasonography*
ROC Curve
Rats
Time Factors
Ventricular Pressure / physiology*
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Med Sci Monit
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Med. Sci. Monit
Journal ID (publisher-id): Medical Science Monitor
ISSN: 1234-1010
ISSN: 1643-3750
Publisher: International Scientific Literature, Inc.
Article Information
Download PDF
© Med Sci Monit, 2012
License:
Received Day: 05 Month: 3 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 22 Month: 3 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 01 Month: 7 Year: 2012
Volume: 18 Issue: 7
First Page: BR253 Last Page: BR258
PubMed Id: 22739724
ID: 3560778
Publisher Id: 883202

Early echocardiographic predictors of increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure three months after myocardial infarction in rats
Paula S. AzevedoABCDEF
Bertha F. PolegatoBCDE
Marcos F. MinicucciABCDEF
Stephan M. PioBCDE
Igor A. SilvaBCDE
Priscila P. SantosBCDE
Katashi OkoshiBCDE
Sergio A. R. PaivaABCDEF
Leonardo A. M. ZornoffABCDEF
Department of Internal Medicine, Botucatu Medical School, UNESP, Botucatu, Brazil
Correspondence: Leonardo A. M. Zornoff, Department of Internal Medicine, Botucatu Medical School, UNESP, Botucatu, SP, CEP: 18618-970, Brazil, e-mail: lzornoff@fmb.unesp.br
AStudy Design
BData Collection
CStatistical Analysis
DData Interpretation
EManuscript Preparation
FLiterature Search
GFunds Collection

Background

Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the most important cardiovascular diseases throughout the world. Ventricular dysfunction and heart failure are frequent complications of MI and are associated with poor outcome. Importantly, knowledge of the related mechanisms and clinical features are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure after MI [13].

One of the strategies used most often to study the treatment and pathophysiologic alterations related to ventricular dysfunction is the experimental model in rats [49]. Among other factors, this is due to similarities to the pathophysiologic alterations that occur in humans.

In rat models, however, one main limitation is the difficulty of noninvasively establishing the ventricular dysfunction diagnosis. Consequently, most studies have used left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) as the main criterion for ventricular dysfunction in rats [1013]. However, this invasive approach requires cannulation of one of the carotid arteries, which makes longitudinal studies difficult to perform. It is therefore necessary to establish non-invasive criteria for diagnosing heart failure in rats.

Recently, the echocardiogram has been used to estimate LVEDP in this model [1013]. However, the role of echocardiographic variables soon after MI as predictors of ventricular dysfunction in the chronic period after coronary occlusion remains to be elucidated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine early echocardiographic predictors of increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure three months after MI in rats.


Material and methods
Experimental protocol

All experiments and procedures were performed in concordance with the National Institute of Health’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of our Institution.

Myocardial infarction was induced according to a previously described method [14,15]. Briefly, rats were anesthetized with ketamine (70 mg/kg) and xylazine (1 mg/kg) and submitted to left lateral thoracotomy. After heart exteriorization, the left atrium was retracted to facilitate ligation of the left coronary artery with 5-0 mononylon suture between the pulmonary outflow tract and the left atrium. The heart was then replaced into the thorax, the lungs were inflated with positive pressure, and the thoracotomy was closed. Sham-operated animals were used as controls. Five days after surgery, the animals were subjected to transthoracic echocardiography. Likewise, three months after surgery, sham and infarcted animals were subjected to transthoracic echocardiography.

Echocardiographic study

The exams were performed using a commercially available echocardiographic machine (Philips model HDI 5000) equipped with a 12 MHz phased array transducer. Imaging was performed with a 60° sector angle and a 3-cm imaging depth. Rats were anaesthetized by intramuscular injection with a mixture of ketamine (50 mg/kg) and xylazine (1 mg/kg). After the chest was shaved, rats were placed in the left lateral position. Two-dimensional targeted M-mode echocardiograms were obtained from short-axis views of the left ventricle (LV) at or just below the tip of the mitral-valve leaflets, and at the level of the aortic valve and left atrium. M-mode images of LV, left atrium, and aorta were recorded. All measurements were obtained by the same observer, according to the latest method recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Echocardiography [12]. Measurements represented the mean of at least five consecutive cardiac cycles. LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and posterior wall thickness (PWT) were measured at maximal diastolic dimension, and the end-systolic dimension (LVSD) was taken at maximal anterior motion of the posterior wall. The left atrium was measured at its maximal diameter, and the aorta was measured at the end of diastole. After that, LV end-systolic and end-diastolic endocardial borders were traced in short-axis view to obtain the end-systolic (ESA) and end-diastolic (EDA) cavity areas. Fractional area change (FAC), systolic posterior wall-shortening velocity (PWSV), Tei index (Tei), cardiac index (CI), ejection fraction (EF), and fractional shortening (FS) were used as indices of left ventricular systolic function. The velocities of transmitral diastolic flow (E and A velocities) were obtained from the apical four-chamber view. The E/A ratio, the isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), the isovolumetric relaxation time normalized by heart rate (IVRT/RR0,5), and the E wave deceleration time (EDT) were used as indices of LV diastolic function [1018].

The lengths with akinesis or dyskinesis and viable muscle for both the endocardial and epicardial circumferences were determined in short-axis view. The infarct size was calculated by dividing the endocardial and epicardial circumferences of the infarcted area by the total epicardial and endocardial ventricular circumferences.

Assessment of ventricular dysfunction

The measurement of LVEDP was performed in rats under anesthesia with ketamine (50 mg/Kg) and xylazine (1 mg/Kg) intraperitoneally. The neck was opened and the musculature was dissected until visualization of the right carotid artery. The carotid artery was dissected and isolated and the portion near to the head was attached. A small incision was made in the artery, where it was cannulated with polyvinyl chloride catheter (diameter 0.5 mm), filled with heparin solution (500 IU/mL), and connected to a Gould model Windowgraf polygraph. The catheter was introduced progressively until it achieved the left ventricle, with visualization of the characteristic pressure curve. Measurements were performed through the average of ten consecutive measurements of end diastolic pressure, obtained through graphic polygraph records. After the pressure measurement, the catheter was removed and the portion near the heart artery was also occluded.

Ventricular dysfunction was defined as infarcted values of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure with difference >2 standard deviations above the sham group mean.

Statistical analysis

Comparisons between groups were performed using Student’s t test for parameters with normal distributions. Otherwise, comparisons between groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Data were expressed as mean ±SD or medians (including the lower and upper quartiles). χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables. Regression analysis was performed to assess the predictor variables of increased LVEDP. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed for increased LVEDP prediction. Data analysis was carried out with SigmaStat for Windows v2.03 and Medcal v11.5.1 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The significance level was considered as 5%.


Results

Five days after myocardial infarction, several potential echocardiographic predictors of heart failure were evaluated in the infarcted rats (n=41), including: infarct size, LVEDD, LVSD, ESA, EDA, FAC, PWSV, EF, FS E, A, E/A, IVRT, IVRT/RR0,5, and EDT (Table 1).

The echocardiographic morphological data obtained after three months’ follow-up are presented in Table 2. The infarct size in the infarcted animals ranged from 13.5% to 57.5%, with an average of 41±10%. In our laboratory, the infarct size assessed by histology and by echocardiogram presented a bias between the methods at −1.15% [18]. As expected, the infarcted group presented left ventricular dilation and atrium enlargement in comparison with sham animals.

The functional data, after three months’ follow-up, are presented in Table 3. The morphological alterations induced by coronary occlusion were associated with worsened systolic function, combined with severe diastolic dysfunction, compatible with a restrictive pattern.

Considering the predictors of cardiac dysfunction, among all variables assessed, infarct size (AUC: 0.760; CI 95% 0.563–0.900; p=0.005), ESA (AUC: 0.761; CI 95% 0.564–0.900; p=0.008), FAC (AUC: 0.771; CI 95% 0.574–0.907; p=0.003) and PWSV (AUC: 0.703; CI 95% 0.502–0.860; p=0.048) were predictors of increased LVEDP.

The LVEDP was 3.6±1.8 mmHg in the control group and 9.4±7.8 mmHg in the infarcted animals (p=0.007).

Considering the value of predictor variables necessary to induce cardiac dysfunction, the cut-off value was 35% for infarct size (83% sensitivity, 77% specificity; Figure 1), 0.33 cm2 for ESA (91% sensitivity, 77% specificity; Figure 2), 40% for FAC (92% sensitivity, 70% specificity; Figure 3), and 26 mm/s for PWSV (75% sensitivity, 77% specificity; Figure 4).


Discussion

The objective of this study was to determine the early echocardiographic predictors of cardiac dysfunction after a long follow-up period in the infarcted rat model. Our data indicate that infarct size, FAC, ESA, and PWSV, assessed five days after the myocardial infarction, can be used to predict an increase in LVEDP three months following the coronary occlusion.

In rat models, there is no consensual definition of cardiac dysfunction. Likewise, LVEDP is often used to assess cardiac dysfunction and heart failure. However, the gold standard for assessing LVEDP is invasive hemodynamics, which cannot be measured in longitudinal studies. Therefore, a noninvasive method to predict LVEDP is a critical issue in the elaboration of a model of cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction.

Previous works have studied the relationship between echocardiographic parameters and LVEDP in the infarct rat model. The Tei index presents a good correlation with invasive parameters of cardiac dysfunction [10]. Likewise, the 13-segment left ventricular wall motion score index and the Tei index correlated with LVEDP 8 weeks after myocardial infarction [13]. Five weeks after coronary occlusion, posterior wall-shortening velocity was a valid criterion for heart failure [9]. Using tissue Doppler echocardiogram, the E/E’ ratio presented a strong correlation with LVEDP three months after myocardial infarction [8]. Therefore, echocardiographic variables can be used to estimate LVEDP. However, these studies assessed echocardiographic variables late after myocardial infarction. In addition, the cut-off values to discriminate animals with heart failure soon after the coronary occlusion remain to be determined.

Our study analyzed echocardiographic variables five days after the myocardial infarction. In this manner, we avoided the influence of trauma, bleeding, and pneumothorax on our variables. Among all echocardiographic variables studied, our data identified four predictors of increased LVEDP after three months’ follow-up: infarct size, FAC, ESA, and PWSV.

Considering the relationship between infarct size and cardiac dysfunction, it is accepted that the consequences of coronary occlusion are closely related to infarction size. In fact, the infarct size was a powerful determinant of survival [19], ventricular remodeling [20,21], and cardiac systolic function [22] in this model. Therefore, the fact that infarct size was a predictor of cardiac dysfunction is not a surprise. An important point is that infarct size can be evaluated by echocardiogram, since, despite the low level of concordance, there was a strong correlation between echocardiographic and histological analyses [23]. Therefore, our study suggests that infarct size larger than 35%, as assessed by echocardiogram, is necessary to induce heart failure after three months’ follow-up.

Another early predictor of cardiac dysfunction was ventricular remodeling. Regardless of the complexity of the remodeling process, the term is frequently used as a synonym for ventricular dilation after myocardial infarction [24,25]. Consequently, our data, in concordance with the concept that remodeling is a powerful determinant of cardiac function following multiple injuries [2426], indicated that systolic area larger than 0.33 cm2 predicted increased LVEDP three months after myocardial infarction.

Considering the cardiac function, our data have shown that the infarcted rats presented diastolic dysfunction, with both pseudo-normal and restrictive Doppler patterns. However, no diastolic functional variable, assessed soon after the myocardial infarction, predicted elevated LVEDP. As expected, the infarcted animals also presented systolic dysfunction. Among all variables analyzed, FAC and PWSV predict elevated LVEDP. In addition, we found that values of FAC and PWSV smaller than 40% and 26 mm/s, respectively, are necessary to induce heart failure after three months’ follow-up. Therefore, in studies of heart failure, animals with values above these cut-off values should be excluded.

Our results have important implications. Myocardial infarction is the most common cause of cardiac dysfunction [27]. In addition, the model of experimental myocardial infarction in rats has been studied extensively, due to the similarities to alterations in humans [46]. Therefore, knowledge about noninvasive variable cut-off values soon after myocardial infarction and use of this knowledge to predict cardiac dysfunction might be extremely useful in the randomization and follow-up periods, considering that longitudinal studies are essential to investigate the pathophysiology of cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction.


Conclusions

In conclusion, infarct size larger than 35%, fractional area change smaller than 40%, end-systolic area larger than 0.33 cm2, and posterior wall-shortening velocity less than 26 mm/s, assessed 5 days after the myocardial infarction, can be used to estimate the increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure three months after the coronary occlusion.


Notes

fn8-medscimonit-18-7-br253Source of support: This work was supported by the Botucatu Medical School

References
1. Cleland JGF,Torabi A,Khan NK. Epidemiology and management of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the aftermath of a myocardial infarctionHeartYear: 200591ii7ii1315831613
2. Minicucci MF,Azevedo PS,Polegato BF,et al. Heart failure after myocardial infarction: clinical implications and treatmentClin CardiolYear: 2011344101421688276
3. Gheorghiade M,Fonarow GC. Management of post-myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunctionAm J MedYear: 20071201092017275447
4. Zornoff LAM,Paiva SAR,Minicucci MF,et al. Experimental myocardium infarction in rats: analysis of the modelArq Bras CardiolYear: 2009934344019936465
5. Litwin SE. The rat model of postinfarction heart failureHeart FailYear: 19951118295
6. Francis J,Weiss RM,Wei SG,et al. Progression of heart failure after myocardial infarction in ratsAm J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp PhysiolYear: 2001281R173445
7. Duarte DR,Minicucci MF,Azevedo PS,et al. Influence of lisinopril on cardiac remodeling induced by tobacco smoke exposureMed Sci MonitYear: 2010168BR2555920671606
8. Oliveira SA Junior,Dal Pai-Silva M,Martinez PF,et al. Diet-induced obesity causes metabolic, endocrine and cardiac alterations in spontaneously hypertensive ratsMed Sci MonitYear: 20101612BR3677321119569
9. Oliveira SA Junior,Dal Pai-Silva M,Martinez PF,et al. Differential nutritional, endocrine, and cardiovascular effects in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats fed standard and hypercaloric dietsMed Sci MonitYear: 2010167BR2081720581769
10. Jegger D,Jeanrenaud X,Nasratullah M,et al. Noninvasive Doppler-derived myocardial performance index in rats with myocardial infarction: validation and correlation by conductance catheterAm J Physiol Heart Cell PhysiolYear: 2006290H154048
11. Prunier F,Gaertner R,Louedec L,et al. Doppler echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure after MI in ratsAm J Physiol Heart Cell PhysiolYear: 2002283H34652
12. Sjaastad I,Sejersted OM,Ilebekk A,et al. Echocardiographic criteria for detection of postinfarction congestive heart failure in ratsJ Appl PhysiolYear: 20008914455411007581
13. Morgan EE,Faulx MD,McElfresh TA,et al. Validation of echocardiographic methods for assessing left ventricular dysfunction in rats with myocardial infarctionAm J Physiol Heart Circ PhysiolYear: 2004287H20495315475530
14. Zornoff LAM,Matsubara BB,Matsubara LS,et al. Early rather than delayed administration of lisinopril protects the heart after myocardial infarction in ratsBasic Res CardiolYear: 2000952081410879622
15. Minicucci MF,Azevedo PS,Ardisson LP,et al. Relevance of the ventricular remodeling pattern in the model of myocardial infarction in ratsArq Bras CardiolYear: 2010956353820857043
16. Lang RM,Bierig M,Devereaux RB,et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of CardiologyJ Am Soc EchocardiogrYear: 20051814406316376782
17. Minicucci MF,Azevedo PS,Oliveira SA Jr,et al. Tissue vitamin A insufficiency results in adverse ventricular remodeling after experimental myocardial infarctionCell Physiol BiochemYear: 2010265233021063090
18. Minicucci MF,Azevedo PS,Martinez PF,et al. Critical infarct size to induce ventricular remodeling, cardiac dysfunction and heart failure in ratsInt J CardiolYear: 20111512424321719125
19. Pfeffer MA,Pfeffer JM,Steimberg BS,et al. Survival after an experimental myocardial infarction: beneficial effects of long-term therapy with captoprilCirculationYear: 1985412406123891136
20. Fletcher PJ,Pfeffer JA,Pfeffer MA,et al. Left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relations in rats with healed myocardial infarction: effects on systolic functionCirc ResYear: 198149618267261261
21. Pfeffer JA,Pfeffer MA,Fletcher PJ,et al. Progressive ventricular remodeling in rat with myocardial infarctionAm J Physiol Heart Circ PhysiolYear: 1991260H140614
22. Pfeffer MA,Pfeffer JM,Fishbein MC,et al. Myocardial infarct size and ventricular function in ratsCirc ResYear: 19794450312428047
23. Minicucci MF,Azevedo PS,Duarte DR,et al. Comparison of different methods to measure experimental chronic infarction size in the rat modelArq Bras CardiolYear: 2007899398
24. Pfeffer MA,Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: experimental observations and clinical implicationsCirculationYear: 1990811161722138525
25. Zornoff LAM,Paiva SAR,Duarte DR,et al. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: concepts and clinical implicationsArq Bras CardiolYear: 2009921576419360250
26. Cohn JN,Ferrari R,Sharpe N. Cardiac remodeling – concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodelingJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 2000355698210716457
27. McMurray JJV. Systolic Heart FailureN Engl J MedYear: 20103622283820089973

Article Categories:
  • Basic Research

Keywords: heart failure, cardiac function, remodeling.

Previous Document:  Expression of auxin-binding protein1 during plum fruit ontogeny supports the potential role of auxin...
Next Document:  Injury-to-surgery interval does not affect the occurrence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a pr...