Document Detail


Duplicate presentations on prostate cancer at American Urological Association and European Association of Urology annual meetings.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19535105     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: We determined the rate of duplicate research presentations at recent American Urological Association and European Urological Association annual meetings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We cross-referenced all clinical research presentations related to prostate cancer presented at the 2006 American Urological Association and European Urological Association annual meetings with those presented at the corresponding annual meetings in 2005, 2006 and 2007 using a defined search strategy based on author names, abstract titles, study design and objectives. All data abstraction was performed in duplicate by 2 independent reviewers to ensure accuracy. RESULTS: We identified 282 and 312 abstracts on prostate cancer clinical research at the 2006 European Urological Association and American Urological Association annual meetings, respectively. The overall duplication rate of American Urological Association abstracts was 19.2% (60 of 312). Of duplicated abstracts 80.0% (48 of 60) were presented at the European Urological Association annual meeting the same year. Duplication of European Urological Association abstracts was identified in 20.9% (59 of 282). Authors who presented the same research (71 duplicate abstracts) at the 2 meetings altered the presentations in various ways, including a different study title in 40.8%, a different first and senior author in 14.1% and 18.3%, and increased or decreased sample size in 8.5% and 14.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately a fifth of clinical research abstracts on prostate cancer presented at the American Urological Association annual meeting were also presented at the European Urological Association meeting and vice versa. Inconsistencies between duplicate abstracts raise concerns about the integrity of the underlying studies. Stricter submission guidelines and improved dissemination of research findings from the 2 meetings may help limit this practice.
Authors:
George H Pop; Susan F Fesperman; David A Ball; Lawrence L Yeung; Johannes Vieweg; Philipp Dahm
Related Documents :
21104155 - Assessing graduate student progress in engineering ethics.
20390365 - Meeting report and abstracts from the american association of tissue banks annual meeti...
11613375 - Mainstreaming chiropractic: tracing the american chiropractic association.
21262075 - Improving ethics analysis in health technology assessment.
1751075 - Asaio presidential address.
13981115 - The susceptibility of culex pipiens fatigans wiedemann larvae to insecticides in malaya.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2009-06-17
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of urology     Volume:  182     ISSN:  1527-3792     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Urol.     Publication Date:  2009 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-07-14     Completed Date:  2009-08-06     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376374     Medline TA:  J Urol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  674-8; discussion 678-9     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Abstracting and Indexing as Topic / statistics & numerical data*
Congresses as Topic*
Europe
Humans
Male
Prostatic Neoplasms*
Societies, Medical*
United States
Urology*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Third-generation tension-free tape for female stress urinary incontinence.
Next Document:  Predictors of cost and clinical outcomes of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.