Document Detail

Dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging for differentiating the lymph nodes between malignant lymphoma and benign lesions.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23188388     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the clinical value of dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging to differentiate malignant lymphoma (ML) from benign lymph node (BLN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects were 310 lymph nodes in 84 patients (195 ML lesions in 30 patients and 115 BLN in 54 patients associated with various etiologies.). F-18 FDG PET/CT scan was performed at 50 min (early scan) and at 100 min (delayed scan) after the injection. First, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of each lesion at early and delayed scans was calculated. Second, we estimated the difference between early and delayed SUVmax (D-SUVmax) and the retention index (RI-SUVmax) to evaluate the change of tracers in the lesions. Furthermore, proper cut-off values of them were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The efficacy of each parameter was analyzed with ANOVA. RESULTS: Delayed SUVmax and D-SUVmax in ML were significantly higher than those in BLN. Proper cut-off value in delayed SUVmax was 4.0 and in D-SUVmax was 1.0. When the proper cut-off value in D-SUVmax was applied, the D-SUVmax yielded the role of diagnosis with sensitivity of 82.6 %, specificity of 65.2 %, positive predictive value of 80.1 % and negative predictive value of 68.8 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The delayed SUVmax and D-SUVmax were useful indices to differentiate ML from BLN, regardless of histologic subtype. Dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging may help to consider whether there is any need to proceed to more invasive tests, such as biopsy, in individual patients.
Michihiro Nakayama; Atsutaka Okizaki; Shunta Ishitoya; Miki Sakaguchi; Junichi Sato; Tamio Aburano
Related Documents :
25139548 - Is postoperative computed tomography evaluation a prognostic indicator in patients with...
23886598 - Diagnostic performance of 64-mdct for blunt small bowel perforation.
1997708 - Nonspecific magnetic resonance appearance of renal oncocytomas: report of 3 cases and r...
2925928 - Aggressive fibromatosis of the tongue: mr demonstration.
18542258 - Thin-film sensing with planar terahertz metamaterials: sensitivity and limitations.
21483078 - Thermal relaxation of magnetic clusters in amorphous hf(57)fe(43) alloy.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-11-28
Journal Detail:
Title:  Annals of nuclear medicine     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1864-6433     ISO Abbreviation:  Ann Nucl Med     Publication Date:  2012 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-11-28     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8913398     Medline TA:  Ann Nucl Med     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Department of Radiology, Asahikawa Medical University, 2-1-1-1 Midorigaoka-higashi, Asahikawa, 078-8510, Japan,
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Ann Nucl Med
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Ann Nucl Med
ISSN: 0914-7187
ISSN: 1864-6433
Publisher: Springer Japan, Japan
Article Information
Download PDF
© The Author(s) 2012
Received Day: 16 Month: 7 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 14 Month: 11 Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 28 Month: 11 Year: 2012
pmc-release publication date: Day: 28 Month: 11 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Month: 2 Year: 2013
Volume: 27 Issue: 2
First Page: 163 Last Page: 169
PubMed Id: 23188388
ID: 3575551
Publisher Id: 669
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-012-0669-1

Dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging for differentiating the lymph nodes between malignant lymphoma and benign lesions
Michihiro NakayamaAff1 Address: +81-166-682572 +81-166-682579
Atsutaka OkizakiAff1
Shunta IshitoyaAff1
Miki SakaguchiAff2
Junichi SatoAff2
Tamio AburanoAff1
Department of Radiology, Asahikawa Medical University, 2-1-1-1 Midorigaoka-higashi, Asahikawa, 078-8510 Japan
Division of Radiology, Asahikawa Medical University Hospital, Asahikawa, Japan


Malignant lymphoma (ML) is one of the most common hematologic malignancy [1]. According to the National Cancer Institute in the US, there were 75,190 new cases of the malignant lymphomas in the US in 2011, and 20,620 deaths from the diseases. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is widely used for staging and treatment evaluation of ML [2, 3]. PET/CT offers advantages over conventional imaging techniques, because it can demonstrate abnormal metabolic activity and extension of malignant diseases [46]. However, many inflammatory lesions such as pneumonia, sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, etc., also have elevated F-18 FDG uptake in PET, leading to false-positive results [710]. Moreover, there is considerable overlap between the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) of ML and BLN, causing difficulty in correctly diagnosing F-18 FDG PET data [1113]. Some reports indicated that F-18 FDG PET was sensitive and specific in the diagnosis and staging for patients with ML on single-time-point scans [14, 15]. In patients with head and neck malignant tumors [16], pulmonary nodules [17, 18], breast cancer [19], pancreas tumors [20], and bone malignant tumor [21], several authors have reported significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET scan with dual-time-point scans.

F-18 FDG uptakes in many malignant lesions are increased with time interval [22, 23]. In patients with ML, recently, Shinya et al. [2] statistically evaluated the differences of FDG uptake in early and delayed scans, and compared the maximum SUV (SUVmax) and the retention index (RI) of SUVmax (RI-SUVmax) between the different grades of lymphoma. Because various cell types exhibit varying rates of F-18 FDG uptake [16, 17, 19, 23, 24], we hypothesized that measurements of SUVmax at two time points may prove to be of value in differentiating ML from BLN.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT scan in initial diagnosis of ML, with analyses of the SUVmax on 50-min early and 100-min delayed scans.

Materials and methods
Patient population

The subjects consisted of 30 patients (15 men and 15 women; mean age, 64.6 ± 12.2 years) with 195 lymph nodes of ML and 54 patients (26 men and 28 women; mean age, 61.7 ± 17.7 years) with 115 benign lymph nodes associated with various etiologies. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. All patients underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT scanning for the differential diagnosis from July 2009 to May 2011. They were finally diagnosed according to clinical and radiologic follow-up (follow-up period of time; at least 6 months) and/or histopathological findings. The histopathology examinations confirmed 30 patients with ML and 29 patients with BLN. 25 patients with BLN were finally diagnosed according to clinical and radiologic follow-up (8.74 ± 3.30 months, range 6–18 months). Reactive lymph nodes are defined as lymph nodes, which diagnosed no malignancy through a clinical follow-up with no treatment or proof of no increase in size and accumulations on F-18 FDG PET/CT scans, in the patients with suspected malignancy. None of the patients had received chemotherapy or radiation therapy before the dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET scans. Informed consent was obtained from all patients participating in the study. This study was retrospective and ethics committee approval was deemed unnecessary in our institution.

F-18 FDG PET/CT scans

All imaging and data acquisition was performed on a combined PET/CT in-line system (Discovery VCT, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). This device integrates a PET scanner with a 64 multi-detector row CT and permits the acquisition of coregistered CT and PET images in the same session. At the time of F-18 FDG injection, all patients had fasted for at least 4 h and had blood sugar levels of less than 120 mg/dl. The scan was performed twice: an early whole-body (from head to pelvis) scan at 50 min after the injection of 3.7 MBq/kg of F-18 FDG, followed by a delayed scan at 100 min. The scans consisted of 7 or 8 beds, and the length of one bed was 16 cm. A delayed scan was performed for the same field of view and scan area in early scan. The image acquisition time per bed was 2–3 min. The PET images were reconstructed iteratively with three dimensional ordered-subset expectation maximization (VUE point, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). An unenhanced CT scan (100 mA with auto mA, 0.6 s/rotation, 120 kV) from the head to the pelvic floor was acquired (reconstructed slice thickness 3.27 mm) for fusing with PET images. PET/CT fusion images on three orthogonal (transaxial, coronal and sagittal) planes were reviewed on a workstation (Advantage Workstation version 4.4, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA).

Image analysis

F-18 FDG accumulations were considered positive when focal uptake was more intense than the mediastinal blood-pool activity in the early scan or delayed scan. PET images were interpreted independently and prospectively by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, without the knowledge of histopathologic or other radiologic data. In case of a discrepant reading, the two physicians discussed the case together to reach consensus about referral. The results of FDG uptake were classified by a four-score visual scale using the individuals’ blood-pool radioactivity as a reference. The classification was defined as follows: 0 radioactivity lower than that of blood-pool; 1 radioactivity equal to that of blood-pool; 2 radioactivity mild higher than that of blood-pool; and 3 radioactivity obviously higher than that of blood-pool. The short-axis diameter of lymph nodes was measured on CT scan. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of lymph node-related F-18 FDG accumulation on 50 min (early SUVmax) and 100 min (delayed SUVmax) images after F-18 FDG injection was calculated as follows:

[Formula ID: Equa]
[\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {\text{SUV}} = \{ {\text{Tissue activity }}({\text{Bq}}/{\text{g}})\} /\{ {\text{Injected F}} - 18{\text{ FDG dose}} ({\text{Bq}})/{\text{body weight (g)}}\} $$\end{document}]

A region of interest (ROI) which was manually drawn for SUVmax calculation on early PET scans was placed over the area of maximal metabolic activity on the transaxial slice showing tumor-related increased uptake. On delayed PET scans, ROIs were placed in identical positions. In addition to RI-SUVmax, we tried to evaluate an usefulness of difference between early SUVmax and delayed SUVmax (D-SUVmax) in this study, as a more simple index. The RI-SUVmax and the D-SUVmax were calculated as follows:

[Formula ID: Equb]
[\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \begin{aligned} {\text{RI-SUVmax }} & = {\text{ (Delayed SUVmax}} - {\text{Early SUVmax)}}/{\text{Early SUVmax}} \\ {\text{D-SUVmax }} & = {\text{ Delayed SUVmax}} - {\text{Early SUVmax}} \\ \end{aligned} $$\end{document}]

We estimated these quantitative values to evaluate the change of tracers in the lesions at 50 and 100 min after the F-18 FDG injection.

All lymph nodes showed increased accumulations of F-18 FDG on early and delayed scans. D-SUVmax and RI-SUVmax were calculated with uptake of same lymph nodes on the both scans.

Statistical analysis

Differences in visual scores analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, using the STATISTICA 03J (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the proper cut-off value for the difference ML and BLN. The overall statistically difference of area under the curves (AUCs) was evaluated with ANOVA, and we compared differences between AUCs of those indices using DBM-MRMC, version 2.2, software ( A paired 2-tailed t test was used to compare differences between ML and BLN in those indices. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

ROC analysis

The detailed data are described in Table 2. ROC analysis revealed that the use of delayed SUVmax and D-SUVmax provided better differentiation between ML and BLN than the use of early SUVmax and RI-SUVmax alone (Fig. 1). The AUCs in delayed SUVmax and D-SUVmax were statistically greater than in early SUVmax (P < 0.005). There was no significant difference between the AUCs in delayed SUVmax and D-SUVmax. The largest AUC has obtained with D-SUVmax in the four indices. The proper cut-off value of D-SUVmax for the differential diagnosis was >1.0; 161 of 195 ML and 75 of 115 BLN were correctly diagnosed using the cut-off value, yielding a sensitivity of 82.6 %, specificity of 65.2 %, positive predictive value (PPV) of 80.1 %, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 68.8 % (Table 2). The accuracy of D-SUVmax was 76.1 %, and the highest value compared with other indices or its combination.

SUVmax and RI-SUVmax

The mean values of early SUV max, delayed SUVmax, D-SUVmax, and RI-SUVmax were 6.70 ± 5.43, 8.62 ± 6.27, 1.91 ± 1.33 and 0.38 ± 0.23 in ML, and 3.37 ± 2.43, 4.16 ± 2.44, 0.80 ± 1.04 and 0.25 ± 0.25 in BLN, respectively. There were significant differences between ML and BLN in those indices (P < 0.01 for all comparisons; Figs. 2, 3). ML and BLN tended to demonstrate increase uptake in visual scores on delayed scans, but there was no significant difference between ML and BLN (Table 3).


The present study evaluated the usefulness of SUVmax and RI-SUVmax on dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT scans, performed at 50 and 100 min after tracer injection, in patients with ML and BLN. The AUCs of delayed SUVmax and D-SUVmax were statistically greater than that of early SUVmax. D-SUVmax had the largest AUC among the four indices, which led to improved sensitivity and specificity.

The F-18 FDG uptake by lymphoma is probably associated with Glut1 expression [25, 26] and Ki-67 values [27, 28]. In many malignant tumors, scan start times of 45–60 min have been reported to cause significant underestimation of the true SUVs, because SUVs do not reach maximum levels until several hours after F-18 FDG injection [2, 23, 29]. Kumar et al. reported that F-18 FDG uptake in malignant cells was related to low glucose-6-phosphatase activity, and increased glucose uptake through glucose transporter proteins in these cells. In contrast, such a prolonged period of F-18 FDG uptake is rare in benign lesions or normal tissues [22, 23]. Gupta et al. [30] reported that the influx rate constant was greater in malignant lesions than in benign lesions, and that continuous tracer uptake by malignant lesions was observed in pulmonary tumor.

According to our results, delayed SUVmax and D-SUVmax were significantly better predictors of ML than early SUVmax. The AUC of D-SUVmax was the greatest among these four indices. Dual-time-point scans may have an advantage to observe the serial change of uptake in the lesions. Contrary to expectations, the present study showed that there was no significant difference in AUC between RI-SUVmax and early SUVmax. In principle, RI-SUVmax must have a merit of not being dependent on scale and is a useful index [2, 31]. Some authors reported RI is a good predictor for diagnosis and prognosis, and is superior to only early imaging [32, 33]. The reason is unknown why RI-SUVmax was not the best predictor, but our results are consistent with that of a previous study [18].

Some institutions, which give a high priority to economic requirements and protection of excessive radiation exposure, may perform only a single scan. In the t test to compare differences between ML and BLN, there was a significant difference between ML and BLN in all indices. According to this result, it may be preferable to use the early SUVmax cut-off value to avoid increased radiation exposure. However, obtaining these dual-time-point scans might have advantages such as discrimination of mesenteric lymph nodes from physiological intestinal accumulations [34] and discrimination of malignant tumors from benign tumors [1722]. Focal FDG foci due to urinary excretion in the ureter can be mistaken as lymphadenopathy close to the ureter, such as ovary, cervix, pancreatic tail and adrenal grand [9, 35]. Co-registration of PET with anatomical imaging may be useful to avoid misinterpretation; however, it is still difficult to differentiate lesions in proximity to urinary activity, especially in a PET/CT study acquired without an intravenous contrast agent. In contrast, additional delayed scanning is a simple option [36]. In addition, the use of delayed SUVmax and D-SUVmax might improve the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of ML.

This study had several limitations. First, the subject population comprised a relatively small number of patients. The smallest group had only one patient, and the small numbers of subjects disturbed the analysis of differences in each histological subtype. Consequently, we performed ROC analysis without comparing each histological subtype. However, some authors have reported that the SUVmax tended to be lower in Hodgkin’s lymphoma and T-cell lymph nodes than in B-cell lymphoma, with differences observed in the early SUVmax [28]. Examination of a larger number of patients in a prospective study could help in evaluating the role of dual-time-point PET/CT scans in diagnosis of lymphoma. Second, the cut-off value obtained in this study was based on the data collected at our institution alone, and the absolute value of SUVmax may vary according to the imaging system used. We intend to address this issue by conducting similar comparisons at multiple institutions in future. Finally, histopathological examination of biopsy samples from all lymph nodes suspected of having F-18 FDG uptake on PET/CT was not performed. However, despite these limitations, our results suggest that the use of dual-time-point PET/CT scans might improve diagnostic capability for lymphoma compared with conventional techniques.


In conclusion, dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT scan is useful for differential diagnosis between ML and BLN, regardless of a variety of the histologic subtype. Dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging may help to consider whether there is any need to proceed to more invasive tests, such as biopsy, in individual patients.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

1.. Jhanwar YS,Straus DJ. The role of PET in lymphomaJ Nucl MedYear: 2006471326133416883013
2.. Shinya T, Fujii S, Asakura S, Taniguchi T, Yoshio K, Alafate A, et al. Dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT for evaluation in patients with malignant lymphoma. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;13 [Epub ahead of print].
3.. Ahmadzadehfar H,Rodrigues M,Zakavi R,Knoll P,Mirzaei S. Prognostic significance of the standardized uptake value of pre-therapeutic (18)F-FDG PET in patients with malignant lymphomaMed OncolYear: 2011281570157610.1007/s12032-010-9584-220524086
4.. Kakhki VR. Positron emission tomography in the management of lung cancerAnn Thorac Med.Year: 20072697610.4103/1817-1737.3223519727351
5.. Schrepfer T,Haerle SK,Strobel K,Schaefer N,Hälg RA,Huber GF. The value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of primary extranodal head and neck lymphomasLaryngoscope.Year: 201012093794420422687
6.. Kapoor V,McCook BM,Torok FS. An introduction to PET-CT imagingRadiographics.Year: 20042452354310.1148/rg.24202572415026598
7.. Tamura M,Oda M,Matsumoto I,Waseda R,Watanabe G. Pattern and predictors of false positive lymph node involvement on positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancerThorac Cardiovasc SurgYear: 20126010511010.1055/s-0031-128006821789758
8.. Castellucci P,Zinzani P,Pourdehnad M,Alinari L,Nanni C,Farsad M,et al. 18F-FDG PET in malignant lymphoma: significance of positive findingsEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.Year: 20053274975610.1007/s00259-004-1748-x15785956
9.. Shreve PD,Anzai Y,Wahl RL. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variantsRadiographics.Year: 19991961779925392
10.. Zhuang H,Pourdehnad M,Lambright ES,Yamamoto AJ,Lanuti M,Li P,et al. Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processesJ Nucl MedYear: 2001421412141711535734
11.. Sonet A,Graux C,Nollevaux MC,Krug B,Bosly A,Vander Borght T. Unsuspected FDG-PET findings in the follow-up of patients with lymphomaAnn HematolYear: 20078691510.1007/s00277-006-0167-417021839
12.. Zinzani PL,Tani M,Trisolini R,et al. Histological verification of positive positron emission tomography findings in the follow-up of patients with mediastinal lymphomaHaematologicaYear: 20079277177710.3324/haematol.1079817550849
13.. Maayan H,Ashkenazi Y,Nagler A,Izbicki G. Sarcoidosis and lymphoma: case series and literature reviewSarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis.Year: 20112814615222117506
14.. Isasi CR,Lu P,Blaufox MD. A metaanalysis of 18F–2-deoxy-2-fluori-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the staging and restaging of patients with lymphomaCancerYear: 20051041066107410.1002/cncr.2125316047335
15.. Zijlstra JM,Lindauer-van der Werf G,Hoekstra OS,Hooft L,Riphagen II,Huijgens PC. 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for post-treatment evaluation of malignant lymphoma: a systematic reviewHaematologicaYear: 20069152252916585017
16.. Hustinx R,Smith RJ,Benard F,Rosenthal DI,Machtay M,Farber LA,et al. Dual-time-point fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: a potential method to differentiate malignancy from inflammation and normal tissue in the head and neckEur J Nucl MedYear: 1999261345134810.1007/s00259005059310541835
17.. Matthies A,Hickeson M,Cuchiara A,Alavi A. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of pulmonary nodulesJ Nucl MedYear: 20024387187512097455
18.. Suga K,Kawakami Y,Hiyama A,Sugi K,Okabe K,Matsumoto T,et al. Differential diagnosis between (18)F-FDG-avid metastatic lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer and benign nodes on dual-time-point PET/CT scanAnn Nucl MedYear: 20092352353110.1007/s12149-009-0268-y19444550
19.. Mavi A,Urhan M,Yu JQ,Zhuang H,Houseni M,Cermik TF,et al. Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET imaging detects breast cancer with high sensitivity and correlates well with histologic subtypesJ Nucl MedYear: 2006471440144616954551
20.. Nakamoto Y,Higashi T,Sakahara H,Tamaki N,Kogire M,Doi R,et al. Delayed (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography scan for differentiation between malignant and benign lesions in the pancreasCancerYear: 2000892547255410.1002/1097-0142(20001215)89:12<2547::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO;2-V11135214
21.. Tian R,Su M,Tian Y,Li F,Li L,Kuang A,et al. Dual-time point PET/CT with F-18 FDG for the differentiation of malignant and benign bone lesionsSkeletal RadiolYear: 20093845145810.1007/s00256-008-0643-019205695
22.. Kumar R,Loving VA,Chauhan A,Zhuang H,Mitchell S,Alavi A. Potential of dual-time-point imaging to improve breast cancer diagnosis with (18)F-FDG PETJ Nucl MedYear: 2005461819182416269595
23.. Hamberg LM,Hunter GJ,Alpert NM,Choi NC,Babich JW,Fischman AJ. The dose uptake ratio as an index of glucose metabolism: useful parameter or oversimplification?J Nucl MedYear: 199435130813128046485
24.. Lodge MA,Lucas JD,Marsden PK,Cronin BF,O’Doherty MJ,Smith MA. A PET study of 18FDG uptake in soft tissue massesEur J Nucl MedYear: 199926223010.1007/s0025900503559933658
25.. Khandani AH,Dunphy CH,Meteesatien P,Dufault DL,Ivanovic M,Shea TC. Glut1 and Glut3 expression in lymphoma and their association with tumor intensity on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographyNucl Med CommunYear: 20093059460110.1097/MNM.0b013e32832cc29519536037
26.. Bedigian MP,Benard F,Smith RJ,Karp JS,Alavi A. Whole-body positron emission tomography for oncology imaging using singles transmission scanning with segmentation and ordered subsets-expectation maximization (OS-EM) reconstructionEur J Nucl MedYear: 1998256596619722421
27.. Papajík T,Mysliveček M,Sedová Z,Buriánková E,Procházka V,Koranda P,et al. Standardised uptake value of 18F-FDG on staging PET/CT in newly diagnosed patients with different subtypes of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomaEur J HaematolYear: 201186323710.1111/j.1600-0609.2010.01532.x20874822
28.. Wu X,Pertovaara H,Korkola P,Vornanen M,Eskola H,Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL. Glucose metabolism correlated with cellular proliferation in diffuse large B-cell lymphomaLeuk LymphomaYear: 20115340040510.3109/10428194.2011.62242021913807
29.. Kubota K,Itoh M,Ozaki K,Ono S,Tashiro M,Yamaguchi K,et al. Advantage of delayed whole-body FDG-PET imaging for tumour detectionEur J Nucl MedYear: 20012869670310.1007/s00259010053711440029
30.. Gupta N,Gill H,Graeber G,Bishop H,Hurst J,Stephens T. Dynamic positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose imaging in differentiation of benign from malignant lung/mediastinal lesionsChestYear: 19981141105111110.1378/chest.114.4.11059792584
31.. Nagamachi S,Hoshi H,Jinnouchi S,Ohnishi T,Flores LG 2nd,Futami S,Nakahara H,et al. 201TL SPECT for evaluating head and neck cancerAnn Nucl MedYear: 19961010511110.1007/BF031650628814712
32.. Lyshchik A,Higashi T,Nakamoto Y,Fujimoto K,Doi R,Imamura M,et al. Dual-phase 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography as a prognostic parameter in patients with pancreatic cancerEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.Year: 20053238939710.1007/s00259-004-1656-015372209
33.. Uesaka D,Demura Y,Ishizaki T,Ameshima S,Miyamori I,Sasaki M,et al. Evaluation of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET for staging in patients with lung cancerJ Nucl MedYear: 2008491606161210.2967/jnumed.108.05125018794269
34.. Chun H,Kim CK,Krynckyi BR,Machac J. The usefulness of a repeat study for differentiating between bowel activity and local tumor recurrence on FDG PET scansClin Nucl MedYear: 20032867267312897657
35.. Cook GJ,Fogelman I,Maisey MN. Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretationSemin Nucl MedYear: 19962630831410.1016/S0001-2998(96)80006-78916319
36.. Miyake KK,Nakamoto Y,Togashi K. Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with colorectal cancer: clinical value of early delayed scanningAnn Nucl MedYear: 20122649250010.1007/s12149-012-0599-y22492392


[Figure ID: Fig1]
Fig. 1 

ROC analysis showed that the D-SUVmax provided a best statistical differentiation between ML and BLN. ROC analysis revealed that the proper cut-off values of early, delayed, D- and RI-SUVmax were 3.0, 4.0, 1.0 and 0.22, respectively (arrows)

[Figure ID: Fig2]
Fig. 2 

Box and whiskers plots showing distribution of early and delayed SUVmax among ML and BLN. The graph showed the distribution of data based on the five number summary: minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum (*P < 0.01, compared with early SUVmax in ML, **P < 0.01, compared with delayed SUVmax in ML)

[Figure ID: Fig3]
Fig. 3 

Box and whiskers plots showing distribution of D-SUVmax and RI-SUVmax among ML and BLN. The graph showed the distribution of data as mentioned in Fig. 2 (*P < 0.01, compared with D-SUVmax in ML, **P < 0.01, compared with RI-SUVmax in ML)

[TableWrap ID: Tab1] Table 1 

Characteristics of malignant lymphoma and benign lymph nodes

Number of patients Number of lesions Early SUVmax (mean ± SD) Delayed SUVmax (mean ± SD) D-SUVmax (mean ± SD) RI-SUVmax (mean ± SD)
Malignant lymphomaa
Histological subtypes of lymphoma
 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma 12 74 7.24 ± 6.18 9.35 ± 7.05 2.11 ± 1.41 0.42 ± 0.24
 Follicular lymphoma 10 70 8.13 ± 5.75 10.18 ± 6.80 2.05 ± 1.56 0.32 ± 0.23
 T-cell lymphoma 5 34 4.19 ± 2.58 5.79 ± 3.01 1.60 ± 0.87 0.43 ± 0.19
 Hodgkin’s lymphoma 2 13 6.44 ± 3.57 8.06 ± 3.67 1.62 ± 0.67 0.30 ± 0.13
 Mantle cell lymphoma 1 4 4.18 ± 0.62 5.28 ± 0.66 1.10 ± 0.19 0.27 ± 0.07
 Total 30 195 6.70 ± 5.43 8.62 ± 6.27 1.91 ± 1.33 0.38 ± 0.23
Benign lymph nodesb
 Reactive lymph node 24 54 3.03 ± 0.90 3.69 ± 1.02 0.65 ± 0.52 0.23 ± 0.20
 Lymphadenitis 10 20 3.88 ± 3.06 5.34 ± 4.04 1.47 ± 2.00 0.34 ± 0.40
 Pneumonia 9 16 2 .88 ± 0 .74 3 .71 ± 1.09 0.82 ± 0.63 0.29 ± 0.20
 Rheumatoid arthritis 3 9 3.26 ± 1.32 3.62 ± 1.15 0.37 ± 0.31 0.16 ± 0.16
 Sarcoidosis 2 5 7.60 ± 4.37 8.26 ± 4.80 0.66 ± 0.89 0.09 ± 0.10
 Silicosis 1 5 2 .60 ± 0 .39 3.66 ± 0.72 1.06 ± 0.60 0.41 ± 0.27
 IgG4-related disease 1 2 3. 50 ± 1. 00 3.80 ± 1.30 0.30 ± 0.30 0.07 ± 0.07
 Tuberculosis 1 1 2.60 3.20 0.60 0.23
 Echinococcus 1 1 4.50 5.60 1.10 0.24
 Benign lung tumor 1 1 1.50 1.90 0.40 0.27
 Benign brain tumor 1 1 4.40 4.80 0.4 0.09
 Total 54 115 3.37 ± 2.43 4.16 ± 2.44 0.80 ± 1.04 0.25 ± 0.25

aSize of lesions: 1.2 cm ± 0.8 in short-axis diameter, range 0.3–2.7 cm

bSize of lesions: 1.0 cm ± 0.5 in short-axis diameter, range 0.3–2.4 cm

[TableWrap ID: Tab2] Table 2 

Diagnostic values for differentiation of ML and BLN with parameters of dual-time-point PET/CT scan

Cut-off value Sensitivity/specificity (%) PPV/NPV (%) AUC
Early SUVmax 3.0 70.8/58.2 74.2/56.8 0.715
Delayed SUVmax 4.0 75.4/60.0 76.2/61.0 0.772*
D-SUVmax 1.0 82.6/65.2 80.1/68.8 0.809*
RI-SUVmax 0.22 72.8/55.7 73.6/58.6 0.684

PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, AUC area under the curve

P < 0.005

[TableWrap ID: Tab3] Table 3 

Visual scoring results: ML versus BLN on dual-time-point scan

Visual score ML (early scan) BLN (early scan) ML (delayed scan) BLN (delayed scan)
0 20 16 18 9
1 38 32 33 42
2 118 57 120 54
3 19 10 24 19
Total 195 115 195 115

Article Categories:
  • Original Article

Keywords: Keywords 18F-FDG PET/CT, Dual-time-point imaging, Lymphoma, Benign lymph node, Standardized uptake value.

Previous Document:  Living donor liver transplantation for Budd-Chiari syndrome with hepatic inferior vena cava obstruct...
Next Document:  Diagnosis of postoperative bile leak and accurate localization of the site of leak by gadobenate dim...