|Does time really slow down during a frightening event?|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 18074019 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|Observers commonly report that time seems to have moved in slow motion during a life-threatening event. It is unknown whether this is a function of increased time resolution during the event, or instead an illusion of remembering an emotionally salient event. Using a hand-held device to measure speed of visual perception, participants experienced free fall for 31 m before landing safely in a net. We found no evidence of increased temporal resolution, in apparent conflict with the fact that participants retrospectively estimated their own fall to last 36% longer than others' falls. The duration dilation during a frightening event, and the lack of concomitant increase in temporal resolution, indicate that subjective time is not a single entity that speeds or slows, but instead is composed of separable subcomponents. Our findings suggest that time-slowing is a function of recollection, not perception: a richer encoding of memory may cause a salient event to appear, retrospectively, as though it lasted longer.|
|Chess Stetson; Matthew P Fiesta; David M Eagleman|
Related Documents :
|24827149 - Tinnitus and other auditory problems - occupational noise exposure below risk limits ma...
23112499 - Identification of awkward postures that cause discomfort to liquid petroleum gas worker...
24843789 - Looking at the other side of the coin: the search for possible biopositive cognitive ef...
23231109 - Exposure modifiers of the relationships of transportation noise with high blood pressur...
16375269 - Transport rates vary with deposition time in dip-pen nanolithography.
23916659 - G-csf attenuates noise-induced hearing loss.
16664319 - Diurnal changes in allocation of newly fixed carbon in exporting sugar beet leaves.
11415639 - Reproducibility of lumbar paraspinal surface electromyogram power spectra.
6691929 - Effects of impulse noise and continuous steady state noise on hearing.
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Date: 2007-12-12|
|Title: PloS one Volume: 2 ISSN: 1932-6203 ISO Abbreviation: PLoS ONE Publication Date: 2007|
|Created Date: 2007-12-12 Completed Date: 2008-08-08 Revised Date: 2014-09-20|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101285081 Medline TA: PLoS One Country: United States|
|Languages: eng Pagination: e1295 Citation Subset: IM|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
|R01 NS053960/NS/NINDS NIH HHS; R01 NS053960/NS/NINDS NIH HHS; R01 NS053960-01A2/NS/NINDS NIH HHS; R01 NS053960-02/NS/NINDS NIH HHS|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): PLoS ONE
Journal ID (publisher-id): plos
Journal ID (pmc): plosone
Publisher: Public Library of Science, San Francisco, USA
Stetson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received Day: 26 Month: 10 Year: 2007
Accepted Day: 6 Month: 11 Year: 2007
collection publication date: Year: 2007
Electronic publication date: Day: 12 Month: 12 Year: 2007
Volume: 2 Issue: 12
E-location ID: e1295
PubMed Id: 18074019
Publisher Id: 07-PONE-RA-02592
|Does Time Really Slow Down during a Frightening Event? Alternate Title:Does Time Slow Down?|
|Matthew P. Fiesta2|
|David M. Eagleman34*|
Role: Academic Editor
1California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America
2Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America
3Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
4Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
|Istituto di Neurofisiologia, Italy
|Correspondence: * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Contributed by footnote: Conceived and designed the experiments: DE CS. Performed the experiments: DE CS. Analyzed the data: DE CS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CS MF. Wrote the paper: DE CS.
Temporal judgments – such as duration, order, and simultaneity – are subject to distortions . For example, perceived durations can be warped by saccades ,  or by an oddball in a sequence . Temporal order judgments of actions and sensations can be illusorily reversed by exposure to delayed motor consequences , and simultaneity judgments can be manipulated by repeated exposure to non-simultaneous stimuli . Distortions in interval timing can be induced by narcotics such as cocaine and marijuana , as well as by disorders such as schizophrenia  and Parkinson's disease .
However, an open question is whether subjective time is a unitary phenomenon, or instead whether it is underpinned by separate neural mechanisms that usually work in concert but can be dissociated under the right circumstances. In other words, when one temporal judgment changes, do the others necessarily follow suit?
To address this question, we turned to the common anecdotal report that time seems to have slowed down during a life-threatening situation (such as a car accident). The experimental question, for the present purposes, is what it might mean for ‘time’ to move in slow motion. If time as a single unified entity can slow down – the way it does in movies – then this slow motion should entail consequences such as an ability to perceive events with higher temporal resolution. For example, watching a hummingbird in video slow motion allows finer temporal discrimination upon replay at normal speed because more snapshots are taken of the rapidly beating wings. To test whether humans experience increased temporal resolution during frightening events, we designed an experiment in which participants could accurately detect a visual stimulus only if they were experiencing supra-normal temporal resolution.
We leveraged the fact that the visual brain integrates over a small window of time. If two or more stimuli arrive within a single window of integration (usually ∼80 msec), they are perceived as a single stimulus . As an illustration of this principle, a child's toy known as a thaumatrope has, for example, a picture of a bird on one side of a disc and a picture of a tree branch on the other; when the disc is wound up and spun quickly so that both sides are seen in rapid alternation, the bird appears to be resting on the branch. Because the stimuli are alternating so rapidly that the visual system cannot distinguish them temporally; they are seen as though simultaneously present.
We applied this characteristic of the visual system to the perception of rapidly alternating digits. When shown a digit and its negative image at a slow rate of alternation (Fig. 1a), participants have no trouble identifying it. As the rate of alternation increases, a sharp threshold is reached after which the information is presented too rapidly and the digit can no longer be discriminated from a uniform display (Fig. 1b) – that is, at a high rate of alternation the images perceptually overlap as though they were presented simultaneously.
Using this technique of rapid alternation, we were able to measure a participant's temporal threshold both before and during a frightening event to determine if there was any change in resolution. We engineered a portable device (the “perceptual chronometer”, Fig. 1c) which contains 2 LED arrays and a programmable microchip that presents randomized digital numbers and their negatives at adjustable rates. Participants watched a briefly presented (∼2 sec), rapidly alternating pair of digits on the perceptual chronometer, and, for different alternation frequencies, attempted to verbally report the digits they perceived. The temporal resolution of the viewer determined whether the digits were identifiable or not.
To establish temporal thresholds, each participant was asked to report the numbers shown on the device, starting with a slow repetition frequency. Upon correct digit identification, we randomized the digits and increased the alternation frequency by decreasing the period 6 ms. The threshold was identified as the frequency at which a participant was unable to correctly identify randomized numbers after 3 consecutive presentations. We tested 13 participants during the daytime and 7 at nighttime and found average threshold periods of 47.4±13 ms and 33.4±9 ms, respectively.
After obtaining thresholds, we harnessed participants safely to a platform which was then winched 46 m off the ground to the apex of a Suspended Catch Air Device (SCAD) tower (Fig. 1d). The chronometer was strapped to the participant's forearm like a wristwatch, and was programmed to display a random number alternating at a period 6 ms faster than their determined threshold. Participants were released from the top of the tower and experienced free fall for 2.49 s before landing safely in a net. During the fall, they attempted to read the digits for subsequent report. If higher temporal resolution were experienced during the freefall, the alternation rate should appear slowed, thus allowing for the accurate reporting of numbers that would otherwise be unreadable.
One of the two experimenters remained on the platform to monitor for eye closure. One participant who closed her eyes for the entire free fall was excluded from the study; all others kept their eyes open during at least part of the freefall.
Upon landing in the net, participants verbally reported the displayed number; if they were unsure, they were asked to deliver their best guess. The displayed number was verified by the experimenters by slowing the display to an easily readable alternation rate, and answers were scored for accuracy (correct reporting of both digits = 100%, one digit = 50%, neither = 0%).
Additionally, 7 participants made duration judgments. After watching another participant take the freefall, but before they took the freefall themselves, we asked these participants to imagine being released from the top and then falling through the air until they hit the net. At the moment when they pictured their release from the top, they were to press the start button on a stopwatch; at the time that they imagined hitting the net, they were to press the stop button. We repeated the same measurement just after they experienced the free fall themselves, this time asking them to remember being released from the top and estimate how long it took until they hit the net.
To avoid incentivization, participants were not compensated except for the cost of the SCAD dive. All participants gave written informed consent as approved by the IRB at the University of Texas, Houston Medical School.
Using the retrospective stopwatch estimation, participants' duration estimates increased by an average of 36% when they recalled their own fall (from 2.17±0.24 s to 2.96±0.51 s, p<0.03, paired t-test, one-tailed, Fig. 2a), consistent with their verbal report that their fall had “seemed to take a very long time”.
But was there a concomitant increase in temporal resolution? For a flickering display such as the one in this experiment, participants typically exhibit a sharp threshold between frame rates at which they can perceive the stimulus, and frame rates at which they cannot (around 3 ms, determined in a separate experiment). Therefore, we would expect that when measuring near their baseline threshold, a small increase in a participants' temporal resolution would translate into a large increase in perceptual performance. By fitting a psychometric curve to participants' pre-jump data, and then shifting it by the amount predicted by a 36% speed-up of their temporal resolution, we obtained an estimate of the perceptual performance we might expect during the free fall. The mean expected performance (measured as correct digit identification) is plotted in Figure 2b, along with the actual performance. In a control experiment, we repeated the experimental procedure, but participants remained on the ground. The mean in-flight performance was much less than what we predicted, and no different from the ground-based control (p = 0.98). Thus, while duration estimates increase during a high-fear situation (Fig. 2a), the lack of a matching increase in perceptual performance (Fig. 2b) indicates that duration estimates are not directly linked to temporal resolution.
We have tested whether the subjective duration increase of a frightening event is due to increased temporal resolution (as from the speeding of a camera) or instead whether duration distortions do not necessarily entail the expected consequences of a unitary time slowing down. Understanding how and why duration estimations change constrains neural models of time representation, some of which are turning to the question of whether the representation of time can speed or slow , , .
Participants free-falling from 50 meters experienced a duration expansion, yet they did not gain increased discrimination capacities in the time domain. This finding supports the hypothesis that subjective time is not unitary, and is consistent with the finding that flicker rates and the pitches of sounds do not lower during subjective duration dilations , as would be expected during slow motion in movies.
A critical point for the logic of this study is that flicker fusion frequencies are not limited by the retina, since retinal ganglion cells have extremely high temporal resolution. For example, in cat retinal ganglion cells, temporal resolution is ∼95 Hz for X cells and ∼120 Hz for Y cells under photopic illumination . In primates, neurons in temporal cortex are able to temporally follow complex stimuli presented at 72 Hz . Additionally, given the effect of many medications on the psychophysical flicker fusion frequency , it is clear that the limits of temporal resolution are central, not peripheral.
Therefore, at this stage there is no evidence to support the hypothesis that subjective time as a whole runs in slow motion during frightening events. Rather, we speculate that the involvement of the amygdala in emotional memory may lead to dilated duration judgments retrospectively, due to a richer, and perhaps secondary encoding of the memories –. Upon later readout, such highly salient events may be erroneously interpreted to have spanned a greater period of time.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: NIH RO1 NS053960 and Army Research Laboratory Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-07-2-0023
We thank Donald Vaughn, Jesse Callus, and the staff at Zero Gravity in Dallas for help with running the experiment.
|1.||Eagleman DM,Tse PU,Buonomano D,Janssen P,Nobre AC,et al. 2005;Time and the brain: how subjective time relates to neural time.J Neurosci 25:10369–10371. [pmid: 16280574]|
|2.||Yarrow K,Haggard P,Heal R,Brown P,Rothwell JC. 2001;Illusory perceptions of space and time preserve cross-saccadic perceptual continuity.Nature 414:302–305. [pmid: 11713528]|
|3.||Morrone MC,Ross J,Burr D. 2005;Saccadic eye movements cause compression of time as well as space.Nat Neurosci 8:950–954. [pmid: 15965472]|
|4.||Tse PU,Intriligator J,Rivest J,Cavanagh P. 2004;Attention and the subjective expansion of time.Perception & psychophysics 66:1171–1189. [pmid: 15751474]|
|5.||Stetson C,Cui X,Montague PR,Eagleman DM. 2006;Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation.Neuron 51:651–659. [pmid: 16950162]|
|6.||Fujisaki W,Shimojo S,Kashino M,Nishida S. 2004;Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity.Nat Neurosci 7:773–778. [pmid: 15195098]|
|7.||Buhusi CV,Meck WH. 2005;What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing.Nature reviews 6:755–765.|
|8.||Davalos DB,Kisley MA,Ross RG. 2003;Effects of interval duration on temporal processing in schizophrenia.Brain Cogn 52:295–301. [pmid: 12907174]|
|9.||Riesen JM,Schnider A. 2001;Time estimation in Parkinson's disease: normal long duration estimation despite impaired short duration discrimination.J Neurol 248:27–35. [pmid: 11266017]|
|10.||Di Lollo V. 1977;Temporal Characteristics of Iconic Memory.Nature 267|
|11.||Matell MS,King GR,Meck WH. 2004;Differential modulation of clock speed by the administration of intermittent versus continuous cocaine.Behavioral neuroscience 118:150–156. [pmid: 14979791]|
|12.||Yamazaki T,Tanaka S. 2005;Neural modeling of an internal clock.Neural computation 17:1032–1058. [pmid: 15829099]|
|13.||Pariyadath V,Eagleman DM. 2007The effect of predictability on subjective duration. Under review.|
|14.||Frishman LJ,Freeman AW,Troy JB,Schweitzer-Tong DE,Enroth-Cugell C. 1987;Spatiotemporal frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells.The Journal of general physiology 89:599–628. [pmid: 3585279]|
|15.||Keysers C,Xiao DK,Foldiak P,Perrett DI. 2001;The speed of sight.Journal of cognitive neuroscience 13:90–101. [pmid: 11224911]|
|16.||Curran S,Wattis J. 2000;Critical flicker fusion threshold: a potentially useful measure for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease.Hum Psychopharmacol 15:103–112. [pmid: 12404339]|
|17.||Fanselow MS,Gale GD. 2003;The amygdala, fear, and memory.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 985:125–134. [pmid: 12724154]|
|18.||Hamann SB,Ely TD,Grafton ST,Kilts CD. 1999;Amygdala activity related to enhanced memory for pleasant and aversive stimuli.Nat Neurosci 2:289–293. [pmid: 10195224]|
|19.||Cahill L,Babinsky R,Markowitsch HJ,McGaugh JL. 1995;The amygdala and emotional memory.Nature 377:295–296. [pmid: 7566084]|
|20.||Olsson A,Phelps EA. 2007;Social learning of fear.Nat Neurosci 10:1095–1102. [pmid: 17726475]|
Previous Document: What causes partial F1 hybrid viability? Incomplete penetrance versus genetic variation.
Next Document: Global patterns in seasonal activity of influenza A/H3N2, A/H1N1, and B from 1997 to 2005: viral coe...