Document Detail


Does pressure matter in creating burns in a porcine model?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20616654     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Multiple animal models of burn injury have been reported, and only some of these have been fully validated. One of the most popular approaches is burn infliction by direct contact with the heat source. Previous investigators have reported that the pressure of application of the contact burn infliction device does not affect the depth of injury. We hypothesized that the depth of injury would increase with increasing pressure of application in a porcine burn model. Forty mid-dermal contact burns measuring 25 x 25 mm were created on the back and flanks of an anesthetized domestic pig (50 kg) using a brass bar preheated in 80 degrees C water for a period of 30 or 20 seconds. The bars were applied using a spring-loaded device designed to control the amount of pressure applied to the skin. The pressures applied by the brass bar were gravity (0.2 kg), 2.0, 2.7, 3.8, and 4.5 kg in replicates of eight. One hour later, 8-mm full-thickness biopsies were obtained for histologic analysis using Elastic Van Gieson staining by a board-certified dermatopathologist masked to burn conditions. The depth of complete and partial collagen injury was measured from the level of the basement membrane using a microscopic micrometer measuring lens. Groups were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). The association between depth of injury and pressure was determined with Pearson correlations. The mean (95% confidence interval) depths of complete collagen injury with 30-second exposures were as follows: gravity only, 0.51 (0.39-0.66) mm; 2.0 kg, 0.72 (0.55-0.88) mm; 2.7 kg, 0.68 (0.55-1.00) mm; 3.8 kg, 0.92 (0.80-1.00) mm; and 4.5 kg, 1.65 (1.55-1.75) mm. The differences in depth of injury between the various pressure groups were significant (ANOVA, P < .001). The mean (95% confidence interval) depths of partial collagen injury were as follows: gravity only, 1.10 (0.92-1.30) mm; 2.0 kg, 1.46 (1.28-1.63) mm; 2.7 kg, 1.51 (1.34-1.64) mm; 3.8 kg, 1.82 (1.71-1.94) mm; and 4.5 kg, 2.50 (2.39-2.62) mm; and ANOVA, P = .001. The associations between pressure of application and depth of complete and partial collagen injury were 0.73 (P < .001) and 0.65 (P < .001), respectively. There is a direct association between the pressure of burn device application and depth of injury. Future studies should standardize and specify the amount of pressure applied using the burn infliction device.
Authors:
Adam J Singer; Breena R Taira; Ryon Anderson; Steve A McClain; Lior Rosenberg
Related Documents :
10511654 - Brachial artery reactivity: a modified technique with applicability to children.
12528094 - Exaggerated cardiovascular effects of cocaine in conscious dogs with pacing-induced dil...
1618234 - A method of computerised isotope dynamic proctography.
1248084 - Measurement of foot artery blood pressure by micromanometry in normal subjects and in p...
8328424 - Effects of intraduodenal administration of "kyushin," a senso (toad venom)-containing d...
352184 - Metoclopramide and the gastro-oesophageal sphincter. a study in pregnant women with hea...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association     Volume:  31     ISSN:  1559-0488     ISO Abbreviation:  J Burn Care Res     Publication Date:    2010 Jul-Aug
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-07-09     Completed Date:  2010-10-29     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101262774     Medline TA:  J Burn Care Res     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  646-51     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Burns / pathology*
Confidence Intervals
Disease Models, Animal*
Female
Pressure
Random Allocation
Swine

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Evaluation of a New Circuit Configuration for the VDR-4(R) High-Frequency Percussive Ventilator.
Next Document:  Decreased pulmonary inflammation after ethanol exposure and burn injury in intercellular adhesion mo...