Document Detail


Does motion perception follow Weber's law?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  7675617     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The subjective strength of a percept often depends on the stimulus intensity in a nonlinear way. Such coding is often reflected by the observation that the just-noticeable difference between two stimulus intensities (JND) is proportional to the absolute stimulus intensity. This behaviour, which is usually referred to as Weber's Law, can be interpreted as a compressive nonlinearity extending the operating range of a sensory system. When the noise superimposed on a motion stimulus is increased along a logarithmic scale (in order to provide linear steps in subjective difference) in motion-coherency measurements, observers often report that the subjective differences between the various noise levels increase together with the absolute level. This observation could indicate a deviation from Weber's Law for variation of motion strength as obtained by changing the signal-to-noise ratio in random-dot kinematograms. Thus JNDs were measured for the superposition of uncorrelated random-dot patterns on static random-dot patterns and three types of motion stimuli realised as random-dot kinematograms, namely large-field and object 'Fourier' motion (all or a group of dots move coherently), 'drift-balanced' motion (a travelling region of static dots), and paradoxical 'theta' motion (the dots on the surface of an object move in opposite direction to the object itself). For all classes of stimuli, the JNDs when expressed as differences in signal-to-noise ratio turned out to increase with the signal-to-noise ratio, whereas the JNDs given as percentage of superimposed noise appear to be similar for all tested noise levels. Thus motion perception is in accordance with Weber's Law when the signal-to-noise ratio is regarded as stimulus intensity, which in turn appears to be coded in a nonlinear fashion. In general the Weber fractions are very large, indicating a poor differential sensitivity in signal-to-noise measurements.
Authors:
J M Zanker
Related Documents :
8229817 - Observations on human tactile directional sensibility.
7304237 - Motion mechanisms in strobe-reared cats: psychophysical and electrophysical measures.
704277 - Illusory dilatation of square surfaces.
963197 - Chemotropism indices for polymorphonuclear leukocytes.
18002897 - A laser doppler system for intracerebral measurements during stereotactic neurosurgery.
18064917 - Tactile cueing effects on performance in simulated aerial combat with high acceleration.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Perception     Volume:  24     ISSN:  0301-0066     ISO Abbreviation:  Perception     Publication Date:  1995  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1995-10-17     Completed Date:  1995-10-17     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372307     Medline TA:  Perception     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  363-72     Citation Subset:  IM; S    
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Biologische Kybernetik, Tübingen, Germany.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Acceleration
Attention*
Differential Threshold
Discrimination Learning*
Fourier Analysis
Humans
Motion Perception*
Orientation
Pattern Recognition, Visual*
Psychomotor Performance
Psychophysics

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Dichoptic and physical information combination: a comparison.
Next Document:  The theory of the curvature-constraint line for amodal completion.