Document Detail


Does the defining issues test measure ethical judgment ability or political position?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21675184     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This article addresses the construct validity of the Defining Issues Test of ethical judgment (DIT/DIT-2). Alleging a political bias in the test, Emler and colleagues (1983, 1998, 1999, 2007), show that conservatives score higher when asked to fake as liberals, implying that they understand the reasoning associated with "higher" moral development but avoid items they see as liberally biased. DIT proponents challenge the internal validity of faking studies, advocating an explained-variance validation. This study takes a new approach: Adult participants complete the DIT-2, then evaluate the raw responses of others to discern political orientation and ethical development. Results show that individuals scoring higher on the DIT-2 rank others' ethical judgment in a way consistent with DIT-2-based rankings. Accuracy at assessing political orientation, however, is low. Results support the DIT-2's validity as a measure of ethical development, not an expression of political position.
Authors:
Charles D Bailey
Related Documents :
22398414 - Liberty or death; don't tread on me.
21782154 - Guidelines of the french society of endocrinology for the management of thyroid nodules.
21961894 - Publication patterns of oral and poster presentations at the annual meetings of the con...
22088234 - Ethical concerns and career satisfaction in obstetrics and gynecology: a review of rece...
15876764 - Ethical issues in pediatric intensive care in developing countries: combining western t...
10114114 - "do not resuscitate" orders: the new york statutory model--part i.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of social psychology     Volume:  151     ISSN:  0022-4545     ISO Abbreviation:  J Soc Psychol     Publication Date:    2011 May-Jun
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-06-15     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376372     Medline TA:  J Soc Psychol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  314-30     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
University of Memphis, Fogelman College of Business and Economics, School of Accountancy, 3665 Central Ave., Memphis, TN 38152, USA. cbailey2@memphis.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Costs and benefits of autonomy when learning a task: an experimental approach.
Next Document:  Still stable after all these years: perceptions of sexual harassment in academic contexts.