Document Detail


Does the Measurement of the Difference of Resistive Indexes in Spleen and Kidney Allow a Selective Assessment of Chronic Kidney Injury?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22771884     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Purpose:To determine whether the difference of resistive indexes (RIs) in spleen and kidney (DI-RISK) is a more specific ultrasonographic (US) marker of intrarenal parenchymal damage than intrarenal RI alone.Materials and Methods:The study was approved by the local ethics committee. All study participants provided informed consent. The authors defined standard values for renal RI, splenic RI, and DI-RISK in 152 healthy subjects; carotid intima media thickness (IMT) was assessed as a marker of systemic vascular disease. Next, the authors measured these US parameters and collected echocardiographic data in 290 patients with chronic kidney disease (stage 2-4) recruited between September 2008 and February 2011 to evaluate the DI-RISK across the spectrum of stages of kidney function. Correlation coefficients were calculated with the Spearman test, and multivariate linear regression was used to analyze independent predictors of renal RI, splenic RI, and DI-RISK.Results:Healthy subjects had a mean age of 34.3 years ± 8.7, and patients with chronic kidney disease had a mean age of 65.0 years ± 12.3 (P < .001). In healthy subjects, both renal and splenic RIs were associated with IMT (renal RI: r = 0.19, P = .022; splenic RI: r = 0.23, P = .005); there was no correlation between DI-RISK and IMT (r = - 0.10, P = .215). Similarly, in patients with chronic kidney disease, renal and splenic RIs correlated with IMT (renal RI: r = 0.33, P < .001; splenic RI: r = 0.30, P = .001). DI-RISK was associated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; r =- 0.19, P = .001) but not with IMT (r = 0.08, P = .174). At multivariate regression analysis, DI-RISK was independently associated with eGFR but not with extrarenal factors.Conclusion:In patients with chronic kidney disease, renal RIs do not selectively indicate organ damage, but also mirror systemic vascular disease. The authors introduced DI-RISK as a potential US marker that may more specifically reflect kidney damage.© RSNA, 2012.
Authors:
Oliver S Grün; Esther Herath; Anja Weihrauch; Franziska Flügge; Kyrill S Rogacev; Danilo Fliser; Gunnar H Heine
Related Documents :
12795664 - Histopathological study of renal transplant artery stenosis: role of rejection and cold...
22406664 - Commercial kidney transplantation: trends, outcomes and challenges-a single-centre expe...
18044574 - New motion correction models for automatic identification of renal transplant rejection.
22680304 - Hair dye related acute kidney injury - a clinical and experimental study.
18713264 - The evolving notion of "senior" kidney transplant recipients.
983764 - Kidney size in children with unilateral urinary duplication.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-7-6
Journal Detail:
Title:  Radiology     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1527-1315     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-7-9     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401260     Medline TA:  Radiology     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine IV-Nephrology and Hypertension, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Strasse, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Visualization of hepatic uptake transporter function in healthy subjects by using gadoxetic acid-enh...
Next Document:  Percent Change of Perfusion Skewness and Kurtosis: A Potential Imaging Biomarker for Early Treatment...