Document Detail


Doctors' willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23793694     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to (1) evaluate the extent to which doctors in New Zealand would be willing to answer honestly questions about their care of patients at the end of their lives and (2) identify the assurances that would encourage this. Results were compared with findings from a previous pilot study from the UK.
DESIGN: Survey study involving a mailed questionnaire.
SETTING: New Zealand hospital and community-based medical care settings.
PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 800 doctors in New Zealand who were vocationally registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand in disciplines involving caring for patients at the end of their lives.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Willingness to provide honest answers about various aspects of end-of-life care; assurances that might increase willingness to provide honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices.
RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 436 doctors. The majority of respondents (59.9-91.5%) indicated willingness to provide honest answers to such questions. However, more than a third of doctors were unwilling to give honest answers to certain questions regarding euthanasia. These results are comparable with the UK data. Complete anonymity was the assurance most likely to encourage honest answering, with most of the respondents preferring the use of anonymous written replies. Respondents were less reassured by survey endorsements from regulatory bodies. Themes in free comments included the deterrent effect of medicolegal consequences, fear of censure from society, peers and the media and concerns about the motivations and potential uses of such research.
CONCLUSIONS: Many New Zealand doctors were willing to give honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices, particularly if anonymity was guaranteed; others, however, expressed doubts or indicated that they would not be willing to provide honest answers to questions of this sort.
Authors:
Alan F Merry; Magdi Moharib; Daniel A Devcich; M Louise Webster; Jonathan Ives; Heather Draper
Related Documents :
24827834 - Utilization and determinants of palliative care in the trauma intensive care unit: resu...
24084804 - Medicare reform and primary care concerns for future physicians.
24674154 - Influence of health locus of control on recovery of function in recently hospitalized f...
24447344 - Prevalence of neurological conditions across the continuum of care based on interrai as...
10301834 - Medicare program; selected performance information on hospitals providing care to medic...
18842974 - Systems ambiguity and guideline compliance: a qualitative study of how intensive care u...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2013-05-28
Journal Detail:
Title:  BMJ open     Volume:  3     ISSN:  2044-6055     ISO Abbreviation:  BMJ Open     Publication Date:  2013  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-06-24     Completed Date:  2013-06-25     Revised Date:  2013-11-25    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101552874     Medline TA:  BMJ Open     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluatio...
Next Document:  Exercise referral for drug users aged 40 and over: results of a pilot study in the UK.