Document Detail

Distinguishing hospital complications of care from pre-existing conditions.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15059984     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: To compare cases identified through the Complications Screening Program (CSP) as complications with cases using the same ICD-9 secondary diagnosis codes, where the identifying diagnosis is also indicated as not present at admission. DESIGN: Observational study comparing two sources of potential hospital complications: published computer algorithms applied to coded diagnosis data versus a secondary diagnosis indicator, which distinguishes pre-existing from hospital-developed conditions. SETTING: All patients discharged from Mayo Clinic Rochester hospitals during 1998 and 1999. The Mayo Clinic is a large integrated delivery system in southeastern Minnesota, USA, providing services ranging from local, primary care to tertiary care for referral patients. Approximately 35% of Mayo patients travel >200 km for medical care. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Hospital patients (total = 84 436). The numbers of cases with complications ranged from 0 to 2444 per algorithm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percent of algorithm complication cases indicated as developing in the hospital, and percent of acquired conditions of that type detected by the computer algorithms. Incremental hospital charges, length of stay (LOS) and mortality associated with acquired complications. RESULTS: The percent of cases identified through the computer algorithm that were also coded as acquired varied from 8.8% to 100%. The ability of the computer algorithms to detect acquired conditions of that type also varied greatly, from 2% to 99%. Incremental charges and LOS were significant for patients with acquired complications except for hip fracture/falls. Many acquired complications also increased hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates based strictly on standard discharge abstracts have limited use for inter-hospital comparisons due to large variability in coding across hospitals and the insensitivity of existing computer algorithms to exclude conditions present on admission from true complications. However, complications do carry high costs, including extended stays and increased hospital mortality. Enhancing secondary diagnoses with a simple indicator identifying which diagnoses were present on admission greatly increases the accurate identification of complications for internal quality and patient safety improvements.
James M Naessens; Todd R Huschka
Related Documents :
15302494 - Laparoscopic varicocele ligation: are there advantages compared with the microscopic su...
22538684 - Effectiveness of electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices versus other electrother...
24337654 - Staged gastroschisis closure using alexis wound retractor: first experiences.
10317914 - Outpatient surgery: its perils and prospects.
21399244 - Laparoscoscopic synchronous bilateral adrenalectomy.
24114744 - Longer length baha™ abutments decrease wound complications and revision surgery.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care / ISQua     Volume:  16 Suppl 1     ISSN:  1353-4505     ISO Abbreviation:  Int J Qual Health Care     Publication Date:  2004 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-04-02     Completed Date:  2004-07-22     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9434628     Medline TA:  Int J Qual Health Care     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  i27-35     Citation Subset:  IM    
Divisions of Health Care Policy & Research and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Disease / etiology*
Health Services Research
International Classification of Diseases
Quality Indicators, Health Care

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Using clinical indicators in a quality improvement programme targeting cardiac care.
Next Document:  Using indicators to quantify the potential to improve the quality of health care.