Document Detail


Distinction between isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in breast cancer: is it reliable and useful?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18286534     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: In routine practice, the distinction between isolated tumor cells (ITC) and micrometastases (MIC) in patients with breast cancer is sometimes difficult to discern. The authors assessed differences in classifying patients according to the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) and the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) definitions and method of sizing. METHODS: We assessed the characteristics of metastatic deposits in only 1 involved lymph node in 337 patients with operable breast cancer (median follow-up, 15.3 years). When sizing multiple clusters, either the diameter of the area with close clusters (Method 1) or the size of the largest cluster (Method 2) was taken into account. Patients were classified and their survival was assessed according to the 2 sizing methods and the criteria used for definitions (size in AJCC; size and topography in UICC). RESULTS: With the AJCC definitions, 32 patients would be differently classified according to the method of sizing. With the UICC definitions, some patients with parenchymal ITC would be classified as pN1mi, 38 by Method 1 and 53 by Method 2. Some pathologists would classify the 66 patients who had isolated capsular vascular invasion as pN0. Classification was uncertain in 136 (40%) to 151 (45 %) patients. Survival was not significantly different between pN0(i+) and pN1(mi) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The distinction between ITC and MIC was often difficult and without any prognostic significance. Precise guidelines are more useful for staging than for therapy. Thus, complete axillary dissection is usually performed in pN0(i+) and pN1(mi) patients, whereas chemotherapy is not indicated or debatable when MIC is the only 1 pejorative criterion.
Authors:
Isabelle de Mascarel; Gaetan MacGrogan; Marc Debled; Veronique Brouste; Louis Mauriac
Related Documents :
10976894 - Local recurrence after mastectomy and adjuvant cmf: implications for adjuvant radiation...
14961194 - Prognostic significance of apex axillary invasion for locoregional recurrence and effec...
15735114 - Size of breast cancer metastases in axillary lymph nodes: clinical relevance of minimal...
12408374 - Prognostic value of residual node involvement in operable breast cancer after induction...
16628414 - Evaluation of the prognostic significance of androgen receptor expression in metastatic...
14600944 - Simultaneous radiotherapy and radioimmunotherapy of malignant gliomas with anti-egfr an...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Cancer     Volume:  112     ISSN:  0008-543X     ISO Abbreviation:  Cancer     Publication Date:  2008 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-04-10     Completed Date:  2008-05-30     Revised Date:  2008-11-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0374236     Medline TA:  Cancer     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1672-8     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Institute Bergonie, Bordeaux, France. Mascarel@bergonie.org
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Breast Neoplasms / pathology*
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast / pathology*,  secondary
Carcinoma, Lobular / pathology,  secondary
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes / pathology*
Lymphatic Metastasis / pathology
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplastic Cells, Circulating / pathology*
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Survival Rate

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Dying with cancer: the influence of age, comorbidity, and cancer site.
Next Document:  Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients: a stu...