Document Detail

Distal radial fractures in the elderly: operative compared with nonoperative treatment.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20686059     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: There is much debate regarding the optimal treatment of displaced, unstable distal radial fractures in the elderly. The purpose of this retrospective review was to compare outcomes for elderly patients with a displaced distal radial fracture who were treated with or without surgical intervention. METHODS: This case-control study examined ninety patients over the age of sixty-five who were treated with or without surgery for a displaced distal radial fracture. All fractures were initially treated with closed reduction and splinting. Patients who failed an acceptable closed reduction were offered surgical intervention. Patients who did not undergo surgery were treated until healing with cast immobilization. Patients who underwent surgery were treated with either plate-and-screw fixation or external fixation. Baseline radiographs and functional scores were obtained prior to treatment. Follow-up was conducted at two, six, twelve, twenty-four, and fifty-two weeks. Clinical and radiographic follow-up was completed at each visit, while functional scores were obtained at the twelve, twenty-four, and fifty-two-week follow-up evaluations. Outcomes at fixed time points were compared between groups with standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with a mean age of seventy-six years were treated nonoperatively, and forty-four patients with a mean age of seventy-three years were treated operatively. Other than age, there was no difference with respect to baseline demographics between the cohorts. At twenty-four weeks, patients who underwent surgery had better wrist extension (p = 0.04) than those who had not had surgery. At one year, this difference was not seen. No difference in functional status based on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores and pain scores at any of the follow-up points was seen between the groups. Grip strength at one year was significantly better in the operative group. Radiographic outcome was superior for the patients in the operative group at each follow-up interval. There was no difference between the groups with regard to complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that minor limitations in the range of wrist motion and diminished grip strength, as seen with nonoperative care, do not seem to limit functional recovery at one year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
K A Egol; M Walsh; S Romo-Cardoso; Seth Dorsky; N Paksima
Related Documents :
25232419 - Effects of hypertonic saline - hydroxyethyl starch and mannitol on serum osmolality, du...
22124309 - Intracranial hemorrhage associated with vitamin k deficiency bleeding in biliary atresi...
16137809 - Kudo total elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. clinical and radiological results.
25262159 - Early referral for ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia is associated with ...
25302789 - Efficacy of computer-controlled repositioning procedure for benign paroxysmal positiona...
25410249 - Acute stroke patients treated with stent retrievers in carotid "t" occlusions have impr...
15041489 - Therapeutic ultrasound to stimulate osteoconduction; a placebo controlled single blind ...
20180719 - Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early re...
11033919 - Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions results in 16 cases.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume     Volume:  92     ISSN:  1535-1386     ISO Abbreviation:  J Bone Joint Surg Am     Publication Date:  2010 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-08-05     Completed Date:  2010-09-14     Revised Date:  2010-10-25    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0014030     Medline TA:  J Bone Joint Surg Am     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1851-7     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, Suite 1401, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Case-Control Studies
Chi-Square Distribution
Fracture Fixation / methods*
Linear Models
Osteoarthritis / etiology
Pain Measurement
Radius Fractures / surgery*,  therapy*
Treatment Outcome
Comment In:
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Aug 4;92(9):e11   [PMID:  20686054 ]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2010 Sep;148(5):510   [PMID:  20931699 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  The rising incidence of acromioplasty.
Next Document:  Reassessment of Computerized Wear Measurement for Total Hip Arthroplasty with Correction for Project...