Document Detail


Discussing Driving Concerns With Older Patients: II. Vision Care Providers' Approaches to Assessment.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23044617     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES To characterize situations that prompt vision care providers (VCPs) to ask about their older patients' driving, the types of information they consider, and the factors that influence these inquiries. METHODS A survey was conducted among a random sample of 500 VCPs who were active members of their Michigan professional organizations and had patients 65 years or older in their practice. Factors associated with the survey responses were identified using ordinal logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Survey results were obtained from 404 respondents (80.8%). Common situations that prompted VCPs to ask patients about driving included poor visual function, inquiries from the patient or family, and requests from the state. Visual acuity and peripheral vision testing were frequently relied on (performed always or often by >80% of VCPs), but other ocular test results and nonocular information were infrequently obtained. Questioning about night driving, reading road signs, and experiencing glare were frequent, but inquiries about driving tasks (eg, making left turns) were infrequent. The likelihood of asking about specific driving tasks was significantly greater with more time in practice and with a higher percentage of older patients in their practice, and the likelihood was significantly less for ophthalmologist specialists vs optometrists. CONCLUSIONS Vision care providers are often placed in a primary role of advising older patients about their ability to drive safely or legally. The most frequent tests they use fail to capture the complexities of visual function that contribute to safe driving. The driving tasks about which they usually inquire include some, but not all, tasks commonly associated with crash risk. Educating VCPs on useful resources, tests, and questions is needed.
Authors:
David C Musch; Nancy K Janz; Rebecca L Leinberger; Leslie M Niziol; Brenda W Gillespie
Related Documents :
23350867 - Associations between visual, hearing, and dual sensory impairments and history of motor...
17592987 - Cognitive functioning under stress: evidence from informal caregivers of palliative pat...
930817 - A method for evaluating the biomechanical stresses resulting from manual materials hand...
18037017 - What is it that a neurobiological model of ptsd must explain?
23196637 - Facial self-imitation: objective measurement reveals no improvement without visual feed...
22390267 - The physical burdens of secrecy.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-10-8
Journal Detail:
Title:  Archives of ophthalmology     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1538-3601     ISO Abbreviation:  Arch. Ophthalmol.     Publication Date:  2012 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-9     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7706534     Medline TA:  Arch Ophthalmol     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  1-6     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Manual No-fold Push-in DSAEK Graft Insertion Technique.
Next Document:  Blood Salvage Produces Higher Total Blood Product Costs in Single-Level Lumbar Spine Surgery.