Document Detail


Disability, ambivalence, and the law.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22292211     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
In this Article, I advance a new frame through which to organize discourse on disability and the law: the notion of ambivalence. I make two claims, one descriptive and one normative. Descriptively, I argue that ambivalence pervades encounters with disability. Disability attracts because it is a force that makes us human and disability repels because it is a force that threatens our humanity. The tension between these sentiments is not easily tolerated and tends to prompt denials of ambivalence; we embrace a conscious view of disability that belies our mixed sentiments and we suppress reactions to disability that conflict with this conscious view. Normatively, I argue that the law should express and expose ambivalence about disability. When we deny ambivalence, I argue, we cannot account for our genuine sentiments and we cannot prevent suppressed sentiments from emerging, intensified, in harmful and unanticipated forms. To avoid these dangers, the law should prevent the embrace of unequivocal views of disability as valued, devalued, or neutral, and seek to expose ambivalence about disability to the public. This prescription calls into question the prevailing orthodoxies of disability law.
Authors:
John F Muller
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  American journal of law & medicine     Volume:  37     ISSN:  0098-8588     ISO Abbreviation:  Am J Law Med     Publication Date:  2011  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-02-01     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7509572     Medline TA:  Am J Law Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  469-521     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Young's modulus repeatability assessment using cycling compression loading on cancellous bone.
Next Document:  Comparative effectiveness research under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: can new bot...