Document Detail

Direct Vascular Control Results in Less Physiologic Derangement Than Proximal Aortic Clamping in a Porcine Model of Noncompressible Extrathoracic Torso Hemorrhage.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22071929     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
BACKGROUND:: The optimal method of vascular control and resuscitation in patients with life-threatening, extrathoracic torso hemorrhage remains debated. Guidelines recommend emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) with aortic clamping, although transabdominal aortic clamping followed by vascular control and direct vascular control (DVC) without aortic clamping are alternatives. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of three approaches to extrathoracic torso hemorrhage in a large animal model. METHODS:: Adolescent swine (Sus Scrofa) (mean weight = 80.9 kg) were randomized into three groups all of which had class IV shock established by hemorrhage from an iliac artery injury. Group 1: EDT with thoracic aortic clamping (N = 6); group 2: transabdominal supraceliac aortic clamping (SCC; N = 6); and group 3: DVC of bleeding site without aortic clamping (N = 6). After hemorrhage, EDT or SCC was performed in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with subsequent exploration of the bleeding site and placement of a temporary vascular shunt (TVS). Group 3 (DVC) underwent direct exploration of the injury and placement of a TVS. All groups were resuscitated to predefined physiologic endpoints over 6 hours with repeated measures of central and cerebral perfusion and end-organ function at standardized time points. Postmortem tissue analysis was performed to quantify injury to critical tissue beds. RESULTS:: There was no difference in mortality among the groups and no TVS failures. Central aortic pressure, carotid flow, and partial pressure brain tissue oximetry, all demonstrated increases in EDT and SCC after application of the aortic clamp relative to DVC (p < 0.05). During resuscitation, serum lactate levels were higher in EDT compared with SCC and DVC (6.85 vs. 3.08 and 2.15, respectively; p < 0.05) and serum pH in EDT reflected greater acidosis than SCC and DVC (7.24 vs. 7.36 and 7.39, respectively; p < 0.05). EDT and SCC required more intravenous fluid than DVC (2,166 mL and 2,166 mL vs. 667 mL, respectively; p < 0.05) and more vasopressors were used in EDT and SCC compared with DVC (52.1 μg and 43.5 μg vs. 12.4 μg, respectively; p < 0.05). Brain and myocardial tissue stains demonstrated the same degree of acute ischemic changes in all groups. CONCLUSION:: Although aortic clamping increases central and cerebral perfusion, DVC results in less physiologic derangement. The optimal method of aortic control would incorporate the benefits of maintained central pressure with less associated morbidity. Clinical studies evaluating DVC are warranted.
Joseph M White; Jeremy W Cannon; Adam Stannard; Gabriel E Burkhardt; Jerry R Spencer; Ken Williams; John S Oh; Todd E Rasmussen
Related Documents :
16174049 - Impact of aging on penile hemodynamics in men responding normally to prostaglandin inje...
7991099 - Embolisation of orbital varix.
18080099 - Venous sinus thrombosis: a misdiagnosis using mr angiography.
21829729 - Mesenteric resistance arteries in type 2 diabetic db/db mice undergo outward remodeling.
4083539 - The sinus of the dorsum sellae.
15285779 - Embolization of indirect carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas using the superior ophthalmic...
18496859 - Recurrent pulmonary alveolar proteinosis secondary to agammaglobulinemia.
1920819 - Types of division of the left coronary artery and the ramus diagonalis of the human heart.
4174489 - Immunological studies in arteritis of the aorta and great vessels.
Publication Detail:
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of trauma     Volume:  71     ISSN:  1529-8809     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-11-10     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376373     Medline TA:  J Trauma     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  1278-1287     Citation Subset:  -    
From the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (J.M.W., A.S., G.E.B., J.R.S., T.E.R.), Fort Sam, Houston, Texas; Department of Surgery (J.W.C.), Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam, Houston, Texas; Clinical Research Squadron (J.M.W., A.S., G.E.B., J.R.S., K.W., T.E.R.), 59th Medical Wing, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas; Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Birmingham, Royal Centre for Defense Medicine (A.S.), United Kingdom; Department of Surgery (J.S.O.), Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany; and The Norman M. Rich Department of Surgery (J.W.C., T.E.R.), F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Therapeutic Hypothermia Cardioprotection in Murine Hemorrhagic Shock/Resuscitation Differentially Af...
Next Document:  Burn injury dampens erythroid cell production through reprioritizing bone marrow hematopoietic respo...