| Differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia using 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT. | |
| | |
| Jump to Full Text | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20717825 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the use of PET/CT with (18)F-fluorocholine in the differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) from focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH). Patients with liver lesions larger than 2 cm suspicious for HCA or FNH were prospectively included. All patients underwent PET/CT with (18)F-fluorocholine and histopathological diagnosis was obtained by either liver biopsy or surgery. The ratios between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of the lesion and the mean SUV of normal liver parenchyma were calculated and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. Ten patients with FNH and 11 with HCA were included. The mean SUV ratio was 1.68±0.29 (±SD) for FNH and 0.88±0.18 for HCA (p<0.001). An SUV ratio cut-off value between 1.12 and 1.22 differentiated patients with FNH from those with HCA with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. This pilot study showed that PET/CT with (18)F-fluorocholine can differentiate HCA from FNH. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Jacomina W van den Esschert; Matthanja Bieze; Ulrich H Beuers; Thomas M van Gulik; Roelof J Bennink |
Related Documents
:
|
15488555 - Pet/ct scanner instrumentation, challenges, and solutions. 17089855 - Attenuation correction of pet cardiac data with low-dose average ct in pet/ct. 16269605 - (89)zr as a pet surrogate radioisotope for scouting biodistribution of the therapeutic ... 12712425 - Short-term pharmacokinetics and brain distribution of mecamylamine as a preliminary to ... 12755535 - Detection and quantification of breast tumor necrosis with mr imaging: value of the nec... 6766005 - Left lateral decubitus sonography of gallstones in the contracted gallbladder. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Clinical Trial; Journal Article Date: 2010-08-18 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging Volume: 38 ISSN: 1619-7089 ISO Abbreviation: Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging Publication Date: 2011 Mar |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-02-08 Completed Date: 2011-05-26 Revised Date: 2011-07-26 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 101140988 Medline TA: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Country: Germany |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 436-40 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.w.vandenesschert@amc.uva.nl |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Adenoma, Liver Cell
/
diagnosis*,
metabolism,
radiography,
radionuclide imaging Adult Biological Transport Choline / analogs & derivatives*, diagnostic use, metabolism Diagnosis, Differential Female Focal Nodular Hyperplasia / diagnosis*, metabolism, radiography, radionuclide imaging Humans Liver Neoplasms / diagnosis*, metabolism, radiography, radionuclide imaging Middle Aged Pilot Projects Positron-Emission Tomography* Tomography, X-Ray Computed* Young Adult |
| Chemical | |
Reg. No./Substance:
|
0/fluorocholine; 62-49-7/Choline |
| Comments/Corrections | |
| Full Text | |
|
Journal Information Journal ID (nlm-ta): Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 ISSN: 1619-7089 Publisher: Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg |
Article Information Download PDF ![]() © The Author(s) 2010 Received Day: 7 Month: 6 Year: 2010 Accepted Day: 26 Month: 7 Year: 2010 Electronic publication date: Day: 18 Month: 8 Year: 2010 pmc-release publication date: Day: 18 Month: 8 Year: 2010 Print publication date: Month: 3 Year: 2011 Volume: 38 Issue: 3 First Page: 436 Last Page: 440 ID: 3034878 PubMed Id: 20717825 Publisher Id: 1584 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1584-0 |
| Differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia using 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT | |
| Jacomina W. van den Esschert1 |
Address: j.w.vandenesschert@amc.uva.nl |
| Matthanja Bieze1 |
Address: m.bieze@amc.uva.nl |
| Ulrich H. Beuers2 |
Address: u.h.beuers@amc.uva.nl |
| Thomas M. van Gulik1 |
Address: +31-20-5665570 +31-20-6976621 t.m.vangulik@amc.uva.nl |
| Roelof J. Bennink3 |
Address: r.bennink@amc.uva.nl |
|
1Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
|
|
2Department of Hepatology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
|
|
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
|
Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) are benign hypervascular liver lesions that predominantly occur in young and middle-aged women. Differentiation of these two tumours using radiological imaging modalities may be difficult because of radiological features shared by both tumours [1]. The frequency with which the diagnosis is in question after routine radiological examination is unclear. Recently it has been reported that MRI with a hepatospecific contrast agent distinguishes HCA from FNH with a sensitivity and specificity of 96.9% and 100%, respectively. However, the diagnosis of most of these lesions was based solely on imaging results without histological confirmation [2]. Differentiation is crucial to decide on appropriate management because of the different therapeutic consequences. FNH is a strictly benign liver lesion and complications are very rare. Conservative treatment is therefore justified, in the absence of mechanical symptoms. On the other hand, HCA carries a risk of spontaneous bleeding [3] and malignant transformation, especially when the lesion is larger than 5 cm [4]. Therefore, resection of a HCA larger than 5 cm is usually advocated.
When radiological analysis remains inconclusive, a liver biopsy is required to establish the diagnosis. This is an invasive procedure with associated risks. Therefore, there is a need for accurate noninvasive diagnostic imaging techniques. In previous studies, the use of the 99Tc sulphur-colloid scan was found not to be helpful in diagnosis because many lesions showed atypical uptake of the tracer [5]. In our experience, the use of 99Tc mebrofenin is not accurate enough, probably due to inferior resolution of SPECT or biliary excretion on hepatobiliary scintigraphy masking smaller centrally located lesions. Bumsel and et al. recently suggested that PET/CT using the tracer 18F-fluoromethylcholine (18F-FCH) may be able to differentiate between FNH and HCA [6]. In this pilot study, we prospectively assessed the use of PET/CT with 18F-FCH with semiquantitative uptake measurements in patients in whom the diagnosis FNH or HCA was considered.
This pilot study was part of a prospective, single-centre trial which aimed to develop a diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspicion of FNH or HCA. The study protocol was approved by the medical ethics committee of the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam. Patients over 18 years of age with suspicion of FNH or HCA larger than 2 cm in diameter based on radiological imaging modalities were included in the study after written informed consent had been obtained. When suspected of malignancy, based on clinical history, imaging studies or elevated plasma alpha-fetoprotein or CEA levels, the patient was excluded.
An injection solution of 2,000–3,000 MBq of [18F]-fluorocholine with a radiochemical purity of 98% or more was synthesized. PET/CT was performed using a Philips Gemini TF-16 PET/CT scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with a spatial resolution near the centre of the field of view of 4.8 mm in transverse and axial directions. A CT transmission scan in the supine position was acquired from the mid-thorax to the mid-abdomen, encompassing the entire liver. The 12-channel helical CT scanning parameters were: 120 kVp, 50 mA/slice, rotation time 0.75 s, slice thickness/interval 5.0 mm. No intravenous contrast agent was used for the CT. At 15 min after intravenous injection of 150 MBq of 18F-FCH, emission scans were acquired from the mid-thorax to the mid-abdomen, encompassing the entire liver over three or four bed positions at 3 min per position. Images were reconstructed using a list-mode version of a maximum likelihood expectation maximization algorithm with a time-of-flight kernel applied in both the forward and back-projection operations. CT data were used for attenuation correction.
Images were analysed in consensus blinded for outcome on a Hermes workstation using Hybrid viewer software (Hermes Medical Solutions, Stockholm, Sweden). The standardized uptake value (SUV) was determined in the liver lesions and in surrounding nonaffected liver tissue volumes. Choline is normally continuously metabolized in the liver. The amount of choline used depends on the metabolic need, and therefore is not necessarily equal between patients. To allow for this different baseline choline consumption, we used the SUV ratio in our analysis. The SUV ratio was calculated by dividing the maximum SUV of the lesion (SUVmax tumour) by the mean SUV of the normal surrounding liver tissue (SUVmean liver).
The gold standard for the diagnosis of FNH and HCA is histopathological evaluation. A histological specimen was obtained by liver biopsy or liver surgery. If multiple lesions were present in the liver, only those with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis were scored using the PET/CT scan. The outcome of the PET/CT scan was compared with the gold standard.
Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 16.0.2.1). Continuous data were tested for normality of distribution and equality of variances using Levene’s test, and compared using an independent sample t-test, and are expressed as means ±SD. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and were evaluated at the 5% level of significance. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed.
Included in the study were 21 patients in the period between May 2009 and January 2010. All patients were female and their mean age was 39 years (range 22–52 years). Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Ten patients had histologically proven FNH and 11 had HCA. There were no complications after the liver biopsies. The mean SUV ratios were 1.68±0.29 (range 1.22–2.21) for FNH and 0.88±0.18 (range 0.57–1.12) for HCA (p<0.001). All FNH therefore showed increased uptake and most HCAs showed similar or decreased uptake of the choline tracer in comparison to the surrounding liver tissue (Fig. 1). ROC curve analysis suggested that a SUV ratio cut-off value between 1.12 and 1.22 differentiated patients with FNH from those with HCA with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The SUV ratios for each group are shown in Fig. 2.
This study shows that PET/CT with 18F-FCH can differentiate FNH from HCA. All HCAs showed an SUV ratio ≤1.12 and all FNH showed an SUV ratio ≥1.22. The 100% sensitivity and specificity based on visual interpretation are in accordance with the findings of Bumsel et al. [6]. They found an intense and early uptake of FCH by all FNH and no uptake by adenoma or telangiectatic FNH. The latter lesion has, however, recently been reclassified as HCA [7]. The results of both studies are promising, but must be considered carefully because of the small sample size. In our ongoing study we will further assess the accuracy of PET/CT with 18F-FCH in more patients.
The question arises as to the phenomenon that underlies the difference in choline uptake. Choline is used in the synthesis of phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin, two phospholipids that are structural components of all human cell membranes. Malignant tumour cells are known to show rapid cell duplication and therefore have a higher uptake of choline as a substrate for the cell membranes. However, HCA and especially FNH are slowly proliferating liver tumours making this duplication theory unlikely. Another theory is a difference in perfusion, since choline uptake is flow-dependent [8]. On hepatobiliary scintigraphy, FNH shows increased flow, in contrast to HCA. On contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, both FNH and HCA show rapid filling of the lesion, but an HCA also shows rapid wash-out of the contrast material [9]. Finally, there could be a difference in the metabolism of very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) in the tumours. The membrane of VLDL particles mainly consists of phospholipids. Although less plausible, it could be that FNH has an increased synthesis of VLDL particles.
A drawback of the use of PET/CT using noncontrast-enhanced low-dose CT is that the tumours might be difficult to localize. In such cases image fusion with a contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scan is needed to locate the lesions.
Based on the findings of this study, we can conclude that PET/CT with 18F-fluorocholine is able to differentiate HCA from FNH with high sensitivity and specificity. Study of a larger patient series is, however, needed to confirm these results.
The authors wish to acknowledge the support of Dr. A.D. Windhorst and the Radionuclide Center at the Free University of Amsterdam for synthesis of FCH.
Financial support None.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
References
| 1.. | Esschert JW,Gulik TM,Phoa SS. Imaging modalities for focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenomaDig SurgYear: 201027465510.1159/00026840720357451 |
| 2.. | Grazioli L,Morana G,Kirchin MA,Schneider G. Accurate differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatic adenoma at gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging: prospective studyRadiologyYear: 200523616617710.1148/radiol.236104033815955857 |
| 3.. | Shortell CK,Schwartz SI. Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasiaSurg Gynecol ObstetYear: 19911734264311658955 |
| 4.. | Foster JH,Berman MM. The malignant transformation of liver cell adenomasArch SurgYear: 19941297127177517661 |
| 5.. | Herman P,Pugliese V,Machado MA,Montagnini AL,Salem MZ,Bacchella T,et al. Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: differential diagnosis and treatmentWorld J SurgYear: 20002437237610.1007/s00268991005910658075 |
| 6.. | Bumsel F, Huchet V, Arrive L, Wendum D, Paye F, Poupon R, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET/CT) using fluro-choline allows to differentiate between adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia (abstract 437). Hepatology 2007;46(Suppl. 1):433A. |
| 7.. | Bioulac-Sage P,Rebouissou S,Thomas C,Blanc JF,Saric J,Sa CA,et al. Hepatocellular adenoma subtype classification using molecular markers and immunohistochemistryHepatologyYear: 20074674074810.1002/hep.2174317663417 |
| 8.. | Sutinen E,Nurmi M,Roivainen A,Varpula M,Tolvanen T,Lehikoinen P,et al. Kinetics of [(11)C]choline uptake in prostate cancer: a PET studyEur J Nucl Med Mol ImagingYear: 20043131732410.1007/s00259-003-1377-914628097 |
| 9.. | Trillaud H,Bruel JM,Valette PJ,Vilgrain V,Schmutz G,Oyen R,et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with SonoVue-enhanced sonography: international multicenter-study in comparison to CT and MRIWorld J GastroenterolYear: 2009153748375610.3748/wjg.15.374819673015 |
| PET | Positron emission tomography |
| CT | Computed tomography |
| FNH | Focal nodular hyperplasia |
| HCA | Hepatocellular adenoma |
| SUV | Standardized uptake value |
| ROC | Receiver operating characteristics |
Figures
Tables
Patient characteristics and PET/CT data
| Patient | Gender | Age (years) | Tumour location (segment) | Tumour size (cm) | SUVmean liver | SUVmax tumour | SUV ratio | Histopathological diagnosis | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 29 | 2 | 5.3×4.2 | 10.61 | 6.03 | 0.57 | HCA | Segmental resection |
| 2 | F | 45 | 7 | 5.0×6.0 | 8.77 | 5.49 | 0.63 | HCA | Segmental resection |
| 3 | F | 33 | 8 | 5.5×4.5 | 12.87 | 8.66 | 0.67 | HCA | Right hemihepatectomy |
| 4 | F | 35 | 2 | 6.0×7.5 | 8.86 | 7.57 | 0.85 | HCA | Segmental resection |
| 5 | F | 49 | 8 | 7.0×5.9 | 10.56 | 9.24 | 0.88 | HCA | Right hemihepatectomy |
| 6 | F | 40 | 3 | 2.3×1.9 | 12.47 | 11.52 | 0.92 | HCA | Observation |
| 7 | F | 41 | 7 | 2.3×1.4 | 8.45 | 7.93 | 0.94 | HCA | Observation |
| 8 | F | 51 | 8 | 8.5×6.5 | 10.95 | 10.55 | 0.96 | HCA | Right hemihepatectomy |
| 9 | F | 45 | 3 | 6.0×7.0 | 9.36 | 9.27 | 0.99 | HCA | Observation |
| 10 | F | 41 | 6 | 8.0×4.0 | 11.91 | 12.96 | 1.09 | HCA | Segmental resection |
| 11 | F | 40 | 1 | 11.4×9.3 | 11.48 | 12.90 | 1.12 | HCA | Enucleation of the tumour |
| 12 | F | 27 | 4 | 4.2×4.5 | 16.09 | 19.62 | 1.22 | FNH | Observation |
| 13 | F | 38 | 1 | 5.7×6.8 | 7.21 | 10.16 | 1.41 | FNH | Enucleation of the tumour |
| 14 | F | 38 | 4 | 2.4×2.2 | 7.08 | 10.29 | 1.45 | FNH | Enucleation of the tumour |
| 15 | F | 22 | 8 | 6.2×5.0 | 6.70 | 10.51 | 1.57 | FNH | Right hemihepatectomy |
| 16 | F | 41 | 5 | 7.8×7.2 | 10.68 | 17.25 | 1.62 | FNH | Observation |
| 17 | F | 52 | 7 | 6.4×6.3 | 8.89 | 15.15 | 1.70 | FNH | Observation |
| 18 | F | 44 | 5 | 3.1×2.7 | 10.00 | 18.38 | 1.84 | FNH | Observation |
| 19 | F | 45 | 8 | 7.1×7.4 | 6.82 | 12.76 | 1.87 | FNH | Observation |
| 20 | F | 40 | 2 | 3.7×3.1 | 8.43 | 16.29 | 1.93 | FNH | Enucleation of the tumour |
| 21 | F | 36 | 7/8 | 10.5×6.3 | 9.24 | 20.39 | 2.21 | FNH | Observation |
Article Categories:
Keywords: Keywords Hepatology, Benign liver neoplasms, Liver cell adenoma, Nuclear medicine. |
|
Previous Document: Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association ...
Next Document: Diagnostic and prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in follicular lymphoma.
