Document Detail

Differences in craniofacial and dental characteristics of adolescent Mexican Americans and European Americans.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22133949     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the soft-tissue profiles of matched Class I adolescent European Americans and Mexican Americans. The secondary aim was to explain profile differences based on group differences in soft-tissue thickness, skeletal morphology, dental position, and tooth size.
METHODS: The study pertained to 207 untreated Class I adolescents, including 93 Mexican Americans and 114 European Americans. Lateral cephalometric and model analyses were performed to quantify morphologic differences. Two-way analyses of variance were used to evaluate ethnicity, sex, and their interaction.
RESULTS: Mexican Americans had significantly (P <0.05) greater lip protrusion and facial convexity than did European Americans. Mexican Americans had smaller craniofacial dimensions and larger teeth, resulting in maxillary and mandibular dentoalveolar protrusion. Mexican Americans also had thicker soft tissues and greater maxillary skeletal prognathism than European Americans. The combination of thicker soft tissues, maxillary skeletal prognathism, and dentoalveolar protrusion explained the protrusive lips of Mexican Americans. The greater facial convexity of Mexican Americans was due primarily to maxillary prognathism and mandibular hyperdivergence. Sex differences pertained primarily to size; the linear dimensions of the boys were consistently and significantly larger than those of the girls.
CONCLUSIONS: European American normative data and treatment objectives do not apply to Mexican Americans. Knowledge of the soft-tissue, skeletal morphology, and dental position differences should be applied when planning treatment for Mexican American patients.
Eric Vela; Reginald W Taylor; Phillip M Campbell; Peter H Buschang
Related Documents :
24618519 - Commentary: reflections on remorse.
24283319 - Political puzzle.
23760729 - The harms of prostitution: critiquing moen's argument of no-harm.
24182389 - The ethics of neuroenhancement.
23409219 - Rcn4gsc meeting report: initiating a testbed for managing data at the interface of biod...
25032939 - Why physicians should not be involved in hostile interrogations.
22050059 - Highlights of the 2011 scientific sessions of the congress of the heart failure associa...
24147669 - Outsourcing is compromising quality, says peter carter.
21769599 - Abortion: at the still point of the turning conscientious objection debate.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics     Volume:  140     ISSN:  1097-6752     ISO Abbreviation:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop     Publication Date:  2011 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-12-02     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8610224     Medline TA:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  839-47     Citation Subset:  D; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Private practice, Corpus Christi, Tex.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Transverse maxillary arch form and mandibular asymmetry in patients with posterior unilateral crossb...
Next Document:  Dental age assessment in patients with maxillary canine displacement.