Document Detail


The Difference Is in the Start: Impact of Timing and Start Procedure on Sprint Running Performance.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22233797     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Haugen, TA, Tønnessen, E, and Seiler, SK. The difference is in the start: impact of timing and start procedure on sprint running performance. J Strength Cond Res 25(X): 000-000, 2012-The difference is in the start: impact of timing and start procedure on sprint running performance. The purpose of this study was to compare different sprint start positions and to generate correction factors between popular timing triggering methods on 40-m/40-yd sprint time. Fourteen female athletes (17 ± 1 years), personal best 100 m: 13.26 (±0.68) seconds and 11 male athletes (20 ± 5 years), personal best 100 m: 11.58 (±0.74) seconds participated. They performed 2 series of 3 40-m sprints in randomized order: (a) start from the block, measured by means of Brower audio sensor (BAS) and Dartfish video timing (DVT), (b) 3-point start, measured by using hand release pod (HR) and DVT, and (c) standing start, triggered by both photocell across starting line (SFC), and foot release (FR) plus DVT. Video analysis was performed by 2 independent observers and averaged. Simultaneous measurements at national athletics competitions demonstrated that DVT and BAS were equivalent to Omega Timing within the limits of precision of video timing (±0.01 seconds). Hand and floor timer triggering showed small but significant biases compared with movement captured from video (0.02-0.04 seconds), presumably because of sensitivity of pressure thresholds. Coefficient of variation for test-retest timing using different starting positions ranged from 0.7 to 1.0%. Compared with block starts reacting to gunfire, HR, SFC, and FR starts yielded 0.17 ± 0.09, 0.27 ± 0.12, and 0.69 ± 0.11 second faster times, respectively, over 40 m (all p < 0.001) because of inclusion or exclusion of reaction time, plus momentum, and body position differences at trigger moment. Correction factors for the conversion of 40 m/40 yd and 40 yd/40 m were 0.92 and 1.08, respectively. The correction factors obtained from this study may facilitate more meaningful comparisons of published sprint performances.
Authors:
Thomas A Haugen; Espen Tønnessen; Stephen K Seiler
Related Documents :
4533697 - A comparison of termination of pregnancies in the 2nd trimester induced by intraamnioti...
2635397 - Induction of labour using a concentrated oxytocin infusion administered in geometric pr...
15333607 - Cervical priming prior to operative hysteroscopy: a randomized comparison of laminaria ...
11408867 - Cervical cerclage in the second trimester of pregnancy: a historical cohort study.
19838387 - The indus knee prosthesis - prospective multicentric trial of a posteriorly stabilized ...
17407137 - Intracystic bleomycin therapy for craniopharyngioma in children: the canadian experience.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-1-07
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1533-4287     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-1-11     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9415084     Medline TA:  J Strength Cond Res     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
1Norwegian Olympic Federation, Oslo, Norway; and 2Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Effects of Exercise Intensity on Rating of Perceived Exertion During a Multiple-Set Resistance Exerc...
Next Document:  Pneumonectomy: calculable or non-tolerable risk factor in trimodal therapy for Stage III non-small-c...