Document Detail

Difference in Kinematics and Kinetics Between High- and Low-Velocity Resistance Loading Equated by Volume: Implications for Hypertrophy Training.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22158146     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Mohamad, NI, Cronin, JB, and Nosaka, KK. Difference in kinematics and kinetics between high- and low-velocity resistance loading equated by volume: implications for hypertrophy training. J Strength Cond Res 26(1): 269-275, 2011-Although it is generally accepted that a high load is necessary for muscle hypertrophy, it is possible that a low load with a high velocity results in greater kinematics and kinetics than does a high load with a slow velocity. The purpose of this study was to determine if 2 training loads (35 and 70% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]) equated by volume, differed in terms of their session kinematic and kinetic characteristics. Twelve subjects were recruited in this acute randomized within-subject crossover design study. Two bouts of a half-squat exercise were performed 1 week apart, one with high load-low velocity (HLLV = 3 sets of 12 reps at 70% 1RM) and the other with low-load high-velocity (LLHV = 6 sets of 12 reps at 35% 1RM). Time under tension (TUT), average force, peak force (PF), average power (AP), peak power (PP), work (TW), and total impulse (TI) were calculated and compared between loads for the eccentric and concentric phases. For average eccentric and concentric single repetition values, significantly (p < 0.05) greater (∼15-22%) PP outputs were associated with the LLHV loading, whereas significantly greater (∼7-61%) values were associated with the HLLV condition for most other variables of interest. However, in terms of total session kinematics and kinetics, the LLHV protocol resulted in significantly greater (∼16-61%) eccentric and concentric TUT, PF, AP, PP, and TW. The only variable that was significantly greater for the HLLV protocol than for the LLHV protocol was TI (∼20-24%). From these results, it seems that the LLHV protocol may offer an equal if not better training stimulus for muscular adaptation than the HLLV protocol, because of the greater time under tension, power, force, and work output when the total volume of the exercise is equated.
Nur Ikhwan Mohamad; John B Cronin; Ken K Nosaka
Related Documents :
2356746 - Mechanical work and efficiency in treadmill running at aerobic and anaerobic thresholds.
22046366 - Reversal of glial and neurovascular markers of unhealthy brain aging by exercise in mid...
21877246 - Anteroposterior and varus-valgus laxity of the knee increase after stair climbing in pa...
18230966 - The effect of sibutramine intake on resting and exercise physiological responses.
18666536 - Effects of single and multiple applications of mosquito insecticides on nontarget arthr...
20976086 - Walking with music is a safe and viable tool for gait training in parkinson's disease: ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-12-08
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1533-4287     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-12-13     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9415084     Medline TA:  J Strength Cond Res     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
1School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia; 2Faculty of Sports Science and Coaching, Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia; and 3Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, North Shore City, Auckland, New Zealand.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Physiological Comparisons Between Aquatic Resistance Training Protocols With and Without Equipment.
Next Document:  A pilot study to evaluate the effects of vardenafil on sexual distress in men with obesity.