Document Detail


Diagnostic maxillofacial coronal images reformatted from helically acquired thin-section axial CT data.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11000186     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the sensitivity and specificity of coronal images reformatted from helical thin-section axial CT data obtained for the evaluation of maxillofacial fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple fractures were created in nine cadaver heads by blunt trauma and were then evaluated using a late-generation helical CT scanner. Two neuroradiologists then independently evaluated the axial and reformatted coronal maxillofacial images. Subsequently, they reviewed the axial and direct coronal CT images, which were considered the criterion standard. RESULTS: A total of 87 fractures were identified. An experienced neuroradiologist failed to identify one displaced fracture and two nondisplaced fractures when evaluating the reformatted coronal and direct axial images for an overall sensitivity of 97%. A less experienced neuroradiologist failed to identify a total of five minimally displaced or nondisplaced fractures for an overall sensitivity of 94%. For each radiologist, no significant difference in the time required to interpret the direct versus the reformatted coronal images was seen. CONCLUSION: Interpretation of axial and reformatted coronal images resulted in accurate identification of displaced maxillofacial fractures in cadavers. This study suggests that the added cost and radiation exposure associated with incremental direct coronal CT may not be necessary for detection of clinically significant maxillofacial fractures and that further evaluation of this protocol in live trauma patients is warranted. However, because nondisplaced fractures were not routinely detected using reformatted coronal images, physical examination and clinical suspicion will still also remain necessary to determine the need for further imaging.
Authors:
E Rosenthal; D J Quint; M Johns; B Peterson; E Hoeffner
Related Documents :
7620406 - Liver volume assessment by conventional vs. helical ct.
17786506 - Urinary calculus: ivu vs. ct renal stone? a critically appraised topic.
20719366 - Multidetector computed tomography: role in determination of urinary stones composition ...
15692236 - The role of helical ct in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
7973756 - Bone scintigraphy and multimodality imaging in bone neoplasia: strategies for imaging i...
9523146 - Evaluation of the cytorich technique for cervical smears.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  AJR. American journal of roentgenology     Volume:  175     ISSN:  0361-803X     ISO Abbreviation:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Publication Date:  2000 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2000-10-13     Completed Date:  2000-10-13     Revised Date:  2010-03-24    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7708173     Medline TA:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1177-81     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Facial Bones / injuries*,  radiography
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted*
Male
Maxillofacial Injuries / radiography*
Multiple Trauma / radiography
Sensitivity and Specificity
Skull Fractures / radiography*
Tomography, X-Ray Computed*
Wounds, Nonpenetrating / radiography
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
M01 RR00042/RR/NCRR NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Improvement of hysterosalpingographic accuracy in the diagnosis of peritubal adhesions.
Next Document:  Emotional cognition without awareness after unilateral temporal lobectomy in humans.