Document Detail

Diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of CT coronary angiography in atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23382294     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
PURPOSE: To determine by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis the diagnostic accuracy, associated radiation dose, and technical challenges of computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to compare CT angiography with conventional coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation and to compare CT angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation with that in patients with sinus rhythm. The search yielded seven eligible studies (247 patients) in which CT angiography was compared with conventional coronary angiography. Six additional studies were found for the assessment of CT angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation (n = 158) and those with sinus rhythm (n = 416). Extracted data were analyzed for diagnostic accuracy parameters. Mean effective radiation doses in patients with atrial fibrillation were compared with those in patients with sinus rhythm by using the weighted mean difference method. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used to assess the quality of the selected studies.
RESULTS: At per-patient analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85%, 98%), 91% (95% CI: 85%, 94%), 79% (95% CI: 66%, 85%), and 97.5% (95% CI: 94%, 99%), respectively. Comparison of patients with atrial fibrillation and those with sinus rhythm showed no difference in heart rate (P = .16) or number of nondiagnostic segments (P = .10). Patients with atrial fibrillation were older than those with sinus rhythm (mean age ± standard deviation, 68 years ± 10 vs 61 years ± 12, respectively; P = .001). The effective radiation dose was significantly higher in patients with atrial fibrillation than in those with sinus rhythm, with a mean difference of 4.03 mSv (95% CI: 0.97, 7.1; P = .01).
CONCLUSION: CT angiography has high diagnostic accuracy in patients with atrial fibrillation but is associated with significantly higher effective radiation dose than that in patients with sinus rhythm. The older age of patients with atrial fibrillation, however, may make the risk of developing cancer less of a concern.
Mette Medom Vorre; Jawdat Abdulla
Related Documents :
20594234 - Association between clinical manifestations of complicated and uncomplicated peptic ulc...
5429104 - Serum gastrin in patients with peptic ulceration.
11856084 - Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-acc...
3144584 - Course of various clinical forms of oral lichen planus. a prospective follow-up study o...
2447604 - Correlation of doppler us tumor signals with neovascular morphologic features.
8286224 - Immunological evaluation of erythema nodosum in tularaemia.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Review     Date:  2013-02-04
Journal Detail:
Title:  Radiology     Volume:  267     ISSN:  1527-1315     ISO Abbreviation:  Radiology     Publication Date:  2013 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-04-23     Completed Date:  2013-06-25     Revised Date:  2014-01-06    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401260     Medline TA:  Radiology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  376-86     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Atrial Fibrillation / radiography*
Coronary Angiography / methods*
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiation Dosage*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
Comment In:
Radiology. 2013 Aug;268(2):610-1   [PMID:  23882100 ]
Radiology. 2013 Aug;268(2):611   [PMID:  24044125 ]
Radiology. 2013 Dec;269(3):947-8   [PMID:  24261504 ]
Radiology. 2013 Dec;269(3):948

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Hepatic Steatosis: Quantification by Proton Density Fat Fraction with MR Imaging versus Liver Biopsy...
Next Document:  Learning AND-OR Templates for Object Recognition and Detection.