Document Detail


Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12202709     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis to compare current noninvasive imaging methods (ultrasonography [US], computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance [MR] imaging, and (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG] positron emission tomography [PET]) in the detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE literature search and review of article bibliographies and our institutional charts of patients with colorectal cancer identified data with histopathologic correlation or at least 6 months of patient follow-up. Two authors independently abstracted data sets and excluded data without contingency tables or data published more than once. Summary-weighted estimates of sensitivity were obtained and stratified according to specificity of less than 85% or 85% and higher. A covariate analysis was used to evaluate the influence of patient- or study-related factors on sensitivity. RESULTS: Among 111 data sets, nine US (509 patients), 25 CT (1,747 patients), 11 MR imaging (401 patients), and nine PET (423 patients) data sets met the inclusion criteria. In studies with a specificity higher than 85%, the mean weighted sensitivity was 55% (95% CI: 41, 68) for US, 72% (95% CI: 63, 80) for CT, 76% (95% CI: 57, 91) for MR imaging, and 90% (95% CI: 80, 97) for FDG PET. Results of pairwise comparison between imaging modalities demonstrated a greater sensitivity of FDG PET than US (P =.001), CT (P =.017), and MR imaging (P =.055). CONCLUSION: At equivalent specificity, FDG PET is the most sensitive noninvasive imaging modality for the diagnosis of hepatic metastases from colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancers.
Authors:
Karen Kinkel; Ying Lu; Marcus Both; Robert S Warren; Ruedi F Thoeni
Related Documents :
19401059 - Pet/ct and occult primary tumors.
8575489 - Fdg pet imaging of paragangliomas of the neck: comparison with mibg spet.
9973209 - 2-[c-11]thymidine imaging of malignant brain tumors.
14624789 - Fdg pet imaging in hereditary thyroid cancer.
7830119 - Value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and thallium-201 in the detection of pancreatic...
19300059 - Lung parasite ova granuloma mimicking lung malignancy on fdg pet-ct.
17599709 - Magnetic resonance imaging of human brain macrophage infiltration.
15214409 - Coupling nmr to nom.
7750059 - Evaluation of iliopsoas compartment disorders by computed tomography.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Meta-Analysis    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Radiology     Volume:  224     ISSN:  0033-8419     ISO Abbreviation:  Radiology     Publication Date:  2002 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-08-30     Completed Date:  2002-10-07     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401260     Medline TA:  Radiology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  748-56     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright RSNA, 2002
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Rue Micheli-du-Crest 24, Switzerland. karen.kinkel@hcuge.ch
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology
Esophageal Neoplasms / pathology
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms / pathology*
Humans
Liver Neoplasms / diagnosis*,  secondary*,  ultrasonography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Sensitivity and Specificity
Stomach Neoplasms / pathology
Tomography, Emission-Computed
Tomography, X-Ray Computed

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Elective endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: systematic review o...
Next Document:  Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different conc...