Document Detail

Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of the scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions are not well justified: A case study in systematic reviews of health care professional reminders.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22498429     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
OBJECTIVES: Lumping and splitting refer to the scope of a systematic review question, where lumped reviews are broad and split are narrow. The objective was to determine the frequency of lumping and splitting in systematic reviews of reminder interventions, assess how review authors justified their decisions about the scope of their reviews, and explore how review authors cited other systematic reviews in the field. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A descriptive approach involving a content analysis and citation bibliometric study of an overview of 31 systematic reviews of reminder interventions. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 31 reminder reviews were split, most frequently across one category (population, intervention, study design, outcome). Review authors poorly justified their decisions about the scope of their reviews and tended not to cite other similar reviews. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that for systematic reviews of reminder interventions, splitting is more common than lumping, with most reviews split by condition or targeted behavior. Review authors poorly justify the need for their review and do not cite relevant literature to put their reviews in the context of the available evidence. These factors may have contributed to a proliferation of systematic reviews of reminders and an overall disorganization of the literature.
Michelle C Weir; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Alain Mayhew; Dean Fergusson
Related Documents :
16516069 - Frontotemporal hypoperfusion detected by 99mtc hmpao spect in a patient with olfactory ...
3774369 - Baclofen pseudopsychosis: case report.
11581099 - Multiple informants: mortality associated with psychiatric disorders in the stirling co...
22337689 - Hypertrophic olivary degeneration in children: four new cases and a review of the liter...
22965219 - An incidental finding of an intraosseous metallic object within the os calcis.
24438779 - Post-mortem evidence of doxylamine in toxicological analyses.
12539029 - Intraoral benign mesenchymoma: a report of 10 cases and review of the literature.
3718639 - Uterine horn abscess complicating pregnancy.
22934869 - A survey of anaesthetists' understanding of australian mandatory reporting laws.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-4-11
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of clinical epidemiology     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1878-5921     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2012 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-4-13     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8801383     Medline TA:  J Clin Epidemiol     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Author's specialty and conflicts of interest contribute to conflicting guidelines for screening mamm...
Next Document:  Novel therapeutic strategies targeting HIV integrase.