Document Detail


DMA Clinical Pilates Directional-Bias Assessment: Reliability and Predictive Validity.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22951921     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, repeated-measures crossover design.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the interrater reliability of directional-bias assessment and to investigate its validity for predicting immediate changes in dynamic postural stability and muscle performance following directionally biased exercises.
BACKGROUND: Directional bias in dynamic postural stability deficits may be associated with outcome following intervention.
METHODS: Two researchers independently assessed 33 participants, each with a history of more than 1 unilateral lower-limb injury, for directional bias. Interrater reliability was evaluated with the kappa coefficient and a prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa coefficient. Participants were randomly allocated to perform matched-bias (MB) or unmatched-bias (UB) exercises first, in 2 crossover groups. Two outcome measures, time to stabilization and rebound hopping, were assessed before and following each exercise intervention, using a force plate. Crossover trial data were analyzed by t tests for period, interaction, and treatment effects, and repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to investigate differences between baseline, MB, and UB.
RESULTS: Interrater reliability of directional-bias assessment was substantial (κ = 0.75; prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted κ = 0.76). Following MB exercises, medial/lateral time to stabilization and time on the ground during rebound hopping were significantly shorter (P = .01 and P = .05, respectively) compared with UB exercises. Compared with baseline, pairwise change in anterior/posterior time to stabilization (P = .008) improved following MB, whereas time in the air decreased following UB (P = .036).
CONCLUSION: Directional-bias assessment demonstrates substantial reliability, and outcomes suggest validity for predicting immediate improvements following matched directionally biased exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(8):676-687. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3790.
Authors:
Evelyn Tulloch; Craig Phillips; Gisela Sole; Allan Carman; J Haxby Abbott
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2012-07-31
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy     Volume:  42     ISSN:  1938-1344     ISO Abbreviation:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-09-06     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7908150     Medline TA:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  676-87     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Shining light on nanotechnology to help repair and regeneration.
Next Document:  Temporal and spatial distribution of waterborne mercury in a gold miner's river.