Document Detail

Current perspectives in evidence-based laboratory medicine.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10824334     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
This review examines some of the current perspectives in evidence-based laboratory medicine. From evidence-based medicine, which has concentrated mainly on treatments, we have learned that systematic reviews of the literature are the major way of producing high-quality evidence. This is because systematic reviews search all the literature, apply quality standards to ensure that only the best evidence is available, and aggregate a sufficient weight of information to inform on both the direction of a result (that a treatment works) and the magnitude of the result (how good the treatment is). In laboratory medicine, we have few systematic reviews. Even those we do have give little insight into features of studies which provide the closest view of the 'truth'. It may well be that current studies of laboratory tests are just not good enough. Often, they are too limited in scope, too small, and choose inappropriate patient populations. In the future, comprehensive, prospective and large studies should examine patient demographics and clinical history, as well as laboratory findings. This will better predict those features that are most closely associated with the correct diagnosis in a particular clinical situation. Clinical decision rules combining all available data will be the best way forward.
R A Moore
Related Documents :
25039224 - Long-term changes in liana abundance and forest dynamics in undisturbed amazonian forests.
17909614 - Traceability, reference systems and result comparability.
14759024 - Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuati...
21674034 - On the accuracy of language trees.
1964004 - Utilization of purified cellulose in fiber studies.
23873494 - A model of motor performance during surface penetration: from physics to voluntary cont...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  British journal of biomedical science     Volume:  56     ISSN:  0967-4845     ISO Abbreviation:  Br. J. Biomed. Sci.     Publication Date:  1999  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2000-06-06     Completed Date:  2000-06-06     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9309208     Medline TA:  Br J Biomed Sci     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  226-33     Citation Subset:  IM    
Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, England, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Evidence-Based Medicine*
Laboratory Techniques and Procedures*
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  11 beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: a link between the dysregulation of cortisol metabolism and hy...
Next Document:  'Practice professional development plans': general practitioners' perspectives on proposed changes i...