Document Detail


Current definitions of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome do not reflect their true severity and outcome.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10501747     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Despite intensive research, there are no universally accepted clinical definitions for acute lung injury (ALI) or the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A recent joint American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS formally defined the difference between ALI and ARDS based on the degree of oxygenation impairment. However, this definition may not reflect the true prevalence, severity and prognosis of these syndromes. METHODS: During a 22-month period, 56 consecutive mechanically ventilated patients who met the American-European Consensus definition for ARDS [arterial oxygen tension/fractional inspired oxygen (PaO(2)/FIO(2) </= 200 mmHg regardless of the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, and no evidence of left heart failure] were admitted into the intensive care units (ICU) of the Hospital del Pino, Las Palmas, Spain, and prospectively studied. The diagnosis of ALI and ARDS was made by a PEEP-FIO(2) trial, 24 h after patients met the Consensus inclusion criteria. Patients were classified as having ALI(-24 h) if the PaO(2)/FIO(2) was > 150 mmHg with PEEP = 5 cmH(2)O, and ARDS(-24 h) if the PaO(2) /FIO(2) was </= 150 mmHg with PEEP >/= 5 cmH(2)O. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 43 % (24 of 56). However, 24 h after inclusion, PaO(2) response to PEEP 5 cmH(2)O allowed the separation of our patients into two different groups: 31 patients met our ALI(-24 h) criteria (PaO(2)/FIO(2) > 150 mmHg) and their mortality was 22.6 %; 25 patients met our ARDS(-24 h) criteria (PaO(2)/FIO(2) </= 150 mmHg) and their mortality was 68 % (p = 0.0016). The differences in the respiratory severity index during the first 24 h of inclusion, PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio at baseline and at 24 h, maximum plateau airway pressure, maximum level of PEEP, and number of organ system failures during the ICU stay were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Since the use of PEEP in the American-European Consensus criteria for ARDS is not mandatory, that definition does not reflect the true severity of lung damage and outcome. Our data support the need for guidelines based on a specific method of evaluating oxygenation status before the American-European Consensus definition is adopted.
Authors:
J Villar; L Pérez-Méndez; R M Kacmarek
Related Documents :
2910677 - Relationship of biliary pressure to cholangiovenous reflux during endoscopic retrograde...
7007 - Effect of ascaris extract applied intravenously, on segment bronchus and the influence ...
14609507 - Responses of bronchial c-fiber afferents of the rabbit to changes in lung compliance.
17573487 - Comparison of the spo2/fio2 ratio and the pao2/fio2 ratio in patients with acute lung i...
24871627 - Telmisartan exerts sustained blood pressure control and reduces blood pressure variabil...
6701397 - Circulating dopamine levels and a protective action of naloxone in canine splanchnic ar...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Intensive care medicine     Volume:  25     ISSN:  0342-4642     ISO Abbreviation:  Intensive Care Med     Publication Date:  1999 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-12-10     Completed Date:  1999-12-10     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7704851     Medline TA:  Intensive Care Med     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  930-5     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Hospital de la Candelaria, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. jvillar@cistia.es
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Respiration, Artificial
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult / diagnosis*,  mortality,  physiopathology,  therapy
Respiratory Function Tests / statistics & numerical data
Severity of Illness Index*
Spain / epidemiology
Terminology as Topic*
Treatment Outcome
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Jul;26(7):1019   [PMID:  10990128 ]
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Sep;25(9):884-6   [PMID:  10501737 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Prevalence, etiologies and outcome of the acute respiratory distress syndrome among hypoxemic ventil...
Next Document:  Improved prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome 15 years on.