Document Detail


Current concepts of ventricular defibrillation.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9607464     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The aim of this article is to review the current concepts of ventricular defibrillation. We studied the interaction between strong electrical stimulus and cardiac responses in both animal models and in humans. We found that a premature stimulus (S2) of appropriate strength results in figure-eight reentry in vitro by inducing propagated graded responses. The same stimulation protocol induces figure-eight reentry and ventricular fibrillation (VF) in vivo. When the S2 strength and the magnitude of graded responses increase beyond a critical level, the increase in refractoriness at the site of the stimulus becomes so long that the unidirectional block becomes bidirectional block, preventing the formation of reentry (upper limit of vulnerability [ULV]). In other studies, we found that the effects of an electrical stimulation on reentry is in part determined by the timing of the stimulus. A protective zone is present after the induction of VF and after an unsuccessful defibrillation shock during which an electrical stimulus can terminate reentry and protect the heart from VF. These results indicate that the effects of a defibrillation shock is dependent on both the strength and the timing of the shock. Timing is not important in areas where the shock field strength is > or = ULV because the shock terminates all reentry but cannot reinitiate new ones. However, in areas where shock field strength is < ULV, the effects of the shock are determined by the timing of the shock relative to local VF activations. This ULV hypothesis of defibrillation explains the probabilistic nature of ventricular defibrillation. It also indicates that, to achieve a high probability of successful defibrillation, a shock must result in a shock field strength of > or = ULV throughout the ventricles.
Authors:
P S Chen; C D Swerdlow; C Hwang; H S Karagueuzian
Related Documents :
9607464 - Current concepts of ventricular defibrillation.
20178564 - Cardiogenic shock in a patient with hypothyroid myopathy responsive only to thyroxin re...
11084104 - Transvenous biventricular defibrillation.
2804784 - Clinical experience with percutaneous intra-aortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock...
12433514 - C-reactive protein, arterial endothelial activation, and development of transplant coro...
3754854 - Description of a novel microcomputer program to analyze left ventricular segmental wall...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology     Volume:  9     ISSN:  1045-3873     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.     Publication Date:  1998 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-01-12     Completed Date:  1999-01-12     Revised Date:  2007-11-14    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9010756     Medline TA:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  553-62     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA. CHENP@CSMC.EDU
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Animals
Body Surface Potential Mapping
Computer Simulation
Electric Countershock*
Electric Stimulation
Electrophysiology
Humans
Probability
Ventricular Fibrillation / physiopathology*
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
HL 50259/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS; P50-HL52319/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Progressive depolarization: a unified hypothesis for defibrillation and fibrillation induction by sh...
Next Document:  Eighteen years' experience with neonatal Hirschsprung's disease treated by endorectal pull-through w...