Document Detail


Cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis with preserved lung volumes.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9487350     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis (CFA) is an uncommon disorder of unknown aetiology characterised by interstitial fibrosis which typically shows a restrictive pattern on pulmonary function testing. Some patients with CFA and relative preservation of lung volumes have been described and it has been suggested that their volume preservation may be due to concomitant emphysema. In a retrospective study the relative frequency of preserved lung volumes in CFA, its relationship to emphysema determined by CT scanning, its clinical features, and its subsequent natural history were investigated. METHODS: Using predefined characteristics 48 patients with CFA were identified from pulmonary function records over a three year period. Volume preservation was defined as a forced vital capacity (FVC) of > 80% predicted at presentation. Patients with relative volume preservation were compared with those with more typical pulmonary restriction and clinical data at presentation, and details of their subsequent prognosis, treatment and loss of lung function with time were obtained. Where available, computed tomographic (CT) scans for the two groups were compared in a blinded fashion to score the extent of fibrosis and the presence of concomitant emphysema. RESULTS: Twenty one (44%) of the patients with CFA had a FVC of > 80% predicted. They were more likely to be male (76% versus 48%) and to be current smokers (57% versus 22%) with a heavier life time cigarette consumption than the restricted patients (mean (SE) 38 (4.6) versus 25 (4.5) pack years). There were no significant differences in prognosis and subsequent treatment between the groups. Comparable HRCT scans were available in 23 subjects (seven preserved, 16 restricted). They showed no difference in extent of the pulmonary fibrosis but patients with volume preservation were more likely to show concomitant emphysema (86% versus 19%). Patients with emphysema on HRCT scans were heavier smokers (41(10) versus 21(17) pack years) than those without emphysema but there was no difference in the extent of CFA score between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this area of high smoking prevalence a significant number of patients with CFA presented with relative preservation of lung volumes and FEV1/FVC ratio. In many of these subjects this appears to reflect coincidental emphysema. This may make interpretation of gas transfer factor used to monitor progression in CFA difficult. However, there was no evidence that lung volumes at presentation were of prognostic significance.
Authors:
M J Doherty; M G Pearson; E A O'Grady; V Pellegrini; P M Calverley
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Thorax     Volume:  52     ISSN:  0040-6376     ISO Abbreviation:  Thorax     Publication Date:  1997 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-03-06     Completed Date:  1998-03-06     Revised Date:  2009-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0417353     Medline TA:  Thorax     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  998-1002     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Aintree Chest Centre, Fazakerley Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Age of Onset
Female
Humans
Lung / pathology*,  physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Pulmonary Emphysema / pathology*,  physiopathology
Pulmonary Fibrosis / pathology*,  physiopathology
Respiratory Function Tests
Sex Factors
Smoking
Statistics, Nonparametric
Survival Rate
Vital Capacity
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Thorax. 1998 Sep;53(9):813   [PMID:  10319070 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Tuberculosis in National Health Service hospital staff in the west Midlands region of England, 1992-...
Next Document:  Passive smoking and sudden infant death syndrome: review of the epidemiological evidence.