Document Detail


Costs and clinical outcomes after coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease: comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18796668     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To assess costs and clinical outcomes in individuals without known coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent multidetector computed tomographic (CT) angiography compared with those in matched patients who underwent myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were captured from a deidentified, HIPAA-compliant data warehouse. We examined 1-year CAD costs (additional diagnostic coronary testing, CAD hospitalization, and coronary procedural and revascularization costs) and clinical outcomes in individuals without known CAD who underwent multidetector CT (n = 1647) compared with those in a matched cohort of patients who underwent myocardial perfusion SPECT (n = 6588). Cox proportional hazards models were employed for clinical outcome measures, including CAD hospitalization, myocardial infarction, and angina. RESULTS: Adjusted CAD costs in the multidetector CT group were 25.9% lower than in the myocardial perfusion SPECT group, by an average of $1075 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $243, $2570) per patient. Those in the multidetector CT group were more likely to undergo downstream testing with myocardial perfusion SPECT (odds ratio, 6.65; 95% CI: 5.05, 8.75; P < .001), while those in the myocardial perfusion SPECT group were more likely to undergo downstream testing with invasive angiography (odds ratio, 6.25; 95% CI: 4.35, 9.09; P < .001). The multidetector CT group was less likely to undergo coronary revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.77; P < .001) than the myocardial perfusion SPECT group. There was no significant difference between multidetector CT and myocardial perfusion SPECT groups for rates of myocardial infarction (0.4% for both) or CAD hospitalization (0.7% vs 1.1%, respectively), while rates of angina were significantly lower in the multidetector CT group (4.3% vs 6.4%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Individuals without known CAD who underwent multidetector CT as an initial diagnostic test, compared with those who underwent myocardial perfusion SPECT, incurred lower health care costs with similar rates of myocardial infarction and CAD-related hospitalization.
Authors:
James K Min; Ning Kang; Leslee J Shaw; Richard B Devereux; Matthew Robinson; Fay Lin; Antonio P Legorreta; Amanda Gilmore
Related Documents :
14736438 - Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically ef...
20206068 - Generator-produced rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imagin...
16133398 - Beneficial effects of atorvastatin on myocardial regions with initially low vasodilator...
19050598 - Stress-induced st-segment deviation in relation to the presence and severity of coronar...
22666618 - Non-pharmacological therapy for atrial fibrillation: managing the left atrial appendage.
329008 - Correction of the univentricular heart having two atrioventricular valves.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Radiology     Volume:  249     ISSN:  1527-1315     ISO Abbreviation:  Radiology     Publication Date:  2008 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-09-17     Completed Date:  2008-10-15     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401260     Medline TA:  Radiology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  62-70     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
(c) RSNA, 2008.
Affiliation:
Greenberg Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 520 E 70th St, K415, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Coronary Angiography / economics*,  methods*
Coronary Disease / economics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Humans
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon / economics*
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / economics*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Direct MR galactography: feasibility study.
Next Document:  Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose.