Document Detail

Costs of achieving high patient compliance after recall from screening mammography.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17377019     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to document the hidden costs in achieving high recall patient compliance from an off-site screening mammography program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by our institutional review board. At our institution, no patient was placed in final BI-RADS assessment category 3, 4, or 5 without a diagnostic study. Each incomplete study, in addition to the formal report, was flagged on the day sheet, letters were sent to the referring physician and patient, and an incomplete computer code was added. Working from the day sheets, a clerk contacted the patient by telephone within 2 working days to schedule the diagnostic study. Diagnostic slots were purposely left open to accommodate these cases. An ongoing computer tickler file of incomplete codes provided a further check. A time study of clerical performance with recalled patients was measured prospectively for 100 consecutive cases. RESULTS: For the years 2002-2004, 4,025 (13%) of 30,286 screening patients were recalled for diagnostic mammography. After an average of 2.2 telephone calls per patient, (3.64 minutes of clerical time), 3,977 of 4,005 patients returned for a diagnostic study. Forty-eight of 4,025 initially noncompliant patients received an average of six telephone calls (4.7 minutes) and a registered letter. One of the 28 initially noncompliant patients went on to biopsy that revealed a breast cancer. Patient compliance was 4,005 (99.5%) of 4,025. The additional cost for this program was $4,724 divided by 30,286 screening patients, or 16 cents per screening patient. CONCLUSION: The radiology department assumed responsibility for contacting patients who needed recall for additional diagnostic imaging. Using strict documentation of the incomplete breast imaging evaluations, computer checks, clerical support, and prompt scheduling, we achieved 99.5% compliance. The additional cost was small, 16 cents per screening patient.
Caroline E Blane; Renee W Pinsky; Annette I Joe; April E Pichan; Mirela R Blajan; Mark A Helvie
Related Documents :
17979929 - Assessment of comparative treatment satisfaction with sildenafil citrate and penile inj...
17283939 - Registration-associated patient misidentification in an academic medical center: causes...
10050209 - Factors involved in the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma in malaysia.
16910949 - Breaking the ceremonial order: patients' and doctors' accounts of removal from a genera...
8362899 - Reducing financial barriers enhances the return rate of stool hemoccult packets.
11893959 - Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with patients.
12920629 - Longitudinal analysis of intermediate outcomes in adolescent hemodialysis patients.
21172929 - Retinal vascular calibre is altered in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a biomarker ...
2944009 - Fibromuscular hyperplasia: extension of the disease and therapeutic outcome. results of...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  AJR. American journal of roentgenology     Volume:  188     ISSN:  1546-3141     ISO Abbreviation:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Publication Date:  2007 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-03-22     Completed Date:  2007-04-04     Revised Date:  2008-02-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7708173     Medline TA:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  894-6     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mammography / economics*
Mass Screening / economics*
Patient Compliance / statistics & numerical data*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Medical illustration techniques for PowerPoint: part 2, Practical applications.
Next Document:  Choosing a specialty in medicine: female medical students and radiology.