Document Detail


Cost-effectiveness analysis of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for acute coronary syndromes. A Canadian hospital perspective.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10662478     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost effectiveness of enoxaparin therapy versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy for patients with unstable coronary artery disease from the perspective of a Canadian hospital. DESIGN: A predictive decision analysis model using published clinical and economic evaluations and costs of medical care in Canada. PATIENTS: A hypothetical cohort of patients presenting to hospital with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction as defined by the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) trial. INTERVENTIONS: Two antithrombotic treatment strategies were compared: (i) enoxaparin 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours, and (ii) UFH intravenous bolus and constant infusion adjusted to maintain a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time. Both treatment strategies included 100 to 325 mg of oral aspirin daily. Enoxaparin or UFH was continued for a minimum of 48 hours to a maximum of 8 days. Cumulative outcomes were considered up to 30 days after initial presentation to hospital. RESULTS: At 30 days, 19.8% of patients who received enoxaparin compared with 23.3% of patients who received UFH reached one of the primary composite events. There was no difference in major bleeding between the 2 treatment groups (6.5% enoxaparin vs 6.8% UFH). The average total direct medical cost per patient was $Can848 with the enoxaparin strategy versus $Can892 with the UFH strategy (1999 values). Therapy with enoxaparin was, therefore, considered to be the dominant strategy. Univariate sensitivity analysis indicated that the decision model was not robust to changes in the 30-day composite end-point, probability of recurrent angina, or base costs for treatment of recurrent angina or enoxaparin therapy. CONCLUSION: Enoxaparin is the dominant antithrombotic pharmacotherapeutic strategy for patients with unstable coronary artery disease.
Authors:
R M Balen; C A Marra; P J Zed; M Cohen; L Frighetto
Related Documents :
17044808 - The safety and efficacy of aspirin and clopidogrel as a combination treatment in patien...
12652148 - An automated strategy for bedside aptt determination and unfractionated heparin infusio...
17160548 - Prehospital fibrinolysis with dual antiplatelet therapy in st-elevation acute myocardia...
1667048 - Safety of high doses of low molecular weight heparin (fragmin) in acute myocardial infa...
2980948 - Hemodynamic variables and the incidence of prebypass ischemia during sufentanil/o2/panc...
15033608 - Effective regurgitant orifice area of rheumatic mitral insufficiency: response to angio...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  PharmacoEconomics     Volume:  16     ISSN:  1170-7690     ISO Abbreviation:  Pharmacoeconomics     Publication Date:  1999 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2000-01-24     Completed Date:  2000-01-24     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9212404     Medline TA:  Pharmacoeconomics     Country:  NEW ZEALAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  533-42     Citation Subset:  T    
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Acute Disease
Anticoagulants / economics*,  therapeutic use*
Canada
Coronary Disease / drug therapy*,  economics*,  mortality
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Support Techniques
Enoxaparin / economics*,  therapeutic use*
Heparin / economics*,  therapeutic use*
Hospitals
Humans
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Anticoagulants; 0/Enoxaparin; 9005-49-6/Heparin

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Cost effectiveness of fluticasone propionate and flunisolide in the treatment of corticosteroid-naiv...
Next Document:  Cost effectiveness of amphotericin B plus G-CSF compared with amphotericin B monotherapy. Treatment ...