Document Detail


Cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open colectomy in patients with colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population database.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22643256     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Laparoscopic colectomy (LC) is a safe and reliable option for patients with colon cancer. This study examined factors associated with LC use and cost differences between LC and open colectomy (OC). Using the Cost & Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database (2008), patients with colon cancer undergoing elective LC or OC were selected. Chi square and Mann-Whitney tests were used to assess differences between LC and OC. Logistic and multiple regression analysis was used to determine variables associated with LC and predictors of cost. All analysis was weighted. A total of 63,950 patients were identified (LC 8.1%, OC 91.9%). The majority was female (52.7%), white (61.4%), using Medicare (61.1%), and had surgery performed at a large (64.2%), nonteaching (56.9%), urban (87.3%) hospital in the South (37.7%). Mean age was 70 years. On unadjusted analysis, LC was associated with a lower mortality rate (1.7 vs 2.4%), fewer complications (18.9 vs 27.1%), shorter length of stay (5 vs 7 days), and lower total charges ($41,971 vs $43,459, all P < 0.001). LC is a less expensive but less popular surgical option for colon cancer. Stage, race, Charlson score, teaching status, location, and hospital size influence the use of a laparoscopic approach. LC is associated with fewer complications and decreased mortality which contribute to its lower cost as compared with OC.
Authors:
Sachin Vaid; James Tucker; Ted Bell; Rod Grim; Vanita Ahuja
Related Documents :
22461316 - Sonographic predictors of surgery in fetal coarctation of the aorta.
24184326 - Superficial wound closure complications with barbed sutures following knee arthroplasty.
22588426 - Intraspinal penetrating stab injury to the middle thoracic spinal cord with no neurolog...
22818566 - Live robotic surgery: are outcomes compromised?
23242516 - Insufficient joint forces of first-generation articulating instruments for laparoendosc...
24968696 - Access to cerebrospinal fluid in piglets via the cisterna magna: optimization and descr...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American surgeon     Volume:  78     ISSN:  1555-9823     ISO Abbreviation:  Am Surg     Publication Date:  2012 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-05-30     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0370522     Medline TA:  Am Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  635-41     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Staying the course.
Next Document:  Resident perceptions of the impact of paging on intraoperative education.