|Controlled synthesis of bilayer graphene on nickel.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 22863171 Owner: NLM Status: PubMed-not-MEDLINE|
|We report a uniform and low-defect synthesis of bilayer graphene on evaporated polycrystalline nickel films. We used atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition with ultra-fast substrate cooling after exposure to methane at 1,000°C. The optimized process parameters, i.e., growth time, annealing profile and flow rates of various gases, are reported. By using Raman spectroscopy mapping, the ratio of 2D to G peak intensities (I2D/IG) is in the range of 0.9 to 1.6 over 96% of the 200 μm × 200 μm area. Moreover, the average ratio of D to G peak intensities (ID/IG) is about 0.1.|
|Ahmad Umair; Hassan Raza|
|Type: Journal Article Date: 2012-08-06|
|Title: Nanoscale research letters Volume: 7 ISSN: 1556-276X ISO Abbreviation: Nanoscale Res Lett Publication Date: 2012|
|Created Date: 2012-10-24 Completed Date: 2012-10-25 Revised Date: 2013-02-19|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101279750 Medline TA: Nanoscale Res Lett Country: United States|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 437 Citation Subset: -|
|Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. email@example.com.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Nanoscale Res Lett
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Nanoscale Res Lett
Copyright ©2012 Umair and Raza; licensee Springer.
Received Day: 11 Month: 6 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 25 Month: 7 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 6 Month: 8 Year: 2012
Volume: 7 Issue: 1
First Page: 437 Last Page: 437
PubMed Id: 22863171
Publisher Id: 1556-276X-7-437
|Controlled synthesis of bilayer graphene on nickel|
|Ahmad Umair1||Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Hassan Raza1||Email: email@example.com|
1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
Graphene, a monolayer of sp2-hybridized C atoms arranged in a honeycomb structure, has attracted a lot of attention due to its excellent electrical, mechanical and optical properties [1-3]. Monolayer and bilayer graphene (BLG) are semi-metals with zero band gap. The intrinsic band gap has been the key in semiconducting devices. Band gap can be induced by patterning graphene into nano-ribbons [4-10]. Another method to introduce band gap is to apply electric field in the stacking direction of BLG [11-14].
Graphene synthesis on transition metals by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) or via segregation of solid carbon sources is generally a scalable process [15-24]. Transition metals such as Ni, Cu, Pt, Ir and Pd have been used as substrates for graphene growth [25-29]. Several hydrocarbons, like methane (CH4), acetylene, ethylene, propane, etc., have been used in atmospheric and low-pressure CVD as a carbon source . Besides the CVD of the above mentioned gases, C60 and solid polymers such as poly(methyl metha-crylate), polystyrene and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene have also been decomposed to grow graphene [30-32].
Graphene synthesizes on Ni due to segregation of carbon at high temperatures. Due to the high solubility of carbon in Ni, precipitation of extra carbon occurs at the metal surfaces during cooling. Since the precipitation is a non-equilibrium process, this makes thickness control of graphene a challenge [33,34]. The segregation of extra carbon during the cooling process can be decreased by reducing Ni film thickness. Moreover, extra carbon segregation can also be controlled by controlling the cooling rate [15,22,35-37]. Very high cooling rate has been reported to deposit amorphous carbon deposition, whereas low cooling rate leads to no growth . It has been reported that the carbon segregation on Ni is non-uniform at low temperatures. However, CH4 has high decomposition temperature, which helps in constant carbon coverage over the Ni surfaces . Furthermore, high melting point of Ni enables high-temperature annealing, which results in larger domains, thus making it favorable for large-area low-defect growth .
In this paper, we report a method to control the precipitation of extra carbon on Ni surface during the cooling-down process. We reduce the sample temperature from the growth temperature of 1,000°C to room temperature in a few seconds, which leads to a uniform BLG growth.
BLG was grown on a 300 nm Ni film, evaporated on SiO2 (300 nm)/Si substrate. SiO2/Si substrate was treated with acetone (10 min), methanol (10 min), deionized (DI) water rinse (10 min) and nanostrip (20 min; commercial Piranha substitute), followed by another DI water rinse (10 min). After cleaning, Ni was evaporated by using an e-beam evaporator at 1Å/s. Ni/SiO2/Si samples were gently cleaned in UV ozone for 2 min before loading in the CVD furnace. UV ozone eliminates organic contaminants from the Ni film, which is important for uniform growth. Process gases were supplied by Airgas (Denver, CO, USA) with research grade 5.0 (minimum purity 99.999%). The samples were loaded into the CVD furnace (1-inch tube diameter; Lindbergh/Blue, Thermo Scientific, Logan, UT, USA) at room temperature and heated to 700°C in 200 sccm Ar ambient. At 700°C, 65 sccm H2 was introduced in addition to Ar, and the samples were annealed for another 10 min. The temperature was ramped to 1,000°C in Ar/H2 ambient. To stabilize the growth temperature, the samples were further annealed for 10 min after reaching 1,000°C. Ar/H2 annealing sequence leads to increased grain size and decreased surface roughness [18,22]. Finally, H2 was turned off, and BLG was synthesized by introducing CH4 into the furnace in addition to the already flowing Ar gas. A wide process parameter space was explored, which includes (a) varying the growth time (50, 60 and 120 s) under a constant CH4 flow rate (23 sccm) and (b) varying the flow rates (6, 12 and 23 sccm) under a constant growth time (120 s). After the growth, the sample temperature was reduced to room temperature within a few seconds by pulling the quartz tube out of the hot region of the furnace.
For material characterization, micro-Raman spectroscopy (Raman Nicolet Almega XR Spectrometer, Thermo Scientific) was used in the point scan and the area scan mode [3,39,40]. A 532 nm laser (10 mW power) was used with a 0.6 μm spot size, 15 s scan time and four scans per point. To examine the uniformity of the synthesized graphene, the ratio of 2D to G peak intensities (I2D/IG ratio) was taken over an area of 200 μm × 200 μm. In the area scan, a 2.1 μm spot size was used with 15 s scan time, four scans per point and 10 μm step size.
Figure 1a,d shows the ratio of 2D to G peak intensities (I2D/IG) at two different locations for a sample that was grown under 23 sccm CH4 for 120 s. In each case, the I2D/IG ratio is in the range of 0.9 to 1.6 over 96% of the total 200 μm × 200 μm area. This suggests that the BLG is grown over a larger percentage of area on polycrystalline Ni film [21,22,39,40]. The I2D and IG plots over these locations are shown in Figure 1b,e and Figure 1c,f, respectively. These plots show a uniform intensity distribution for the G and D peaks, which further implies the graphene sample uniformity.
Next, the growth time was varied to study the effect on the number of layers, uniformity and defect density of the synthesized graphene. Figure 2a shows the Raman spectra of the samples that were treated under 23 sccm of CH4 for 50, 60 and 120 s. The I2D/IG ratio is close to unity with these varying growth times. This quenching method inhibits the precipitation of extra C on the Ni surface and thus controls the number of layers and the uniformity of the graphene for various growth times. Furthermore, after turning the CH4 off, if there is some residual C inside the furnace, the ultra-fast cooling suppresses its further segregation. Moreover, the effect of the CH4 flow rate was also studied for constant growth time. Figure 2b shows the Raman spectra of samples for which the growth time was 120 s with CH4 flow rates of 6, 12 and 23 sccm. It shows that the BLG growth is consistent for a wide range of flow rates.
Another important observation is that the intensity of the D peak decreases as the growth time increases from 50 to 120 s, as shown in Figure 2a. The ratio of D to G peak intensities (ID/IG ratio) was taken over 20 locations for the samples grown under 23 sccm of CH4 for 50, 60 and 120 s. The mean and standard deviation of ID/IG ratio are plotted in the error bar graph shown in Figure 3. The average ID/IG ratio for the sample grown under 23 sccm of CH4 for 120 s is 0.1 with a standard deviation of 0.05, which suggests a low defect density of BLG for these parameters. Moreover, Figure 3 also shows that the average defect density decreases with the increasing growth time. Figure 2b also shows that the defect density of BLG is small for the samples grown under wide CH4 flow rates for 120 s.
We find that quenching the samples from the hot region of the furnace helps in reducing the non-equilibrium precipitation of extra carbon on the Ni surfaces during the cooling process, and that the main growth mechanism is diffusion of carbon on Ni surface due to the decomposed CH4. With fast cooling, the reduced sample temperature stops further segregation of carbon due to any residual carbon inside the furnace, even after CH4 flow was turned off. The thickness of the graphene is almost constant even with a wide range of CH4 flow rates (6 to 23 sccm), which shows that the segregation process is rather self-limiting. Furthermore, the growth temperature is high due to high decomposition temperature of CH4 that supports the uniform carbon diffusion over the Ni surface. This helps in growing uniform BLG with less defect density. Moreover, as the growth time is decreased, the average intensity of the D peak increases, which indicates incomplete growth. This further verifies the self-limiting equilibrium segregation of carbon on Ni surface, with reduced out-diffused carbon atoms from the C-Ni solution due to fast cooling. To verify the proposed growth mechanism, graphene was grown on 300 nm Ni film, with 23 sccm CH4 flow rated for 120 s, cooling the samples within the furnace. Due to slow cooling, the precipitation of carbon on Ni surface from the C-Ni solution is a dominant process.
Yet, another way to reduce the precipitation of extra carbon is to reduce the thickness of Ni film as less thick films would absorb less carbon and thus contribute to further decrease in out-diffused carbon. To characterize this effect, the growth was performed on 200 and 100 nm thick Ni films, with 23 sccm CH4 flow rate for 120 s. For the 200 nm Ni film, the I2D/IG ratio is close to unity, and the area uniformity is similar to the 300 nm thick films. However, growth on 100 nm Ni film results in increased surface roughness. Although the I2D/IG ratio is still around unity in this process, surface coverage is only 50%.
In conclusion, we have reported a method to synthesize bilayer graphene through CVD of CH4 on polycrystalline Ni films with an ultra-fast cooling technique. The number of graphene layers is uniform over a wide area with low defect density. The growth is consistent over a certain variation of CH4 flow rate and growth time.
Both authors declare that they have no competing interests.
HR and AU have equal contribution to this work and the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We are grateful to A. Mohsin for the useful discussions, J. Baltrusaitis for helping with the Raman spectroscopy and T. Z. Raza for critically reviewing an early draft of this manuscript. We are also thankful to C. Coretsopoulos, D. Norton and J. Olesberg for their help in the Micro Fabrication Facility. Evaporation was carried out in the Micro Fabrication Facility, and the Raman spectroscopy was performed in the Central Microscopy Research Facility at the University of Iowa. This work is supported by the MPSFP program of the VPR office at the University of Iowa.
|Geim AK,Novoselov KS,The rise of grapheneNat MaterYear: 2007618319110.1038/nmat184917330084|
|Castro Neto AH,Peres NMR,Novoselov KS,Geim AK,The electronic properties of grapheneRev Mod PhysYear: 20098110916210.1103/RevModPhys.81.109|
|Raza H,Graphene Nanoelectronics: Metrology, Synthesis, Properties and ApplicationsYear: 2012Springer, Berlin|
|Nakada K,Fujita M,Dresselhaus G,Dresselhaus MS,Edge state in graphene ribbons: nanometer size effect and edge shape dependencePhys Rev BYear: 199654179541796110.1103/PhysRevB.54.17954|
|Fujita M,Wakabayashi K,Nakada K,Kusakabe K,Peculiar localized states at zig-zag edgesJ Phys Soc JpnYear: 1996651920192310.1143/JPSJ.65.1920|
|Wakabayashi K,Fujita M,Ajiki H,Sigrist M,Electronic and magnetic properties of nanographite ribbonsPhys Rev BYear: 1999598271828210.1103/PhysRevB.59.8271|
|Kawai T,Miyamoto Y,Sugino O,Koga Y,Graphitic ribbons without hydrogen-termination: electronic structures and stabilitiesPhys Rev BYear: 200062R16349R1635210.1103/PhysRevB.62.R16349|
|Raza H,Kan EC,Armchair graphene nanoribbons: electronic structure and electric-field modulationPhys Rev BYear: 200877245434|
|Raza H,Zigzag graphene nanoribbons: bandgap and midgap state modulationJ Phys Condens MatterYear: 20112338220310.1088/0953-8984/23/38/38220321891831|
|Raza H,Edge and passivation effects in armchair graphene nanoribbonsPhys Rev BYear: 201184165425|
|McCann E,Abergel DSL,Fal’ko VI,Electrons in bilayer grapheneSolid State CommunYear: 200714311011510.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.054|
|Castro E,Novoselov K,Morozov S,Peres N,Dos Santos J,Nilsson J,Guinea F,Geim A,Neto A,Biased bilayer graphene: semiconductor with a gap tunable by the electric field effectPhys Rev LettYear: 20079921680218233240|
|Xia F,Farmer DB,Lin Y-M,Avouris P,Graphene field-effect transistors with high on/off current ratio and large transport band gap at room temperatureNano LettYear: 20101071571810.1021/nl903963620092332|
|Raza H,Kan EC,Field modulation in bilayer graphene band structureJ Phys Condens MatterYear: 20092110220210.1088/0953-8984/21/10/10220221817415|
|Yu Q,Lian J,Siriponglert S,Li H,Chen YP,Pei S-S,Graphene segregated on Ni surfaces and transferred to insulatorsAppl Phys LettYear: 20089311310310.1063/1.2982585|
|Reina A,Jia X,Ho J,Nezich D,Son H,Bulovic V,Dresselhaus MS,Kong J,Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor depositionNano LettYear: 20099303510.1021/nl801827v19046078|
|Kim KS,Zhao Y,Jang H,Lee SY,Kim JM,Kim KS,Ahn J-H,Kim P,Choi J-Y,Hong BH,Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodesNatureYear: 200945770671010.1038/nature0771919145232|
|Li X,Cai W,An J,Kim S,Nah J,Yang D,Piner R,Velamakanni A,Jung I,Tutuc E,Banerjee SK,Colombo L,Ruoff RS,Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foilsScienceYear: 20093241312131410.1126/science.117124519423775|
|Lee Y,Bae S,Jang H,Jang S,Zhu S-E,Sim SH,Song YI,Hong BH,Ahn J-H,Wafer-scale synthesis and transfer of graphene filmsNano LettYear: 20101049049310.1021/nl903272n20044841|
|Liu W,Li H,Xu C,Khatami Y,Banerjee K,Synthesis of high-quality monolayer and bilayer graphene on copper using chemical vapor depositionCarbonYear: 2011494122413010.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.047|
|Peng Z,Yan Z,Sun Z,Tour JM,Direct growth of bilayer graphene on SiO2 substrates by carbon diffusion through nickelACS NanoYear: 201158241824710.1021/nn202923y21888426|
|Wan D,Lin T,Bi H,Huang F,Xie X,Chen I-W,Jiang M,Autonomously controlled homogenous growth of wafer-sized high-quality graphene via a smart Janus substrateAdv Funct MaterYear: 2012221033103910.1002/adfm.201102560|
|Arco LGD,Zhang Y,Kumar A,Zhou C,Synthesis, transfer, and devices of single- and few-layer graphene by chemical vapor depositionIEEE Trans NanotechnolYear: 20098135138|
|Chae SJ,Gunes F,Kim KK,Kim ES,Gang HH,Kim SM,Shin H-J,Yoon S-M,Choi J-Y,Park MH,Yang CW,Pribat D,Le YH,Synthesis of large-area graphene layers on poly-nickel substrate by chemical vapor deposition: wrinkle formationAdv MaterYear: 2009212328233310.1002/adma.200803016|
|Rümmeli MH,Rocha CG,Ortmann F,Ibrahim I,Sevincli H,Börrnert F,Kunstmann J,Bachmatiuk A,Pötschke M,Shiraishi M,Meyyappan M,Büchner V,Roche S,Cuniberti G,Graphene: piecing it togetherAdv MaterYear: 2011234471449010.1002/adma.20110185522103000|
|Park HJ,Meyer J,Roth S,Skákalová V,Growth and properties of few-layer graphene prepared by chemical vapor depositionCarbonYear: 2010481088109410.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.030|
|Pollard AJ,Nair RR,Sabki SN,Staddon CR,Perdigao LMA,Hsu CH,Garfitt JM,Gangopadhyay S,Gleeson HF,Geim AK,Beton PH,Formation of monolayer graphene by annealing sacrificial nickel thin filmsJ PhysChemLettYear: 20091131656516567|
|Nandamuri G,Roumimov S,Solanki R,Chemical vapor deposition of graphene filmsNanotechnologyYear: 20102114560410.1088/0957-4484/21/14/14560420215663|
|Chen Z,Ren W,Liu B,Gao L,Pei S,Wu Z-S,Zhao J,Cheng H-M,Bulk growth of mono- to few-layer graphene on nickel particles by chemical vapor deposition from methaneCarbonYear: 2010483543355010.1016/j.carbon.2010.05.052|
|Sun Z,Yan Z,Yao J,Beitler E,Zhu Y,Tour JM,Growth of graphene from solid carbon sourcesNatureYear: 201046854955210.1038/nature0957921068724|
|Shin H-J,Choi WM,Yoon S-M,Han GH,Woo YS,Kim ES,Chae SJ,Li X-S,Benayad A,Loc DD,Gunes F,Lee YH,Choi J-Y,Transfer-free growth of few-layer graphene by self-assembled monolayersAdv MaterYear: 2011234392439710.1002/adma.20110252621882264|
|Sabki SN,Garfitt JM,Capiod P,Beton PH,Graphene formation by decomposition of C60J Phys ChemYear: 20111157472747610.1021/jp200628b|
|Pang S,Hernandez Y,Feng X,Müllen K,Graphene as transparent electrode material for organic electronicsAdv MaterYear: 2011232779279510.1002/adma.20110030421520463|
|Li X,Cai W,Colombo L,Ruoff RS,Evolution of graphene growth on Ni and Cu by carbon isotope labelingNano LettYear: 200994268427210.1021/nl902515k19711970|
|Miyata Y,Kamon K,Ohashi K,Kitaura R,Yoshimura M,Shinohara H,A simple alcohol-chemical vapor deposition synthesis of single-layer graphenes using flash coolingAppl Phys LettYear: 20109626310510.1063/1.3458797|
|Liu W,Chung C-H,Miao C-Q,Wang Y-J,Li B-Y,Ruan L-Y,Patel K,Park Y-J,Woo J,Xie Y-H,Chemical vapor deposition of large area few layer graphene on Si catalyzed with nickel filmsThin Solid FilmsYear: 2010518S128S13210.1016/j.tsf.2009.10.070|
|Zhou Q,Lin L,Synthesis of graphene using micro chemical vapor deposition (In IEEE 23rd International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems).Year: 2010IEEE, Wanchai. Hong Kong4346|
|Shelton JC,Patil HR,Blakely JM,Equilibrium segregation of carbon to a nickel (111) surface: a surface phase transitionSurf SciYear: 19744349352010.1016/0039-6028(74)90272-6|
|Ferrari AC,Meyer JC,Scardaci V,Casiraghi C,Lazzeri M,Mauri F,Piscanec S,Jiang D,Novoselov KS,Roth S,Geim AK,Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layersPhys Rev LettYear: 20069718740117155573|
|Malard LM,Pimenta MA,Dresselhaus G,Dresselhaus MS,Raman spectroscopy in graphenePhys RepYear: 2009473518710.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003|
Keywords: Bilayer graphene, Chemical vapor deposition, Raman spectroscopy.
Previous Document: Spatial synchrony of malaria outbreaks in a highland region of Ethiopia.
Next Document: Perinatal and early life factors associated with symptoms of depression in Brazilian children.