Document Detail


Contrast resolution in multidetector-row CT with 16 detector rows: phantom study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20821158     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This study was performed for evaluation of high- and low-contrast resolution in multidetector-row CT (MDCT) with 16 detector rows. For evaluating high-contrast resolution, a phantom was scanned ten times at 100 mA s with 24 patterns of scan parameters under several X-ray beam widths, X-ray tube voltages, X-ray tube rotation times, and helical pitches. Three radiological technologists observed the images visually. For evaluating low-contrast resolution, a phantom was scanned ten times at 100 mA s with the 24 patterns of scan parameters, which were the same as for high-contrast resolution. The images were examined based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The high-contrast resolution deteriorated in the off-center locations when helical pitches of 1.375:1 or 1.75:1 were used. High helical pitch (>0.9375:1) and low tube voltage had significant effects on the low-contrast resolution. However, a wide X-ray beam width and short X-ray tube rotation time had no definite influence. Therefore, a helical pitch of 0.5625:1 should be used when the contrast resolutions are really important, and a wide X-ray beam width and short X-ray tube rotation time can improve the temporal resolution without deterioration of contrast resolution.
Authors:
Kosuke Matsubara; Kichiro Koshida; Masayuki Suzuki; Norio Hayashi; Tadanori Takata; Hideo Tsujii; Tomoyuki Yamamoto; Osamu Matsui
Related Documents :
11804898 - Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical ct versus selective helical ct after unenhanc...
8478458 - Ultrasonography and biliary extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy.
18358308 - Usefulness of axial planes of helical computed tomography for diagnosis of pancreaticob...
3300578 - Comparison of intraoperative ultrasonography and cholangiography in detection of small ...
18309018 - Transcatheter intraarterial perfusion: mr monitoring of chemoembolization for hepatocel...
15822358 - Current status and issues of concern in diagnostic radiology.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Evaluation Studies; Journal Article     Date:  2007-11-01
Journal Detail:
Title:  Radiological physics and technology     Volume:  1     ISSN:  1865-0341     ISO Abbreviation:  Radiol Phys Technol     Publication Date:  2008 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-09-07     Completed Date:  2010-12-20     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101467995     Medline TA:  Radiol Phys Technol     Country:  Japan    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  13-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Radiological Technology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan. matsuk@rad.m.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Phantoms, Imaging*
ROC Curve
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / instrumentation*,  methods
Time Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / instrumentation*,  methods

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.
Next Document:  Development and performance evaluation of the second model 256-detector row CT.