Document Detail


Confirmation of the ability to ventilate by facemask before administration of neuromuscular blocker: a non-instrumental piece of information?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20042476     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine whether anaesthetists routinely confirm their ability to ventilate a patient's lungs by a facemask before the administration of a neuromuscular blocker and the rationale for this practice. METHODS: An online survey of trainee and non-trainee anaesthetists working in hospitals forming part of the Central London School of Anaesthesia collected 136 complete data sets over a 3 month period. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of 136 (57%) routinely checked they could ventilate by the facemask ('checkers'). The reasons given for this varied, though the most common was the ability to 'enable escape wake-up'. The practice was most commonly adopted by anaesthetists with less experience. In a hypothetical 'cannot ventilate' scenario, the use of succinylcholine was advocated by the majority of respondents, both 'checkers' and 'non-checkers'. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of firm evidence to support the practice of confirming the ability to ventilate the lungs before administering a neuromuscular blocking drug (NMB), we found strongly held views that supported the practice and equally strongly held views that opposed it. However, in a hypothetical emergency situation where ventilation by the facemask after induction of anaesthesia was impossible, the majority of respondents (including 'checkers') would administer a neuromuscular blocker. This apparent paradox can be explained by well-recognized psychological mechanisms. We suggest that in checking the ability to ventilate by the facemask, some anaesthetists are seeking information that may be relevant but not instrumental in deciding when to administer an NMB.
Authors:
R H Broomhead; R J Marks; P Ayton
Related Documents :
18563576 - Application of a four-fluid nozzle spray drier to prepare inhalable rifampicin-containi...
8947666 - Database and knowledge base integration in decision support systems.
2433966 - Human spermatozoa stained with toluidine blue-pyronine. a rapid method for differentiat...
10822536 - Total synthesis of 3-deoxy-d-manno-2-octulosonic acid (kdo) and 2-deoxy-beta-kdo.
2334346 - Good systems save costs.
9367956 - Connectivity and management of caribbean coral reefs
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2009-12-30
Journal Detail:
Title:  British journal of anaesthesia     Volume:  104     ISSN:  1471-6771     ISO Abbreviation:  Br J Anaesth     Publication Date:  2010 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-02-12     Completed Date:  2010-03-18     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372541     Medline TA:  Br J Anaesth     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  313-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Free Hospital London, Hampstead, UK. bobbroomhead@gmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Anesthesiology / education
Clinical Competence
Education, Medical, Graduate / methods
Female
Health Care Surveys
Humans
London
Male
Masks*
Medical Staff, Hospital / standards
Neuromuscular Blockade / methods,  standards*
Neuromuscular Blocking Agents / administration & dosage
Professional Practice / statistics & numerical data
Respiration, Artificial / methods,  standards*
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Neuromuscular Blocking Agents

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Effects of magnesium sulphate on intraoperative neuromuscular blocking agent requirements and postop...
Next Document:  Comparison of early cognitive function and recovery after desflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia in t...