Concurrent validity of the nonexercise based VO2max prediction equation using percentage body fat as a variable in asian Indian adults.  
Jump to Full Text  
MedLine Citation:

PMID: 22998672 Owner: NLM Status: PubMednotMEDLINE 
Abstract/OtherAbstract:

BACKGROUND: Aerobic capacity (VO2max) is highly dependent upon body composition of an individual and body composition varies with ethnicity. The purpose of this study was to check the concurrent validity of the nonexercise prediction equation developed by Jackson and colleagues (1990) using percentage body fat as a variable in Asian Indian adults. METHODS: One hundred twenty collegeaged participants (60 male, 60 female, mean age 22.02 ± 2.29 yrs) successfully completed a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a motorized treadmill to assess VO2max. VO2max was then estimated by the nonexercise prediction equation developed by Jackson and colleagues (1990) using percentage body fat. Percentage body fat was calculated by three different models (Sandhu et al's fat mass equation, Durninwomersley's 4 site percentage body fat and Jackson & Pollock's 4 site percentage body fat) and was used in the above equation. The results of VO2max obtained using "gold standard" treadmill methods were then compared with the three results of VO2max obtained by Jackson et al's equation (using three different models to calculate percentage body fat) and it was determined which equation is best suited to determine percentage body fat and in turn VO2 max for Indian population. RESULTS: Jackson et al's prediction equation overpredicts VO2max in Asian Indian subjects who have a lower VO2max (33.41 ± 14.39 ml/kg/min) than those reported in other age matched populations. percentage body fats calculated by the three equations were significantly different and the correlation coefficient (r) between VO2max calculated by Jackson and colleagues (1990) using Sandhu et al's equation for percentage body fat with VO2 max calculated using treadmill (gold standard) (r = .817) was found slightly more significantly correlated than the other two equations and was not statistically different from the measured value. CONCLUSIONS: This study proves that VO2max equation using Sandhu et al's model for percentage body fat yields more accurate results than other studied equations in healthy collegeaged participants in India. 
Authors:

Shweta Shenoy; Bhupinder S Tyagi; Jaspal S Sandhu 
Publication Detail:

Type: Journal Article Date: 20120921 
Journal Detail:

Title: Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT Volume: 4 ISSN: 17582555 ISO Abbreviation: Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol Publication Date: 2012 
Date Detail:

Created Date: 20130225 Completed Date: 20130226 Revised Date: 20130418 
Medline Journal Info:

Nlm Unique ID: 101484554 Medline TA: Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol Country: England 
Other Details:

Languages: eng Pagination: 34 Citation Subset:  
Affiliation:

Reader, Department of Sports Medicine & Physiotherapy, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India. shwet1999@yahoo.com. 
Export Citation:

APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex 
MeSH Terms  
Descriptor/Qualifier:


Comments/Corrections 
Full Text  
Journal Information Journal ID (nlmta): Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol Journal ID (isoabbrev): Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol ISSN: 17582555 Publisher: BioMed Central 
Article Information Download PDF Copyright ©2012 Shenoy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. openaccess: Received Day: 3 Month: 6 Year: 2011 Accepted Day: 3 Month: 9 Year: 2012 collection publication date: Year: 2012 Electronic publication date: Day: 21 Month: 9 Year: 2012 Volume: 4First Page: 34 Last Page: 34 PubMed Id: 22998672 ID: 3579753 Publisher Id: 17582555434 DOI: 10.1186/17582555434 
Concurrent validity of the nonexercise based VO_{2}max prediction equation using percentage body fat as a variable in asian Indian adults  
Shweta Shenoy1  Email: shwet1999@yahoo.com 
Bhupinder S Tyagi1  Email: physiobhupinder@gmail.com 
Jaspal S Sandhu1  Email: jssandhu2000@yahoo.com 
1Reader, Department of Sports Medicine & Physiotherapy, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India 
Maximal oxygen uptake or consumption (VO_{2}max) is the maximum capacity of an individual’s body to transport and use oxygen during incremental exercise which reflects the physical fitness of an individual [^{1}]. The measurement of VO_{2}max as a parameter of cardiorespiratory fitness is useful when educating individuals about their overall fitness status, considering cardiovascular risk such as physical inactivity and overweight status [^{2}]. Since this method involves the direct measurement of expired gas samples, it is considered highly reliable and accurate and is, thus considered the “gold standard” for determining VO_{2} max [^{3}]. This approach though is practically difficult, requires fairly expensive equipment and the assistance of trained personnel. Accurately measuring the VO_{2}max involves a physical effort sufficient in duration and intensity to fully tax the aerobic system, the performance of which is influenced by the individual’s motivation. This intense effort makes the procedure difficult to perform because of which, some older or higherrisk individuals should not perform the test without medical supervision [[^{4}].
As a result, researchers have generated various non exercise based tests for predicting VO_{2}max that utilize variables of physical parameters (viz. age, gender, height, weight, BMI, body fat percentage) [^{4}]. There are very few valid models available which utilize percentage body fat as a determinant of VO_{2}max.These models include those of Heil et al. (1995) [^{5}] and Jackson et al. (1990) [^{6}]. Body composition is known to vary with ethnicity [^{7}]. People of South Asian origin have a higher percentage of body fat for any given BMI while those of Black Caribbean origin have a lower percentage body fat for any given BMI [^{8}^{}^{11}], (c.f. Higgins,2008) [^{12}]. Higher amounts of body fat and obesity are associated with increased risk of adverse health events and greater mortality [^{13}]. Obesity has been defined by the American College of Sports Medicine [^{2}] as an excessive amount of adipose tissue, which is defined in young adults as body fat > 25percentage in males and >32percentage in females.
Percentage of body fat is usually assessed by using skinfold thickness in clinical & field setting because this method is simple to use and low in cost [^{14}]. Regression equations are used to calculate body composition (body density, percentage body fat) from these skinfold measurements [^{15}]. However, as all these prediction equations are based on mathematical relationships, they predict body composition only if population resembles the reference population that was used in the development of the prediction equation [^{16}]. Most of the existing equations or the estimation of body fat percentage for example Jackson and Pollock [^{6}] and Durnin and Womersley [^{17}] which are widely used in epidemiological studies using skinfolds have been developed and validated in the Caucasian population and tend to under predict body fat percentage in Asian Indians. Considering the ethnic differences in fat percentage in 2010, Sandhu et al. [^{18}] developed a body fat mass prediction equation for young Indian adults using skinfold data and body fat percentage using under water weighing.
Several non exercise prediction equations for the estimation of VO_{2}max use percentage body fat in their formulation. Again these equations were also developed and validated in ethnic populations other than Indians. The ethnic differences in percentage body fat may make them unsuitable for use in Asian Indians. Jackson et al. (1990) [^{6}] & Heil et al.(1995) [^{5}] proposed prediction models which use body fat percentage of an individual in their formulation. These equations have been shown to be fairly reliable and valid. Researchers [^{19}] have checked the crossvalidation of nonexercise models (NEx) [^{6}] and have found it accurate for healthy adults and suggested its use in epidemiological studies.
We believe that these NEx prediction equations may not be very accurate in the Asian Indian population because of the inherent differences in body compositions that exist in different races, specifically the fact that for a given BMI the percentage body fat in Asian Indians is higher [^{20}] and hence a limited sub maximal aerobic capacity and reduced VO_{2}max relative to body weight [^{21}] Jackson [^{6}] equation has been widely used in epidemiological studies. Since it utilizes body fat percentage in its formulation, our study was designed with the objective of trying to examine the correlation between lab measurement of VO_{2}max and the VO_{2}max calculated through [^{6}] NEX prediction equation. As it incorporates an individual’s body fat percentage we decided to use the body fat percentage calculated through 3 methods and analyse which of these predicted VO_{2}max values more closely to the lab measured VO_{2}max. Lastly we wanted to analyze the validity of this nonexercise prediction equation using body fat percentage calculated through the above methods.
One hundred twenty college students (males = 60; females = 60), aged 18 to 27 year, satisfied the requirements of this study. Volunteers, recruited for the study, were primarily the students of Department of Sports Medicine & Physiotherapy, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab India. Criteria for inclusion in the study were, participants who were non athletic, but who occasionally participated in recreational activities, who were able to perform exercise, with no prior history of cardiovascular, peripheral vascular, respiratory diseases, malignancy, orthopaedic or musculoskeletal lesion. Subjects should have been non smokers, non alcoholic, not taking any medications and non diabetics. All participants signed an informed consent document in accordance with University ethical Committee guidelines.
Prior to testing, all subjects completed
*brief Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PARQ) [^{22}] to screen for cardiovascular contraindications.
*Physical Activity Recall (PAR) questionnaire (0–7 scale) [[^{6}].
The participant was asked to give the appropriate PAR score (0–7) based on the following scale:
I. Does not participate regularly in programmed recreation, sport, or physical activity.
0 points: Avoids walking or exercise (for example, always uses elevators, drives whenever possible instead of walking).
1 point: Walks for pleasure, routinely uses stairs, occasionally exercises sufficiently to cause heavy breathing or perspiration.
II. Participates regularly in recreation or work requiring modest physical activity (such as golf, horseback riding, calisthenics, gymnastics, table tennis, bowling, weight lifting, or yard work).
2 points: 10–60 min per week
3 points: Over 1 h per week
III. Participates regularly in heavy physical exercise (such as running or jogging, swimming, cycling, rowing, skipping rope, running in place) or engages in vigorous aerobic type activity (such as tennis, basketball, or handball).
4 points: Runs less than 1 mile per week or spends less than 30 min per week in comparable physical activity.
5 points: Runs 1–5 miles per week or spends 30–60 min per week in comparable physical activity.
6 points: Runs 5–10 miles per week or spends 1–3 h per week in comparable physical activity.
7 points: Runs more than 10 miles per week or spends more than 3 h per week in comparable physical activity.
Foursite skinfold measures were evaluated for females and males (biceps, triceps, subscapularis, and suprailiac) using Harpenden caliper to determine percent body fat (percentage fat).
Participants were instructed to drink plenty of water and abstain from strenuous exercise for 24 h prior to testing, and not to consume food, alcohol, caffeine, or tobacco products three hours before testing [^{2}]. Each participant was fitted with a HR monitor (Polar Inc., NY) to measure exercise HR during the maximal GXT on a calibrated motor driven treadmill (Vacuumed Vista MX, California, USA). Participants’ height and body mass were measured and recorded while wearing lightweight clothing and no shoes, using a stadiometer and calibrated digital weight scale(model:EBEQ90,equinox overseas (P) Ltd., India). Instructions about the maximal GXT (involving the protocol, electronic heart rate monitor, mouth piece, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale [^{23}] were given to all participants prior to testing. Also participants were allowed to practice treadmill walking/jogging as needed to become familiar with the equipment.
Participants performed a maximal GXT using Bruce graded GXT protocol [^{24}] consists of seven stages. Each stage comprised of 3 mins. During the maximal GXT, metabolic gases were collected using the Vacuumed Vista MX metabolic measurement system (California, USA). The VO_{2}max and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were computed, averaged, and printed by an online computer system every 10 seconds. The participants’ exercise heart rate (HR) and RPE score was recorded at the end of each stage. VO_{2}max was considered valid when at least two of the following criteria were met [^{4}]:
1 Maximal heart rate within 15 beats of age predicted maximal heart rate [^{25}].
2 Respiratory exchange ratio equal to or greater than 1.10 [^{26}].
3 RPE equal to or greater than 17.
4 The subject did not show any increase in oxygen consumption even after increasing the intensity of exercise.
5 Participants who failed to meet at least two of these criteria were dropped from the study.
Body fat percentage was then calculated by using three different formulae i.e.
1 Sandhu et al’s fat mass equation [^{18}] (S’s eqn)
2 DurninWomersley’s 4 site percentage body fat [^{17}] (DW ‘s eqn)and
3 Jackson & Pollock’s 4 site percentage body fat [^{27}]. (JPs eqn)
The calculated body fat percentage was utilized in the estimation of VO2max by using Jackson et al’s [^{6}] prediction equation i.e.
(1)
N−ExVO2maxusingpercentageF=50.513+1.589Historyofphysicalfitness0–7–0.289age–0.552percentageF+5.863gender0–1. 
Three different formulae for the calculation of body fat percentage for males and females were applied and thus three different values of the same for both males and females were obtained. ANOVA was applied to test for the statistical significance between these values followed by Scheffe’s post hoc test. Then VO_{2}max was calculated by substituting these body fat percentages in Jackson et al’s (1990) [^{6}] equation. Again ANOVA was applied to the VO_{2}max calculated through different percentage body fat followed by post hoc Scheffe’s test. Inter class correlation matrix was also used on the calculated VO_{2} max (through substituting percentage body fats) to test the correlation between the measured VO_{2}max and the calculated VO_{2}max.
Table 1 shows the mean values and standard deviations of the VO_{2} max obtained by a graded exercise treadmill test in the lab indicated as VO_{2}max (lab); the VO_{2}max obtained by substituting body fat percentage value obtained by Jackson and Pollock’s equation(JP eqn) for estimation of body fat through skinfolds indicated as VO_{2} max(JJP); the Vo_{2} max obtained by substituting body fat percentage value obtained from Durnin and Womerslay’s equation(DWs eqn) [^{17}] for estimation of body fat percentage indicated as VO_{2} max (JDW); and theVO_{2}max obtained by substituting body fat percentage obtained from Sandhu et al’s [^{18}] body fat equation(Ss eqn) for the estimation of fat mass indicated as VO_{2} max (JS). This table indicates that VO_{2} max (JS) gives a mean value (36.05 + _6.04 ml/kg/min) which is closest to the measured VO_{2}max (mean value of 33.41 + _14.39 ml/kg/min) as compared to VO_{2}max (JJP) and Vo_{2}max (JDW) which clearly overestimate the VO_{2} max in our subjects. ANOVA values indicated in Table 2 further highlight the fact that the differences between the values for VO_{2} max obtained from the 3 equations and measured lab value are statistically significant. Post hoc analysis using Scheffe’s test in Table 3 shows that the difference between VO_{2}max (lab) and VO_{2}max (JS) is not statistically significant (p = 0.226) but the differences between VO_{2}max (lab) and VO_{2} max(JJP) and VO_{2}max(JDW) are statistically significant(p < 0.0001). The application of Inter class correlation matrix (Table 4) further indicates that Vo_{2} max (JS) is slightly more correlated to the measured VO_{2} max than the others. Table 2 also indicates the analysis of variance for percentage body fat. The “F” value 191.103 is highly significant. The application of post hoc Scheffe’s test indicates that all 3 body fat percentages were significantly different (p < 0.05).
In this study we measured the VO_{2}max by means of a GXT in college aged participants in India. This study was conducted to check the validity of Jackson et al’s [^{6}] VO_{2}max prediction equation using percentage body fat as a variable. An earlier study [^{21}] has indicated that obese individuals have a reduced (VO_{2}max) relative to body weight thus indicating that percentage body fat has a significant effect on the aerobic capacity (VO_{2}max) of an individual. Secondary to this is the fact that body composition varies with ethnicity [^{7}]. Recent evidence in the field of body composition has indicated that racial differences may exist in body composition. Specifically researchers [^{28}] have indicated that Asians had more subcutaneous fat than whites and had different fat distributions from whites. Asians had more upperbody subcutaneous fat than whites. Researchers [^{28}] have also indicated that BMI for given weight under predicts the percentage body fat in Asian Indians. A study [[^{29}] has indicated that for the same BMI, percentage BF for Pacific Island men was 4percentage points lower and for Asian Indian men was 7–8percentage points higher compared to Europeans. Compared to European men for the same percentage BF, BMI was 2–3 units higher for Pacific Island and 3–6 units lower for Asian Indians. Asian Indians have more abdominal fat deposition than their European and Pacific Island counterparts. Considering this evidence we believed that prediction equations for the estimation of VO_{2}max would be inaccurate and substituting percentage body fat values obtained from formulae developed specifically for Asian Indians would be better correlated to lab measured values of VO_{2}max.
Our results indicated that our Asian Indian subjects indeed did have lower VO_{2}max values as compared to age matched subjects from Caucasian populations indicating a lower level of fitness. Specifically we recorded a mean value of 33.41 ± 14.39 ml/kg/min which is much lower than those recorded by other investigators in age matched subjects (Heil et al [[^{5}]. :45.83 ± 6.57 ml/kg/min and Bradshaw et al.[^{22}] :45.17 + −7.59 ml/kg/min). We believe the lower levels could be because of two reasons. Firstly as reported by previous investigations our subjects did indeed have greater amounts of fat mass for a given weight as compared to other ethnicities which would indeed hamper fitness and not contribute to metabolic activity. Secondly is observation that in general South Asians have lower levels of physical fitness than their European counterparts [^{30},^{31}]. Reasons for this have been suggested to a more restricted range of sporting and leisure activities than Europeans [^{30}].
We also found that Jackson et als’ [^{6}] predictive equation overestimated the VO_{2}max compared to the measured value irrespective of which of the three studied equations was used to estimate the fat percentage of subjects. However of the three studied equations we found that substituting fat percentage values obtained from Sandhu et al’s [^{18}] fat mass equation yielded a VO_{2}max value that was closer to the measured value as compared to the other two equations. This better correlation observed could be due to the fact that the indigenously developed body fat mass equation generated by Sandhu et al., 2010 [[^{18}] used actual values of body fat measured using the “gold standard” under water weighing method in its generation and the fact that it was developed on Asian Indian subjects increased its accuracy in this population.
Earlier researchers have proved that Durnin Womerslay’s [[^{17}] equation, which was derived using underwater weighing method, over estimate body fat and percentage body fat in populations of developing countries [^{32}]yet it is widely used in many epidemiological studies. Similarly Jackson and Pollock’s [^{6}] equation also developed in Caucasian populations is also used worldwide for the estimation of body fat percentage.
Our study has many implications. Despite the fact that we had delimited our study to the investigation of only one predictive equation, our study suggests that prediction equations may not be very accurate when used in populations other than those on whom they were generated. Hence they need to be used with caution in other ethnic populations. Though this study indicates that when fat percentage is determined, Sandhu et al's [^{18}] equation is used, the value for VO_{2} max is slightly more reliable than the other two. However, further study regarding its validity when it is used in prediction equation is warranted. Therefore, validation of Sandhu et al’s [^{18}] equation and cross validation of DurninWomerslay’s [^{17}] body fat equation is warranted.
Our results suggest caution in the use of Jackson et al’s [^{6}] equation in Indian population given the observation that it tends to over predict the VO_{2}max in Asian Indian subjects. Similarly the validity of equations for the measurement of percentage body fat is also questionable when used in this population. Thus our study supports the development and validation of population specific prediction equations for the estimation of both body fat and VO_{2}max.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
SS conceived and designed the study, interpreted the data, drafted and revised the manuscript. BT carried out the data collection, statistical analysis and interpretation and drafted the manuscript. JS participated in its design, coordination and revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
Lars H,Lange A,Aerobic work capacity in young Norwegian men and womenJ. of Applied PhysiologyYear: 1965203425431  
American College of Sports MedicineACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and PrescriptionYear: 20067Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers, Philadelphia, PA  
American College of Sports MedicineACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescriptionYear: 20108Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD  
American College of Sports MedicineACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescriptionYear: 20006Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia  
Heil DP,Freedson PS,Ahlquist LE,Price J,Rippe J,Nonexercise regression models to estimate peak oxygen consumptionMed Sci Sports ExercYear: 1995275996067791593  
Jackson AS,Blair SN,Mahar MT,Wier LT,Ross RM,Stuteville JE,Prediction of functional aerobic capacity exercise testingMed Sci Sports ExercYear: 1990228638702287267  
Harsha DW,Bray GA,Body composition and childhood obesityEndocrinol Metab Clin North AnYear: 19962587187810.1016/S08898529(05)703595  
Snehalatha C,Viswanathan V,Ramachandran A,Cutoff values for normal anthropometric variables in Asian Indian adultsDiabetes CareYear: 2003261380138410.2337/diacare.26.5.138012716792  
McKeigue PM,Shah B,Marmot MG,Relation of central obesity and insulin resistance with high diabetes prevalence and cardiovascular risk in South AsiansLancetYear: 199133738238610.1016/01406736(91)91164P1671422  
Prentice A,Jebb S,Beyond body mass indexObes RevYear: 2001214114710.1046/j.1467789x.2001.00031.x12120099  
Rush EC,Goedecke JH,Jennings C,Miclesfiled L,Dugas L,Lambert EV,Plank LD,BMI, fat and muscle differences in urban women of five ethnicities from two countriesInt J ObesityYear: 2007311232123910.1038/sj.ijo.0803576  
Higgins V,Ethnic Differences in Obesity, Diet and Physical Activity – A Literature reviewCCSR Working PaperYear: 200817120  
Deurenberg P,Deurenberg YM,Wang J,Lin FP,Schmidt G,The impact of body build on the relationship between body mass index and percent body fatInt J ObesityYear: 19992353754210.1038/sj.ijo.0800868  
Heymsfield S,Smith R,Aulet M,Benson B,Litchman S,Wang J,Pierson RN Jr,Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: measurement by dualphoton absorptiometryAm J Clin NutrYear: 1990522142182375286  
Jackson AS,Pollock ML,Generalized equations for predicting body density for menBr J NutrYear: 19784049750410.1079/BJN19780152718832  
Wickramasinghi VP,Laabadusuriya SP,Cleghorn GJ,Davis PS,Development of height weight based equation for assessment of body composition in Sri Lankan ChildrenIndian J. of PaediatricsYear: 20107715516010.1007/s1209800903335  
Durnin JV,Womerslay GA,Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 yearsBrit J of NutrYear: 197432779710.1079/BJN197400604843734  
Sandhu JS,Gupta G,Shenoy S,Prediction equation for calculating fat mass in young Indian adultsAsian J of Sports MedYear: 20101210110722375197  
Williford HN,ScharffOlson M,Wang N,Blessing DL,Smith FH,Duey WJ,Crossvalidation of nonexercise predictions of VO2peak in womenMed Sci Sports ExercYear: 19962892693010.1097/00005768199607000000228832549  
Liew CF,Seah ES,Yeo KP L,Nondiabetic asian Indians have decreased insulin sensitivity and insulin clearance, and raised leptin compared to Caucasians and Chinese subjectsInt J ObesYear: 20032778478910.1038/sj.ijo.0802307  
Goran M,Fields DA,Hunter GR,Herd SL,Weinsier RL,Total body gat does not influence maximal aerobic capacityInt J ObesYear: 20002484184810.1038/sj.ijo.0801241  
Bradshaw DI,George JD,Hyde A,LaMonte MJ,Vehrs PR,Hager RL,Yanowitz FG,An accurate VO2max nonexercise regression model for 18–65yearold adultsRes Q Exerc SportYear: 200576442643210.5641/027013605X1308071984135616739680  
Borg GAV,Psychophysical Bases of Perceived ExertionMed Sci Sports ExercYear: 1982143773817154893  
Bruce RA,Kusumi F,Hosmer D,Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular diseaseAm Heart JYear: 19738554656210.1016/00028703(73)9050244632004  
Howley ET,Bassett DR Jr,Welch HG,Criteria for maximal oxygen uptake: a review and commentaryMed Sci Sports ExercYear: 19959129213018531628  
Issekutz B,Birkhead NC,Rodahl K,The use of respiratory quotients in assessment of aerobic power and capacityJ of App PhysiolYear: 196214750  
Body fat calculator 6 formula to calculate body fat percentage Database http://www.linearsoftware.com/online.html.  
Wang J,Thornton JC,Russell M,Burastero S,Heymsfield S,Pierson NR Jr,Asians have lower body mass index (BMI) but higher percent body fat than do whites:comparisons of anthropometric measurementsAm J Clin NutrYear: 19946023288017333  
Elaine R,Lindsay P,Vishnu C,Manaia L,David S,Boyd S,Chittaranjan Y,Body size, body composition, and fat distribution: a comparison of young New Zealand men of European, Pacific Island, and Asian Indian ethnicitiesNZMJYear: 20041171207  
Hayes L,White M,Unwin N,Bhopal R,Fichsbacher C,Harland J,Alberti KGM,Patterns of Physical activity and relationship with risk markers for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Indian, Pakistani Bangladeshi and European adults in a UK populationJournal of Public Health MedicineYear: 200224317017810.1093/pubmed/24.3.17012831085  
Erens B,Primatesta P,Prior G,Health Survey for England 1999The Health of Minority Ethnic GroupsYear: 2001TSO, London  
Immik MD,Flores R,Diaz EO,Body mass index, body composition and chronic energy deficiency classification of rural adult population in GuatemelaEur J Clin NutriYear: 2003777175 
Tables
VO_{2 }max values obtained by the substitution of body fat values obtained by different formulae
Mean ± SD ml/kg/min  

VO_{2 }max (Lab)

33.41 ± 14.39

1. VO_{2 }max (JJP)

43.25 ± 7.81

2. VO_{2 }max (JDW)

40.47 ± 8.79

3. VO_{2 }max (JS)  36.05 ± 6.04 
Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) for VO_{2}max and percentage Body fat from Jackson Pollock, Durnin Womersley and Sandhu
1. VO_{2 }Max  Sum of squares  df  Mean square  F  Sig. 

Between Groups

6977.761

3

2325.920

24.343

.000*

Within Groups

45480.583

476

95.547



Total

52458.345

479




2. percentage Body Fat

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Between Groups

8237.445

2

4118.722

191.103

.000*

Within Groups

3814.765

177

21.552



Total  12052.210  179 
*The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Post Hoc Test Scheffe’s for VO2max(lab),VO2max (JJP),VO2max (JDW) and VO2max (JS)

Variables

Sig.

95percentage confidence interval



Lower Bound  Upper Bound  
VO_{2}max (lab)

VO_{2}max (JJP)

.000*

−13.3742

−6.2935


VO_{2}max (JDW)

.000*

−10.6037

−3.5230


VO_{2 }max (JS)

.226

−6.1785

.9022

VO_{2}max (JJP)






VO_{2}max (JDW)

.187

.7698

6.3109


VO_{2 }max (JS)

.000*.

3.6554

10.7361

VO_{2}max (JDW)





VO_{2 }max (JS)  .007*  .8849  7.9656 
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Inter class correlation between VO2max(lab),VO2max (JJP),VO2max (JDW) and VO2max (JS)
Vo2max (lab)  VO2(JJP)  VO2(JDW)  VO2(JS)  

Vo2max  1.000  .807  .814  .817 
Article Categories:

Previous Document: Screening for small molecule inhibitors of Toxoplasma gondii.
Next Document: Epilepsy in Rett syndrome, and CDKL5 and FOXG1generelated encephalopathies.