Document Detail


Concordance of physician ratings with the appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21453833     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the consistency in appropriate use criteria (AUC) ratings among a broad range of practicing cardiologists and the AUC Technical Panel.
BACKGROUND: AUC for coronary revascularization have been developed by selected experts.
METHODS: Before AUC publication, 85 cardiologists from 10 U.S. institutions assessed the appropriateness of coronary revascularization for 68 indications that had been evaluated by the AUC Technical Panel. Each indication was classified as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate, based on the physician group's median rating. Rates of concordance between the physician group and the AUC Technical Panel (i.e., same appropriateness category assignment) and rates of nonagreement within the physician group (≥ 25% of panelists' ratings outside the group's appropriateness category assessment) were determined.
RESULTS: Overall concordance between the 2 groups was 84%. Among indications classified as appropriate by the AUC Technical Panel, concordance between the 2 groups was excellent (94% [34 of 36]); however, nonagreement within the physician group was 44% (16 of 36). Among indications classified as uncertain, there was 73% (16 of 22) concordance between the 2 groups. Among inappropriate indications, concordance was moderate (70% [7 of 10]), but nonagreement occurred frequently (70% [7 of 10]). Moreover, there was substantial variation in appropriateness ratings between individual physicians and the AUC Technical Panel (weighted kappa range: 0.05 to 0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Although there was good concordance in assessments of appropriateness for coronary revascularization between physicians and the AUC Technical Panel, nonagreement within the physician group was common and there was marked variation in ratings between individual physicians and the AUC Technical Panel.
Authors:
Paul S Chan; Ralph G Brindis; David J Cohen; Philip G Jones; Elizabeth Gialde; Richard G Bach; Jeptha Curtis; Charles F Bethea; Marc E Shelton; John A Spertus
Related Documents :
15002843 - Focal colors and unique hues.
16294003 - A case of oculocutaneous albinism in a maltese.
111593 - Safety of changing intravenous delivery systems at longer than 24-hour intervals.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American College of Cardiology     Volume:  57     ISSN:  1558-3597     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.     Publication Date:  2011 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-04-01     Completed Date:  2011-06-14     Revised Date:  2014-01-07    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8301365     Medline TA:  J Am Coll Cardiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1546-53     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Female
Humans
Male
Myocardial Revascularization*
Patient Selection*
Physician's Practice Patterns*
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
K23 HL102224/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS; K23 HL102224-01/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS; K23HL102224/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Apr 5;57(14):1554-6   [PMID:  21453834 ]
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Apr 5;57(14):1557-9   [PMID:  21453835 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Predictors of new-onset diabetes in patients treated with atorvastatin results from 3 large randomiz...
Next Document:  A short history of bladder exstrophy.