Document Detail


Computer input devices: neutral party or source of significant error in manual lesion segmentation?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20049624     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Lesion segmentation involves outlining the contour of an abnormality on an image to distinguish boundaries between normal and abnormal tissue and is essential to track malignant and benign disease in medical imaging for clinical, research, and treatment purposes. A laser optical mouse and a graphics tablet were used by radiologists to segment 12 simulated reference lesions per subject in two groups (one group comprised three lesion morphologies in two sizes, one for each input device for each device two sets of six, composed of three morphologies in two sizes each). Time for segmentation was recorded. Subjects completed an opinion survey following segmentation. Error in contour segmentation was calculated using root mean square error. Error in area of segmentation was calculated compared to the reference lesion. 11 radiologists segmented a total of 132 simulated lesions. Overall error in contour segmentation was less with the graphics tablet than with the mouse (P < 0.0001). Error in area of segmentation was not significantly different between the tablet and the mouse (P = 0.62). Time for segmentation was less with the tablet than the mouse (P = 0.011). All subjects preferred the graphics tablet for future segmentation (P = 0.011) and felt subjectively that the tablet was faster, easier, and more accurate (P = 0.0005). For purposes in which accuracy in contour of lesion segmentation is of the greater importance, the graphics tablet is superior to the mouse in accuracy with a small speed benefit. For purposes in which accuracy of area of lesion segmentation is of greater importance, the graphics tablet and mouse are equally accurate.
Authors:
James Y Chen; F Jacob Seagull; Paul Nagy; Paras Lakhani; Elias R Melhem; Eliot L Siegel; Nabile M Safdar
Related Documents :
8310554 - Preoperative diagnosis of primary fallopian tube carcinoma by transvaginal ultrasound, ...
21909474 - Early surgical repair of acute complete rupture of the proximal hamstring tendons.
9485124 - Interrelation of coronary angiographic reference lumen size and intravascular ultrasoun...
17271574 - Intra-operative rf ablation in the atria.
17550514 - A technique for the orientation of endoscopically resected laryngeal lesions.
8294324 - Ascitic fluid cholesterol in differential diagnosis of ascites.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of digital imaging     Volume:  24     ISSN:  1618-727X     ISO Abbreviation:  J Digit Imaging     Publication Date:  2011 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-01-24     Completed Date:  2011-05-02     Revised Date:  2013-05-31    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9100529     Medline TA:  J Digit Imaging     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  135-41     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. James_Chen@alumni.brown.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Data Collection
Diagnostic Errors*
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted* / instrumentation
Lasers*
Male
Observer Variation
Phantoms, Imaging
Physicians*
Radiology*
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Anatomically anchored template-based level set segmentation: application to quadriceps muscles in MR...
Next Document:  Applications of membrane techniques for purification of natural products.