Document Detail


Computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of blunt carotid/vertebral artery injury: a note of caution.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17893500     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) by 16-channel multidetector scanner is increasingly replacing conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for diagnosing or excluding blunt carotid/vertebral injuries (BCVI). To date there has been only 1 study in which all patients received both examinations. That study reported a high accuracy for 16-detector CTA. The current prospective parallel comparative study aims at validating this high accuracy and examining the rates of evaluability of CTA performed with a 16-detector scanner with image reconstruction by modern imaging software. METHODS: Patients at risk for BCVI (facial/cervical-spinal fractures; unexplained neurologic deficit; anisocoria; lateral neck soft tissue injury; clinical suspicion) underwent both CTA (16-channel multidetector scanner) and DSA. Results of the 2 studies and the clinical course were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: During the 40-month study period ending March 2007, approximately 7000 blunt trauma patients were evaluated and of these 119 (1.7%) consecutive patients meeting inclusion criteria were screened by CTA. Ninety-two patients underwent confirmatory DSA. Twenty-three (22%) DSA identified 26 BCVI (vertebral, 13; carotid, 13). Among these 23 CTAs, 17 identified 19 BCVIs (vertebral, 10; carotid, 9) (true positives), and 6 failed to identify 7 BCVIs (vertebral, 3; carotid, 4) (false negatives). Sixty-nine of the 92 DSA were normal. Of these 69 CTAs, 10 were falsely suspicious for 11 BCVIs (vertebral, 7; carotid, 4) (false positives), and 56 were normal (true negatives). The remaining 3 CTAs were nonevaluable (mistimed contrast, 1; streak artifact, 2). Sixteen of 89 (18%) evaluable CTAs, were suboptimal (mistimed contrast, 9; streak artifacts, 4; motion artifact, 2; body habitus, 1). Excluding the 3 nonevaluable CTAs, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CTA for diagnosing or excluding BCVI were 74%, 86%, 65%, and 90% respectively. One patient with grade II carotid artery injuries (by CTA and DSA) on antiplatelet agent developed stroke related to carotid artery injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Current CTA technology cannot reliably diagnose or exclude BCVI. Twenty percent of CTAs are either nonevaluable or suboptimal. Until more data are available and the technique is standardized, the current trend towards using CTA to screen for and/or diagnose these rare but potentially devastating injuries is dangerous.
Authors:
Ajai K Malhotra; Marc Camacho; Rao R Ivatury; Ivan C Davis; Daniel J Komorowski; Daniel A Leung; John D Grizzard; Michel B Aboutanos; Therese M Duane; Charlotte Cockrell; Luke G Wolfe; C Todd Borchers; Nancy R Martin
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Annals of surgery     Volume:  246     ISSN:  0003-4932     ISO Abbreviation:  Ann. Surg.     Publication Date:  2007 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-09-25     Completed Date:  2007-11-08     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372354     Medline TA:  Ann Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  632-42; discussion 642-3     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Emergency General Surgery, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA. akmalhot@vcu.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiography / methods*
Angiography, Digital Subtraction / methods
Anisocoria / radiography
Carotid Artery Injuries / radiography*
Cervical Vertebrae / injuries,  radiography
Facial Injuries / radiography
False Negative Reactions
False Positive Reactions
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods
Male
Middle Aged
Neck Injuries / radiography
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Soft Tissue Injuries / radiography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
Vertebral Artery / injuries*,  radiography
Wounds, Nonpenetrating / radiography*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Induction chemotherapy in Barrett cancer: influence on surgical risk and outcome.
Next Document:  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: predictors of malignant and invasive pathology.