Document Detail


Comparison of two frequency questionnaires for quantifying fruit and vegetable intake.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11299096     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: The effect on individual rankings and total intakes of nutrients of correcting total fruit and vegetable frequencies from a long food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) using the responses to two summary questions was examined in a group of women. METHODS: The performance of a self-administered FFQ in ranking individual levels of intake and estimating absolute levels of nutrient and energy intake was compared with the performance of the questionnaire when it was corrected for fruit and vegetable intake reported using the Block summary questions. SUBJECTS: The study population included 123 women, aged between 18 and 54 years, who were recruited from the Family Planning Association Colposcopy Clinic in Sydney. RESULTS: Substantial and significant differences (P < 0.001) were found in fruit and vegetable intakes between the FFQ and the summary questions. Intake frequency by the FFQ was more than double that by the summary questions. When the FFQ was corrected for fruit and vegetable intakes using the summary questions, the intakes of beta-carotene, vitamins A and C, and dietary fibre were more than 20% lower (p < 0.001) than the uncorrected results. However, this had little effect on ranking individuals. This study also examined seasonal differences in vegetable intakes and differences in nutrient intakes when either summer or winter vegetable consumption was substituted for seasonal vegetable intake in the FFQ. Although there were seasonal differences for some foods, the substitution had little effect on intake of nutrients. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that important differences in intakes are observed when two methods, which appear to yield the same results, are used. Further work is needed to determine which, if either, of the two methods yields intakes that can be compared quantitatively with national references for assessing the adequacy of population intakes.
Authors:
S Amanatidis; D Mackerras; J M Simpson
Related Documents :
8320406 - Reproducibility and validity of food intake measurements from a semiquantitative food f...
2345706 - Reproducibility and comparability of a computerized, self-administered food frequency q...
18165856 - Development and validation of a brief food frequency questionnaire for dietary lutein a...
8694736 - Association of zinc and antioxidant nutrients with age-related maculopathy.
11694006 - Report on the levels of cadmium, lead, and mercury in imported rice grain samples.
1141616 - Nutritional knowledge of health food users in oahu, hawaii.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Public health nutrition     Volume:  4     ISSN:  1368-9800     ISO Abbreviation:  Public Health Nutr     Publication Date:  2001 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2001-04-12     Completed Date:  2001-08-02     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9808463     Medline TA:  Public Health Nutr     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  233-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Central Sydney Area Health Service, Division of Population Health, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Diet / statistics & numerical data*
Female
Fruit*
Humans
Mental Recall
Middle Aged
Nutrition Assessment
Questionnaires*
Reproducibility of Results
Seasons
Vegetables*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  What do users of reduced-fat dairy products know about the fat in their diets?
Next Document:  A household food inventory for North American Chinese.