Document Detail

Comparison of three psychological defense mechanism questionnaires.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16370659     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
The Defense Mechanisms Inventory (DMI), the Coping Operations Preference Enquiry (COPE), and the scales developed by Joffe and Naditch (J&N) were compared using multitrait-multimethod logic. Convergent validity was tow as measures of the same defense were not highly correlated across instruments. Similar patterns of correlations occurred within instruments but the J&N scales, and particularly the DMI scales, had high interscale correlations so overall discriminant validity was limited. These results suggest that either the defense constructs or at least some of the defense scales studied lack validity. Another possibility is that the scales are valid, but assess different parameters of defensiveness (e.g., intensity versus breadth of use of mechanisms). Comparisons of the scales' predictive validity should help resolve these points.
R R Vickers; L K Hervig
Related Documents :
15141939 - Validity and reliability of a cantonese-translated rating of perceived exertion scale a...
18404769 - Quantification of power consumption and oxygen transfer characteristics of a stirred mi...
23569199 - Role of exercise in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: results, mechanisms, and ...
16370659 - Comparison of three psychological defense mechanism questionnaires.
11220369 - Quantitative and qualitative outcome measures after thalamic deep brain stimulation to ...
8338189 - Effect of overlearning on the feeling of knowing is more detectable in within-subject t...
17383939 - Performance and practice in uk hospital transfusion laboratories.
15475599 - Attenuation of induced bronchoconstriction in healthy subjects: effects of breathing de...
16243909 - Exercise training increases basal tone in arterioles distal to chronic coronary occlusion.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of personality assessment     Volume:  45     ISSN:  0022-3891     ISO Abbreviation:  J Pers Assess     Publication Date:  1981 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-12-22     Completed Date:  2006-01-30     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  1260201     Medline TA:  J Pers Assess     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  630-8     Citation Subset:  -    
Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA 92138, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  The Barnum effect in a group setting.
Next Document:  Measurement of creativity: review and critique.