Document Detail

Comparison of open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy outcomes from a surgeon's early experience.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17991534     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVES: The comparative safety and efficacy of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) performed by a newly trained surgeon have not been well documented. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from the first 75 cases each of RRP and LRP performed contemporaneously after urologic training. Urologic complications, pathologic outcomes, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes were assessed, the latter by validated questionnaire at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: A selection bias was evident, because the RRP patients had a greater prostate-specific antigen level, body mass index, and pathologic stage than did the LRP patients. Nevertheless, the positive margin rates were low overall (19% RRP and 9% LRP, P = 0.18) and for those with pT2 disease (4% RRP and 6% LRP). With a mean follow-up of just longer than 2 years, 19 (25%) of 75 RRP patients required 32 subsequent procedures and 8 (11%) of 75 LRP patients required 10 procedures (P = 0.02). The bladder neck contracture rate was 16% for RRP and 3% for LRP (P = 0.02), and artificial urinary sphincters were placed in 7 RRP and 0 LRP patients. At 12 months, 47% and 64% of the RRP and LRP patients were fully continent, respectively (P = 0.046), and the LRP cohort used fewer pads (P = 0.022). Of the preoperatively potent patients who underwent a nerve-sparing procedure, 44% of the RRP and 41% of the LRP group were potent at 12 months (P = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: In one surgeon's initial experience, LRP resulted in fewer urologic complications and more reliable continence outcomes than did RRP without compromising potency or cancer control. Both procedures require experience to achieve acceptable health-related quality-of-life outcomes.
Andrew A Wagner; Richard E Link; Bruce J Trock; Wendy Sullivan; Christian P Pavlovich
Related Documents :
8256394 - Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. the...
10837944 - Predicting long-term survival, and the need for hormonal therapy: a meta-analysis of rt...
20156044 - Penile rehabilitation therapy following radical prostatectomy.
20879054 - Impact of prostate volume on the efficacy of high-power potassium-titanyl-phosphate pho...
23011584 - What is the effect of the early weight-bearing mobilisation without using any support a...
16854754 - The efficacy of combined puva and low-dose azathioprine for early and enhanced repigmen...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Urology     Volume:  70     ISSN:  1527-9995     ISO Abbreviation:  Urology     Publication Date:  2007 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-11-09     Completed Date:  2007-12-14     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0366151     Medline TA:  Urology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  667-71     Citation Subset:  IM    
Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Erectile Dysfunction / etiology
Middle Aged
Prostatectomy* / adverse effects,  methods
Quality of Life

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Grade of hydronephrosis and tumor diameter as preoperative prognostic factors in ureteral transition...
Next Document:  Onion and garlic intake and the odds of benign prostatic hyperplasia.