Document Detail


Comparison of modified preadmission glucose-lowering regimen with basal/bolus regimen for glucose control on outcome in general medicine wards.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21070530     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: It is undecided whether glucose control as advocated by the professional organisations and the glucose-lowering method by itself affects clinical outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus hospitalised in general medical wards. Our aim was to investigate whether a basal/bolus regimen and a modified prehospitalisation regimen have a different impact on the clinical diabetic patients in general medicine wards.
METHODS: Glucose control of patients with diabetes hospitalised in two different wards of internal medicine was achieved according to their wards' policy: a modified preadmission regimen (conventional regime) or a basal/bolus regimen (intensive regime). Death and any adverse event were determined during hospitalisation and within 6 months after discharge to assess clinical outcome.
RESULTS: Median fasting and daily glucose levels were similar in the conventional (n = 116) and intensive regime (n = 129) groups: 161 mg/dl (inter-quartile range: 138-201) and 176 mg/dl (152-215) vs. 155 mg/dl (133-208) and 173 mg/dl (146-208) respectively. Clinical outcome was not affected by the treatment modality. In the subgroup of patients hospitalised with infection, the median fasting glucose was significantly lower in the interventional compared with the conventional regime: 141 and 172 mg/dl respectively (p = 0.041). However, tighter control was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse events within 6 months after discharge: 48.9% and 21.4% respectively (p = 0.047).
CONCLUSION: In general medicine wards, modified prehospital hypoglycaemic regimens and a basal/bolus insulin regimen achieve similar glucose control. The clinical outcome was not affected by the modality of glucose control.
Authors:
A E Buchs; O Kalter-Leibovici; O Gorelik; N Cohen; O Golan; M J Rapoport
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of clinical practice     Volume:  64     ISSN:  1742-1241     ISO Abbreviation:  Int. J. Clin. Pract.     Publication Date:  2010 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-11-12     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9712381     Medline TA:  Int J Clin Pract     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1802-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine C, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Zerifin, Israel. andreasbuchs@gmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  How does late nephrological co-management impact chronic kidney disease? - an observational study.
Next Document:  The procognitive effects of leptin in the brain and their clinical implications.